Dude.dimejinky99 wrote:Can States elect to leave the union?
Be interesting if California lead that charge.
Is there a way that's allowed happen? Referendum in the state?
- Spoiler: show
Dude.dimejinky99 wrote:Can States elect to leave the union?
Be interesting if California lead that charge.
Is there a way that's allowed happen? Referendum in the state?
McParadigm wrote:lol
Oh my god this is one of my favorite posts.dimejinky99 wrote:Can States elect to leave the union?
Be interesting if California lead that charge.
Is there a way that's allowed happen? Referendum in the state?
Dime is the Insane Clone Posse of American politics.bart wrote:Oh my god this is one of my favorite posts.dimejinky99 wrote:Can States elect to leave the union?
Be interesting if California lead that charge.
Is there a way that's allowed happen? Referendum in the state?
McParadigm wrote:lol
McParadigm wrote:lol
Simple Torture wrote:The non-sarcastic answer is that it's only been actually attempted once, and that led to the Civil War. There have been some court cases pertaining to it, I think, and the ruling was something like a unilateral decision to leave is unconstitutional--which sort of leaves the door open for a state to ask to leave, and then the federal government giving permission. California's economy is larger than all but 6 countries in the world (yes, you read that correctly), so the feds would never let it leave.
Trump better not mess with our surf breaks..We have all surfed shifty beach breaks. We've seen perfect beach breaks pumping beautiful A-frames when suddenly, in a matter of days or even hours, conditions change and the same peak no longer exists...I can't live like that...cutuphalfdead wrote:splitting up the us is a terrible idea
A law against a state leaving is as illogical as an "illegal war"--both acts are the very essence of the rejection of law. So my serious is answer is: yes, a state can leave, but it won't leave because they would get crushed by the other states.Simple Torture wrote:The non-sarcastic answer is that it's only been actually attempted once, and that led to the Civil War. There have been some court cases pertaining to it, I think, and the ruling was something like a unilateral decision to leave is unconstitutional--which sort of leaves the door open for a state to ask to leave, and then the federal government giving permission. California's economy is larger than all but 6 countries in the world (yes, you read that correctly), so the feds would never let it leave.
Read GH's post. The divide in this country does not follow state lines.dimejinky99 wrote:Can't see all the armed rednecks getting worked up about the libtard states wantin to leave. They'd probably join in.
Again, any attempted secession by whoever's leading California would also result in the state completely falling apart into several, maybe even dozens, of substates consisting of areas that don't want to go along with the secession. It would be nowhere near a top 10 world economy after that splintering.dimejinky99 wrote:Just read that. Think that same divide is worldwide now in every country.
CA could afford it and be self sustaining if it left though I reckon.
And if a frog had wings, it wouldn't bump its booty.dimejinky99 wrote:CA could afford it and be self sustaining if it left though I reckon.
McParadigm wrote:lol