Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Self »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Self wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Electromatic wrote:Well, it's a 4 game season gents.
and one of those games got flexed to Sunday night football :D Bucs and Cowboys are in prime time and i think its the first time for the Bucs to be a Sunday night game in 8 years.

Saints
Cowboys
Saints
Panthers
The key game I see is whichever one is at New Orleans. If the Bucs win that I can see 10-6, if not then 9-7--and usually 10 wins is the deciding factor toward getting into the playoffs.
the 10-6 Buccaneers of 2010 disagree with you
usually
I know, it's just funny that the one example that goes against your theory is actually the Bucs, lol.
The Patriots were 11-5 in 2008 and didn't get in.
Yes and clearly that stings for you as the Patriots' woes are very similar to the Bucs'. :/
That wasn't my point, but until Parcells got here our woes weren't all that dissimilar, pal.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by jwfocker »

Regardless of making the playoffs I'm just pleased with the play on the field. Huge improvement.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

Self wrote:The Patriots were 11-5 in 2008 and didn't get in.
Same with the 1985 Broncos. Hell, the 2015 Super Bowl Champion Broncos could have missed the playoffs if they went 11-5.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

Self wrote:That wasn't my point, but until Parcells got here our woes weren't all that dissimilar, pal.
The Pats were only really bad during that short abyss in the late 80s-early 90s between Sullivan and Kraft owning the team. The Bucs have had much longer stretches of terrible play.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

jwfocker wrote:Regardless of making the playoffs I'm just pleased with the play on the field. Huge improvement.
100% agree, for quite a long time now if their opponent would score i would just feel like the game was already over, its a great feeling knowing that they are in every game and can come from behind to win.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Self wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Self wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Electromatic wrote:Well, it's a 4 game season gents.
and one of those games got flexed to Sunday night football :D Bucs and Cowboys are in prime time and i think its the first time for the Bucs to be a Sunday night game in 8 years.

Saints
Cowboys
Saints
Panthers
The key game I see is whichever one is at New Orleans. If the Bucs win that I can see 10-6, if not then 9-7--and usually 10 wins is the deciding factor toward getting into the playoffs.
the 10-6 Buccaneers of 2010 disagree with you
usually
I know, it's just funny that the one example that goes against your theory is actually the Bucs, lol.
The Patriots were 11-5 in 2008 and didn't get in.
Yes and clearly that stings for you as the Patriots' woes are very similar to the Bucs'. :/
That wasn't my point, but until Parcells got here our woes weren't all that dissimilar, pal.
I love you
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Self »

Green Habit wrote:
Self wrote:That wasn't my point, but until Parcells got here our woes weren't all that dissimilar, pal.
The Pats were only really bad during that short abyss in the late 80s-early 90s between Sullivan and Kraft owning the team. The Bucs have had much longer stretches of terrible play.
I started following during the mid 80s, so that stretch seemed a lot worse than it probably was.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4663
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Self »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Self wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Self wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
Electromatic wrote:Well, it's a 4 game season gents.
and one of those games got flexed to Sunday night football :D Bucs and Cowboys are in prime time and i think its the first time for the Bucs to be a Sunday night game in 8 years.

Saints
Cowboys
Saints
Panthers
The key game I see is whichever one is at New Orleans. If the Bucs win that I can see 10-6, if not then 9-7--and usually 10 wins is the deciding factor toward getting into the playoffs.
the 10-6 Buccaneers of 2010 disagree with you
usually
I know, it's just funny that the one example that goes against your theory is actually the Bucs, lol.
The Patriots were 11-5 in 2008 and didn't get in.
Yes and clearly that stings for you as the Patriots' woes are very similar to the Bucs'. :/
That wasn't my point, but until Parcells got here our woes weren't all that dissimilar, pal.
I love you
I know.
Spoiler: show
:heartbeat:
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Cecil Shorts out for the season.

Also, just read about a really good punter at some midwestern school, so I guess we know where the Bucs will be using their first pick next draft.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Cecil Shorts out for the season.

