and it arrived 2 days early, woot!B wrote:Yay! I have an estimated date of delivery!
Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Got mine too. The packaging is bigger than I expected.
I like the booklet, it's not CD-sized so it's easier to read in my old age.
Why do I need a lenticular version of the cover? I mean...is that where the extra $ went? That and the packaging, that is. And speaking of, this is a really cool package.
The back of it's a mess though. Disc 3 info on the left, disc 1 and 2 in the middle, and disc 4 on the right.
I'll be ripping the BRD and putting it on my hi-res player for my weekend trip. Still don't know the reason for the 192/24 master used for the CD but the hi-res is 96/24. I know there's not much difference for most people's ears, but it's a matter of you used it here, why not there?
edit: the "exclusive 12" x 12" litho with each Super Deluxe order" is interesting, I guess.
I like the booklet, it's not CD-sized so it's easier to read in my old age.
Why do I need a lenticular version of the cover? I mean...is that where the extra $ went? That and the packaging, that is. And speaking of, this is a really cool package.
The back of it's a mess though. Disc 3 info on the left, disc 1 and 2 in the middle, and disc 4 on the right.
I'll be ripping the BRD and putting it on my hi-res player for my weekend trip. Still don't know the reason for the 192/24 master used for the CD but the hi-res is 96/24. I know there's not much difference for most people's ears, but it's a matter of you used it here, why not there?
edit: the "exclusive 12" x 12" litho with each Super Deluxe order" is interesting, I guess.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I only went with the 2 disc option. I couldn't spend the extra cash on a bluray I wouldn't listen to and a dvd I wouldn't watch.
Maybe if it had been Pearl Jam.
It's packaged very similar to the solo albums. New artwork pulled mostly from the Hunger Strike video. Looks good. Sounds pretty good.
B+
Maybe if it had been Pearl Jam.
It's packaged very similar to the solo albums. New artwork pulled mostly from the Hunger Strike video. Looks good. Sounds pretty good.
B+
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Damn it. I already tore the package.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I've only taken the CD's out twice - once in the car and once to rip it - and the packaging scratched them.
-
twoheadedboy
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 9:06 pm
- Location: Kenosha, WI
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Got this yesterday. I'm really bothered by the Hunger Strike mix. Eddie not only sounds way louder in the mix, but it sounds like they goosed the EQ right right on that "hungryyyyyyyyy" note frequency. Chris sounds the same volume as before relative to the music but it's like Eddie was 15 feet away originally and now he's singing right in my face, should not be LOUDER than Chris. I also feel like there's unnecessary midrange enhancement throughout, making the guitars and snares sound boxy as shit...same problem I have with the Ten remix and Nevermind remaster, though this one seems to have a bit less clipping as compared to those two at least (Nevermind especially being awful). For an example of albums that don't sound that way, check out Vitalogy and Superunknown, pretty much my references for the pinnacle of rock album production (Presidents of the United States of America and Incubus "Make Yourself" are also fantastic in the production department). In Utero, Pinkerton, and No Code are albums and productions I love but are very "colored" and the production is as much an instrument of the album as the other instruments are, whereas the others mentioned are just in-your-face kick ass dynamic and clear studio efforts.
I feel like I could achieve a better sound overall on TOTD just by enhancing the bass (harmonics plugin, not graphical or parametric EQ) on the original CD and applying some multiband compression to limit it a bit to make it closer to modern standards. I did that with the unreleased "Brother" track (also a little more stereo separation there) and it turned out really nice.
I feel like I could achieve a better sound overall on TOTD just by enhancing the bass (harmonics plugin, not graphical or parametric EQ) on the original CD and applying some multiband compression to limit it a bit to make it closer to modern standards. I did that with the unreleased "Brother" track (also a little more stereo separation there) and it turned out really nice.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Tue January 06, 2026 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
For what it's worth it's worthtragabigzanda wrote: FWIW it's worth
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Tue January 06, 2026 9:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- CopperTom
- Champion of RM
- Posts: 10760
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
- Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Really cool interview with the director of Hunger Strike. Its really nice to hear about the two band´s friendship and to see that after so long their relationship is maybe better.
Man, these shows will be special.
http://www.stereogum.com/1902156/qa-hun ... interview/
Man, these shows will be special.
http://www.stereogum.com/1902156/qa-hun ... interview/
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
-
Revelator
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1931
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I was miffed by the Hunger Strike mix as well, it really kind of cut the balls off of one of the most recognized choruses of the 90s. For the most part I was okay with the rest of the mixes though. I say this as someone with absolutely no experience in the production/audio engineering world.
