Election 2016

wease · Post by **wease** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:10 pm

And fucking his chair.

Strat · Post by **Strat** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:10 pm

Breaking news. Paul Ryan says he will no longer defend trump

What does that mean

Simple Torture · Post by **Simple Torture** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:11 pm

Strat wrote:Someone give me the important details please. i didnt watch

If you grab someone's vagina, it's not sexual assault. Vaginas for everyone!

Post by **Jorge** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:12 pm

Strat wrote:Breaking news. Paul Ryan says he will no longer defend trump

What does that mean

It means "I'm too much of a slimey Argo-looking coward to withdraw my endorsement but uhhh I don't like what he said"

McParadigm · Post by **McParadigm** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:35 pm

It means the two groups the party is in danger of losing big time, the Breitbart extremist crowd and the vast moderates, cannot simultaneously be reassured. And no one knows what to do. The part cannot win elections without moderates, but cannot survive without their base's most ideologically intense fringes. They allowed that particular fringe to insulate because they thought it meant they controlled them. Now the train is off the rails, the base is demanding proof of support, but it cannot be given while also repairing the damage Trump keeps doing.

McParadigm · Post by **McParadigm** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:38 pm

The best thing republican leaders could do for themselves right now is to stop trying to pretend that a republican civil war is something that MIGHT happen.

Post by **Green Habit** » Mon October 10, 2016 4:59 pm

theplatypus wrote:
Strat wrote:Breaking news. Paul Ryan says he will no longer defend trump

What does that mean
It means "I'm too much of a slimey Argo-looking coward to withdraw my endorsement but uhhh I don't like what he said"

Right, there's some amazing word parsing on Ryan's part here.

Strat · Post by **Strat** » Mon October 10, 2016 5:05 pm

so the donald really went after bill clinton after everything over the past few days? Lol. He really threatened to put her in jail if he was president? He called her the devil?

Good god. What a time to be alive.

McParadigm · Post by **McParadigm** » Mon October 10, 2016 5:08 pm

Strat wrote:so the donald really went after bill clinton after everything over the past few days? Lol. He really threatened to put her in jail if he was president? He called her the devil?

Good god. What a time to be alive.

And in doing so became a champion for the ugliest part of the base in a way that will end the Republican Party as we have known it.

bada · Post by **bada** » Mon October 10, 2016 5:13 pm

Looks for the Whig party to make a comeback.

Bi_3 · Post by **Bi_3** » Mon October 10, 2016 5:48 pm

bada wrote:Looks for the Whig party to make a comeback.

McParadigm · Post by **McParadigm** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:03 pm

Yup.

We had Congress. Getting the presidency would've given us the court, too. And Trump voters burned it all down. Short-sighted idiots.

Post by B » Mon October 10, 2016 6:04 pm

Warren Buffett wrote:I have paid federal income tax every year since 1944, when I was 13. (Though, being a slow starter, I owed only $7 in tax that year.) I have copies of all 72 of my returns and none uses a carryforward.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/10/10/pf/taxe ... d=29765822

McParadigm · Post by **McParadigm** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:18 pm

That Donald intended to bring the accusers to his family seating, forcing Bill to greet them on camera, blows my mind. It's such a childish stunt.

Strat · Post by **Strat** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:25 pm

McParadigm wrote:That Donald intended to bring the accusers to his family seating, forcing Bill to greet them on camera, blows my mind. It's such a childish stunt.

next time hillary should bring the hundreds of women, muslims, mexicans, disabled, and tax paying americans to the debate

Simple Torture · Post by **Simple Torture** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:25 pm

Post by **Jorge** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:36 pm

Goddammit. I had the same thought. I should have made that.

Simple Torture · Post by **Simple Torture** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:40 pm

McParadigm wrote:That Donald intended to bring the accusers to his family seating, forcing Bill to greet them on camera, blows my mind. It's such a childish stunt.

To review: a man who's been accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women tried to encourage a group of women to confront a man they've accused of sexual harassment and assault. Once again, we've all been #KenBoned by 2016.

A Trump surrogate on CNN last night actually argued that it was demeaning, disrespectful, and sexist to call this a "stunt," especially since Hillary Clinton has said many times that all victims of sexual assault should have their stories heard and that justice should always be sought. I was just a young teen during most of the Clinton sex scandals of the 1990s, so I don't remember: did Hillary ever make public statements about not believing Bill's accusers, or say anything demeaning or harsh about them? Or is all of this just imagined/inferred from the fact that she stayed with her husband?

Post by B » Mon October 10, 2016 6:43 pm

Simple Torture wrote:
McParadigm wrote:That Donald intended to bring the accusers to his family seating, forcing Bill to greet them on camera, blows my mind. It's such a childish stunt.
To review: a man who's been accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women tried to encourage a group of women to confront a man they've accused of sexual harassment and assault. Once again, we've all been #KenBoned by 2016.

A Trump surrogate on CNN last night actually argued that it was demeaning, disrespectful, and sexist to call this a "stunt," especially since Hillary Clinton has said many times that all victims of sexual assault should have their stories heard and that justice should always be sought. I was just a young teen during most of the Clinton sex scandals of the 1990s, so I don't remember: did Hillary ever make public statements about not believing Bill's accusers, or say anything demeaning or harsh about them? Or is all of this just imagined/inferred from the fact that she stayed with her husband?

She made a mean face at one of them once.

Simple Torture · Post by **Simple Torture** » Mon October 10, 2016 6:46 pm

B wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
McParadigm wrote:That Donald intended to bring the accusers to his family seating, forcing Bill to greet them on camera, blows my mind. It's such a childish stunt.
To review: a man who's been accused of sexual harassment and assault by numerous women tried to encourage a group of women to confront a man they've accused of sexual harassment and assault. Once again, we've all been #KenBoned by 2016.

A Trump surrogate on CNN last night actually argued that it was demeaning, disrespectful, and sexist to call this a "stunt," especially since Hillary Clinton has said many times that all victims of sexual assault should have their stories heard and that justice should always be sought. I was just a young teen during most of the Clinton sex scandals of the 1990s, so I don't remember: did Hillary ever make public statements about not believing Bill's accusers, or say anything demeaning or harsh about them? Or is all of this just imagined/inferred from the fact that she stayed with her husband?
She made a mean face at one of them once.

"Shame on you! Shame on you!"

Red Mosquito

Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016

Re: Election 2016