Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year. :?
I want to die.
Dave O'Brien is coming back as well. How do you feel now?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35960
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by spike »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year. :?
I want to die.
Dave O'Brien is coming back as well. How do you feel now?
big papi isn't though
MattA75
AnalLog
Posts: 1504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by MattA75 »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year. :?
I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)

That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

MattA75 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year. :?
I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)

That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
He's definitely far down on the list of reasons why they lost this series, but he's still a terrible manager and should be gone.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
MattA75 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Farrell is back next year. :?
I'm far from a fan, but is it really his fault that Porcello and Price shit the bed in games 1 and 2, and the rest of his rotation sucks so he had to rely on Clay Buccholz in game 3? (and don't give me the Steven Wright argument)

That's not to say he didn't make any questionable moves (especially in game 3), I just have a hard time pinning the series on him. And believe me, I'd love to.
He's definitely far down on the list of reasons why they lost this series, but he's still a terrible manager and should be gone.
They didn't lose the game because of it, but his decision to pinch hit for Benintendi in the 6th(maybe 7th) was beyond the pale.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

I kind of want Ortiz to change his mind and play one more season just so people will hopefully realize how stupid the league-wide going away parties are.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I'll probably end up being wrong, but I think the Red Sox are in on Encarnacion, despite what the beat writers at Pravda, I mean the Globe, are saying. If they really wanted Beltran as badly as the beat guys reported, they def would have matched 1/16. Same goes for Holliday. They have to do SOMETHING, and the way the market keeps shrinking for EE, I think that's where they are going. They have to know that guys like Napoli are not an option.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

I think they're in on him, too. They've been too openly against spending money for it to be true.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

numbers wrote:I'll probably end up being wrong, but I think the Red Sox are in on Encarnacion, despite what the beat writers at Pravda, I mean the Globe, are saying. If they really wanted Beltran as badly as the beat guys reported, they def would have matched 1/16. Same goes for Holliday. They have to do SOMETHING, and the way the market keeps shrinking for EE, I think that's where they are going. They have to know that guys like Napoli are not an option.

You're going to just trade for Cabrera. You'll be fine.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.

DONE.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

@SkitchP wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.

DONE.
I didn't say I wanted him!
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.

DONE.
I didn't say I wanted him!
I dunno, if the cost was just eating his money I might be in on that.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.

DONE.
I didn't say I wanted him!

nope. Now Batting 4th, Designated Hitter Victor Martinez.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
I thought you followed me on Twitter?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
You don't follow him on twitter then.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by @SkitchP »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
You don't follow him on twitter then.

classic Chud.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37455
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:We'll probably trade for V-Mart, if anything.

DONE.
I didn't say I wanted him!
I dunno, if the cost was just eating his money I might be in on that.
If it was just money, fine I guess but I'm not comfortable relying on him in the heart of my lineup these days.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:This news sort of flew under the radar today without numbers having an aneurysm, so that's good, at least:

http://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/1821 ... act-option
I thought you followed me on Twitter?
I do, just haven't checked in there today. I am eager to go read that meltdown now, though.
McParadigm wrote:lol
Post Reply