Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

This is a dumb album. PRAMG all the way.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by stip »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:this suffers from the feeling of redundancy more than anything
Redundancy, yes, but also randomness -- and worse, randomness that the album's programming asks us to accept as uniformity. Unlike "PJ20," which is elevated by its sort of iPod-shuffle, storytelling-via-scrapbooking aesthetic, this album asks that we suspend our disbelief enough to accept that sixteen performances of wildly variable sonic and performance quality across a six-year timeframe comprise a single concert experience which only vaguely resembles the actual flow of one of their shows. With as much live music as is available from PJ, it's probably impossible for any collection of this nature not to feel a bit random, but it should not be difficult to (1) find 16 excellent performances and (2) sequence them sensibly. RM's amateur archivists have proven time and again that these are completely achievable, if not easy, tasks. This album fails on both counts.

fair points all around.
User avatar
ridleybradout
Future Drummer
Posts: 2551
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Rand McNally

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by ridleybradout »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:this suffers from the feeling of redundancy more than anything
Redundancy, yes, but also randomness -- and worse, randomness that the album's programming asks us to accept as uniformity. Unlike "PJ20," which is elevated by its sort of iPod-shuffle, storytelling-via-scrapbooking aesthetic, this album asks that we suspend our disbelief enough to accept that sixteen performances of wildly variable sonic and performance quality across a six-year timeframe comprise a single concert experience which only vaguely resembles the actual flow of one of their shows. With as much live music as is available from PJ, it's probably impossible for any collection of this nature not to feel a bit random, but it should not be difficult to (1) find 16 excellent performances and (2) sequence them sensibly. RM's amateur archivists have proven time and again that these are completely achievable, if not easy, tasks. This album fails on both counts.
This :thumbsup:

It's always really bothered me that Ed asks if the crowd has "still got some?" after the fourth song, yet says "hello, hello, hello" to the crowd after the tenth song. Compilation Making 101 people!

Also, No No Code! Present Tense should have taken the place of Public Image.

The best thing about this release is that Brett Eliason had a chance to fix the shitty mixing of some decent 2008-2010 performances and update a few of his own 2005-06 mixes. The 2005 snare still sounds like shit though.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

Arms Aloft is a terrible song.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40174
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by wease »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:Arms Aloft is a terrible song.
Has any truer thing ever been spoken?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

wease wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:Arms Aloft is a terrible song.
Has any truer thing ever been spoken?
Odd.

I really like it.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

stip wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:this suffers from the feeling of redundancy more than anything
Redundancy, yes, but also randomness -- and worse, randomness that the album's programming asks us to accept as uniformity. Unlike "PJ20," which is elevated by its sort of iPod-shuffle, storytelling-via-scrapbooking aesthetic, this album asks that we suspend our disbelief enough to accept that sixteen performances of wildly variable sonic and performance quality across a six-year timeframe comprise a single concert experience which only vaguely resembles the actual flow of one of their shows. With as much live music as is available from PJ, it's probably impossible for any collection of this nature not to feel a bit random, but it should not be difficult to (1) find 16 excellent performances and (2) sequence them sensibly. RM's amateur archivists have proven time and again that these are completely achievable, if not easy, tasks. This album fails on both counts.

fair points all around.
Interesting points, KD. But I have to wonder if what you're describing is actually what they were intending. I'm not sure that was the thought process behind the album.
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by Kevin Davis »

It may not have been the band's deliberate intention, in fact I'd be surprised if anyone in the band had anything more than a vague awareness of this release to begin with. I just meant that the album aims for a fluidity that it has no hope of achieving, not specifically that the band was trying to fool people into thinking it was one continuous performance.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by Jorge »

I love "Arms Aloft". Not crazy about Pearl Jam's cover of it.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by digster »

Agreed. PJ's cover aside, I like the song quite a bit.
User avatar
joostone
AnalLog
Posts: 1777
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by joostone »

User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by LetMeSleep »

The version of NAIS is too fast.

Screw this album.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

Kevin Davis wrote:It may not have been the band's deliberate intention, in fact I'd be surprised if anyone in the band had anything more than a vague awareness of this release to begin with. I just meant that the album aims for a fluidity that it has no hope of achieving, not specifically that the band was trying to fool people into thinking it was one continuous performance.
Oh, I know. I understood what you meant. And what you meant is what I'm saying I'm not so sure about. Meaning, I don't know that the album is aiming for fluidity.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by McParadigm »

A weakness is still a weakness if it was intentionally created, durd. It's just the difference between an error in judgment and plain stupidity.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:A weakness is still a weakness if it was intentionally created, durd. It's just the difference between an error in judgment and plain stupidity.
Sure.
User avatar
Fuzzcharger
Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
Posts: 1919
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
Location: Australia

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by Fuzzcharger »

LetMeSleep wrote:The version of NAIS is too fast.

Screw this album.
:lol:
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by B »

I either forgot or never knew these were numbered. Anyone know how many were made?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2779
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by Buby »

B wrote:I either forgot or never knew these were numbered. Anyone know how many were made?
Looks like the European pressing is the one that's numbered.
User avatar
oasisfan35
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4684
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:07 pm

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by oasisfan35 »

B wrote:I either forgot or never knew these were numbered. Anyone know how many were made?
Too many.
absinthe makes the heart grow fonder...
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Live on Ten Legs: Official Album Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

I have it, its a pretty cool item.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply