LoathedVermin72 wrote:Some of the political shit Armond White posts just baffles me. I don't know how he can be so brilliant in so many ways and so obtuse in others.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Some of the political shit Armond White posts just baffles me. I don't know how he can be so brilliant in so many ways and so obtuse in others.
And for those for whom this is their first introduction to Armond White, I urge you to not go seeking out any of his other opinions if you value your sanity.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Some of the political shit Armond White posts just baffles me. I don't know how he can be so brilliant in so many ways and so obtuse in others.
And for those for whom this is their first introduction to Armond White, I urge you to not go seeking out any of his other opinions if you value your sanity.
"Jesus...can I tea bag this woman for her horrible ideas?" -Peyton Manning
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Some of the political shit Armond White posts just baffles me. I don't know how he can be so brilliant in so many ways and so obtuse in others.
And for those for whom this is their first introduction to Armond White, I urge you to not go seeking out any of his other opinions if you value your sanity.
He didn't write this though, yeah? Did he repost it approvingly or something?
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Some of the political shit Armond White posts just baffles me. I don't know how he can be so brilliant in so many ways and so obtuse in others.
And for those for whom this is their first introduction to Armond White, I urge you to not go seeking out any of his other opinions if you value your sanity.
To be clear, he did not write this piece. He just shared it on Facebook.
My wife's sister supported it on Facebook. And got 6 likes from women.
I mean, I just read a lengthy piece written by a college educated woman about how women shouldn't have the right to vote, for no reason other than to put an orange moron into office. This must be what it's like to go insane.
538 published an article yesterday that included the thought experiment: what would the election look like if only men could vote? What would it look like if only women could vote? They used the current breakdown in gender for the most recent polls in each state, and found that if only men voted, Trump would win 350-188 (which is actually very close to their projections for Clinton right now) and that if only women voted, Clinton would blow him out 458-80 (which would be the largest victory since Reagan '84). Remember: this was just a thought experiment.
Simple Torture wrote:538 published an article yesterday that included the thought experiment: what would the election look like if only men could vote? What would it look like if only women could vote? They used the current breakdown in gender for the most recent polls in each state, and found that if only men voted, Trump would win 350-188 (which is actually very close to their projections for Clinton right now) and that if only women voted, Clinton would blow him out 458-80 (which would be the largest victory since Reagan '84). Remember: this was just a thought experiment.