Also, just read about a really good punter at some midwestern school, so I guess we know where the Bucs will be using their first pick next draft.
if it wasnt for how well anger has been doing lately i would think that might be something to worry about. now they will probably make anger the highest paid punter of all time a kill any cap space they have , but we are Bucs fans, we cant have everything be good all at once lol
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Green Habit »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:but we are Bucs fans, we cant have everything be good all at once lol
They picked the absolute perfect time in their franchise's history to have everything go their way.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

5 in a row. Go Bucs
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by jwfocker »

Reality doesn't make sense right now.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52023
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

jwfocker wrote:Reality doesn't make sense right now.
Those safeties have to stop, though. Second one in three weeks. Huge momentum killer
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by jwfocker »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Reality doesn't make sense right now.
Those safeties have to stop, though. Second one in three weeks. Huge momentum killer

I don't know man. I think it adds something very visceral to the game.

Also Josh Huff probably won't be on the team next week. Pretty awful game by the new guy.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

jwfocker wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
jwfocker wrote:Reality doesn't make sense right now.
Those safeties have to stop, though. Second one in three weeks. Huge momentum killer

I don't know man. I think it adds something very visceral to the game.

Also Josh Huff probably won't be on the team next week. Pretty awful game by the new guy.
that was pretty awful on his part, and i learned that the free kick is not technically a punt since you still get a penalty if it goes out of bounds, i didnt realize that at all.

the Bucs are becoming the kings of the ugly wins lol, but a win is a win, hopefully the D can keep it up and the O can do much better then this week and the Cowboys can be another W for us.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by jwfocker »

That O-line is a major concern. Smith and who ever has been lining up at right tackle have been straight trash for a couple weeks and it seems like they're getting worse.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

jwfocker wrote:That O-line is a major concern. Smith and who ever has been lining up at right tackle have been straight trash for a couple weeks and it seems like they're getting worse.
man was it obvious last night that the o line needs to be the main focus this off season.

now the Bucs need to win the last 2 and need a bit of help
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by jwfocker »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
jwfocker wrote:That O-line is a major concern. Smith and who ever has been lining up at right tackle have been straight trash for a couple weeks and it seems like they're getting worse.
man was it obvious last night that the o line needs to be the main focus this off season.

now the Bucs need to win the last 2 and need a bit of help

It was such a bad performance and what makes it so infuriating - the o-line play dropped off the cliff right when the team needed them the most. Just awful. Gosder was useless. literally a empty vessel of garbage. Whiffing on that screen play was the final straw. Winston played a epic 3rd quarter but lost his way a bit in the 4th quarter. He was pressing. He was rushing his throws, throwing high, and getting hit on every throw and a lot of that is on him but the 0-line did not help at all.

No running game. No weapons outside of Evans and Brate. The o-line can't hold their blocks for even a 3 second drop.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

jwfocker wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
jwfocker wrote:That O-line is a major concern. Smith and who ever has been lining up at right tackle have been straight trash for a couple weeks and it seems like they're getting worse.
man was it obvious last night that the o line needs to be the main focus this off season.

now the Bucs need to win the last 2 and need a bit of help

It was such a bad performance and what makes it so infuriating - the o-line play dropped off the cliff right when the team needed them the most. Just awful. Gosder was useless. literally a empty vessel of garbage. Whiffing on that screen play was the final straw. Winston played a epic 3rd quarter but lost his way a bit in the 4th quarter. He was pressing. He was rushing his throws, throwing high, and getting hit on every throw and a lot of that is on him but the 0-line did not help at all.

No running game. No weapons outside of Evans and Brate. The o-line can't hold their blocks for even a 3 second drop.
i kinda hope they dont try drafting another running back though, i think the combo of Martin, Rodgers and Simms is strong if they have a line in front of them that can create some holes to run through, im not sure what FA or the draft is looking like for O line help, especially drafting pretty late this year but they need to get some new players in there for sure
Post Reply