On the plus side, I really have enjoyed the alternate mixes of Say Hello 2 Heaven, Wooden Jesus, and All Night Thing. Haven't jumped into the other demos and outtakes yet....
On the plus side, I really have enjoyed the alternate mixes of Say Hello 2 Heaven, Wooden Jesus, and All Night Thing. Haven't jumped into the other demos and outtakes yet....
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29574
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
nice interviewVinylGuy wrote:Really cool interview with the director of Hunger Strike. Its really nice to hear about the two band´s friendship and to see that after so long their relationship is maybe better.
Man, these shows will be special.
http://www.stereogum.com/1902156/qa-hun ... interview/
interesting description of the eveolution of the gloryhole scene - i had heard about that, but now it makes a lot more sense
maybe the stage setup for the tour will have a tall weeds, woods, and bonfire theme
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
For folks who buy these deluxe reissue things: How many have been done right? Like, how many times have you said, "Wow, that was perfectly done. I know I got the original album -- which is still far and away the most important part of the release -- for $10 back in 1995, but man, I really am glad I paid an extra $50 for a CD full of demos and alternate mixes of these songs that I've been content to listen to as is for years."twoheadedboy wrote:Got this yesterday. I'm really bothered by the Hunger Strike mix. Eddie not only sounds way louder in the mix, but it sounds like they goosed the EQ right right on that "hungryyyyyyyyy" note frequency. Chris sounds the same volume as before relative to the music but it's like Eddie was 15 feet away originally and now he's singing right in my face, should not be LOUDER than Chris. I also feel like there's unnecessary midrange enhancement throughout, making the guitars and snares sound boxy as shit...same problem I have with the Ten remix and Nevermind remaster, though this one seems to have a bit less clipping as compared to those two at least (Nevermind especially being awful). For an example of albums that don't sound that way, check out Vitalogy and Superunknown, pretty much my references for the pinnacle of rock album production (Presidents of the United States of America and Incubus "Make Yourself" are also fantastic in the production department). In Utero, Pinkerton, and No Code are albums and productions I love but are very "colored" and the production is as much an instrument of the album as the other instruments are, whereas the others mentioned are just in-your-face kick ass dynamic and clear studio efforts.
I feel like I could achieve a better sound overall on TOTD just by enhancing the bass (harmonics plugin, not graphical or parametric EQ) on the original CD and applying some multiband compression to limit it a bit to make it closer to modern standards. I did that with the unreleased "Brother" track (also a little more stereo separation there) and it turned out really nice.
Every year my hatred of these products runs deeper. I am consistently stunned that people continue to spend money on them.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I'm holding out for a Wellwater box set
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I got all the demos and alternative mixes for only 20 bucks.Kevin Davis wrote:For folks who buy these deluxe reissue things: How many have been done right? Like, how many times have you said, "Wow, that was perfectly done. I know I got the original album -- which is still far and away the most important part of the release -- for $10 back in 1995, but man, I really am glad I paid an extra $50 for a CD full of demos and alternate mixes of these songs that I've been content to listen to as is for years."
Every year my hatred of these products runs deeper. I am consistently stunned that people continue to spend money on them.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
Worth it?
- joostone
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1779
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
I mostly agree. These things are label cashcows. Ive read somewhere that about 40-50% of the sales nowadays comes from these deluxe anniversary remixed remastered collector editions. If you're a fan it can be fun though, but most of the times its not. I'm a huge Zeppelin fan but these 2014/15 deluxe remasters were utterly disappointing.Kevin Davis wrote:For folks who buy these deluxe reissue things: How many have been done right? Like, how many times have you said, "Wow, that was perfectly done. I know I got the original album -- which is still far and away the most important part of the release -- for $10 back in 1995, but man, I really am glad I paid an extra $50 for a CD full of demos and alternate mixes of these songs that I've been content to listen to as is for years."
Every year my hatred of these products runs deeper. I am consistently stunned that people continue to spend money on them.
This 2CD TOTD set is just ok, the 100$ superdeluxe set is just stupid. Can someone rip the DVD for me ?
For the analogue age? Stick with your 60s/70s masters. Digital age? Stick with your 90s masters. Remasters are almost never better than the original ones.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Temple of the Dog - 25 Years
That cartoon sucks.
