Election 2016

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

I think I gave Strat an aneurysm by mentioning the 2020 election yesterday, but today I also had this thought: is John Kasich better positioned than anyone else to give it a go? Never even pretended he'd support Trump, governor of a very important state, still pretty popular, sneakily conservative on social issues to help rile up another part of the base. Thoughts?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by McParadigm »

Simple Torture wrote:I think I gave Strat an aneurysm by mentioning the 2020 election yesterday, but today I also had this thought: is John Kasich better positioned than anyone else to give it a go? Never even pretended he'd support Trump, governor of a very important state, still pretty popular, sneakily conservative on social issues to help rile up another part of the base. Thoughts?
He'd probably do well. Add Ben Sasse or someone else untainted and you'd have something. I'd be surprised if that happens tho.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Wed January 14, 2026 6:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Bi_3 »

Another accidental technical glitch:






Bonus: professional news anchor says "that sucks"
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: Election 2016

Post by dprival78 »

User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by McParadigm »

They are talking about possible "political reform" talking points in that snippet above. So "dicey" means "saying this would open her up to attacks from the right," which is pretty accurate.

If there's something astonishing about these emails dumps, it's that there's been so little there that's astonishing. "Gasp! Hillary's aides got upset that she called herself a moderate in an interview after they had talked her up as progressive! Scandal!"
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: Election 2016

Post by dprival78 »

another establishment politician worried about the truth coming out

let's expose all of these crooks
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Election 2016

Post by Norah »

Simple Torture wrote:I think I gave Strat an aneurysm by mentioning the 2020 election yesterday, but today I also had this thought: is John Kasich better positioned than anyone else to give it a go? Never even pretended he'd support Trump, governor of a very important state, still pretty popular, sneakily conservative on social issues to help rile up another part of the base. Thoughts?
This shit scares the hell out of me. Republicans that were rightfully scary before Trump entered the picture will seem reasonable by comparison.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Election 2016

Post by Jorge »

dprival78 wrote:
another establishment politician worried about the truth coming out

let's expose all of these crooks
#DrainTheSwamp
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2150
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: Election 2016

Post by dprival78 »

McParadigm wrote:They are talking about possible "political reform" talking points in that snippet above. So "dicey" means "saying this would open her up to attacks from the right," which is pretty accurate.

If there's something astonishing about these emails dumps, it's that there's been so little there that's astonishing. "Gasp! Hillary's aides got upset that she called herself a moderate in an interview after they had talked her up as progressive! Scandal!"
there are many more substantial things that have come out, aside from the above which shows her own team knows how dirty she is. to that point..

Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-press-b ... 1476401308

how could anyone defend this?
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by bada »

Why one shoe?
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

one foot in the door, the other one in the gutter
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2016

Post by Strat »

dprival78 wrote:
McParadigm wrote:They are talking about possible "political reform" talking points in that snippet above. So "dicey" means "saying this would open her up to attacks from the right," which is pretty accurate.

If there's something astonishing about these emails dumps, it's that there's been so little there that's astonishing. "Gasp! Hillary's aides got upset that she called herself a moderate in an interview after they had talked her up as progressive! Scandal!"
there are many more substantial things that have come out, aside from the above which shows her own team knows how dirty she is. to that point..

Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-press-b ... 1476401308

how could anyone defend this?
Image
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: Election 2016

Post by digster »

The problem for Trump seems to be that both of these things (Trump's many issues and Clinton's Wikileaks e-mails) basically reinforce what we already knew about each candidate, namely that Clinton is a compromised 'insider' politician , while Trump is vile scum. Presently, it seems that the Trump revelation that he is what everyone feared he is is having a larger impact than having Clinton's reputation be reinforced.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Bi_3 »

digster wrote:The problem for Trump seems to be that both of these things (Trump's many issues and Clinton's Wikileaks e-mails) basically reinforce what we already knew about each candidate, namely that Clinton is a compromised 'insider' politician , while Trump is vile scum. Presently, it seems that the Trump revelation that he is what everyone feared he is is having a larger impact than having Clinton's reputation be reinforced.
That's certainly what the media is portraying.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Election 2016

Post by Green Habit »

Good thing the debate's tonight, I'm about ready to be done with this election.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21690
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2016

Post by Simple Torture »

Green Habit wrote:Good thing the debate's tonight, I'm about ready to be done with this election.
My wife used the word "mulatto" recently in conversation, somehow not realizing that it can be taken offensively. I've brought it up about 100x since then.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Election 2016

Post by Norah »

mulatto is offensive?
Post Reply