Dave O'Brien is coming back as well. How do you feel now?numbers wrote:I want to die.cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year.
Boston Red Sox Thread
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
McParadigm wrote:lol
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35960
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
big papi isn't thoughSimple Torture wrote:Dave O'Brien is coming back as well. How do you feel now?numbers wrote:I want to die.cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year.
That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
He's definitely far down on the list of reasons why they lost this series, but he's still a terrible manager and should be gone.MattA75 wrote:I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year.
That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
They didn't lose the game because of it, but his decision to pinch hit for Benintendi in the 6th(maybe 7th) was beyond the pale.cutuphalfdead wrote:He's definitely far down on the list of reasons why they lost this series, but he's still a terrible manager and should be gone.MattA75 wrote:I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year.
That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I kind of want Ortiz to change his mind and play one more season just so people will hopefully realize how stupid the league-wide going away parties are.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I'll probably end up being wrong, but I think the Red Sox are in on Encarnacion, despite what the beat writers at Pravda, I mean the Globe, are saying. If they really wanted Beltran as badly as the beat guys reported, they def would have matched 1/16. Same goes for Holliday. They have to do SOMETHING, and the way the market keeps shrinking for EE, I think that's where they are going. They have to know that guys like Napoli are not an option.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I think they're in on him, too. They've been too openly against spending money for it to be true.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
numbers wrote:I'll probably end up being wrong, but I think the Red Sox are in on Encarnacion, despite what the beat writers at Pravda, I mean the Globe, are saying. If they really wanted Beltran as badly as the beat guys reported, they def would have matched 1/16. Same goes for Holliday. They have to do SOMETHING, and the way the market keeps shrinking for EE, I think that's where they are going. They have to know that guys like Napoli are not an option.
You're going to just trade for Cabrera. You'll be fine.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
DONE.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I didn't say I wanted him!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
DONE.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
McParadigm wrote:lol
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I dunno, if the cost was just eating his money I might be in on that.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't say I wanted him!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
DONE.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't say I wanted him!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
DONE.
nope. Now Batting 4th, Designated Hitter Victor Martinez.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I thought you followed me on Twitter?Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
You don't follow him on twitter then.Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
cutuphalfdead wrote:You don't follow him on twitter then.Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
classic Chud.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
If it was just money, fine I guess but I'm not comfortable relying on him in the heart of my lineup these days.numbers wrote:I dunno, if the cost was just eating his money I might be in on that.cutuphalfdead wrote:I didn't say I wanted him!@SkitchP wrote:cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
DONE.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Boston Red Sox Thread
I do, just haven't checked in there today. I am eager to go read that meltdown now, though.numbers wrote:I thought you followed me on Twitter?Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:
http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
McParadigm wrote:lol