MLB

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

Coach wrote:Price needs to pitch better for this to mean anything.
So if Price has the exact same year he had last year, and Sale does the same, it wont improve the Red Sox at all?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Also, you're wrong.

Image
He wasn't great down the stretch. Maybe he just missed Drake LaRoche though.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37476
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

verb_to_trust wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Also, you're wrong.

Image
He wasn't great down the stretch. Maybe he just missed Drake LaRoche though.
What does down the stretch even mean when your team is out of it?
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15615
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: MLB

Post by Chris_H_2 »

This is one of those trades where you go through a whole range of emotions. You're ecstatic that you got a top 5 pitcher. But then there's a piece of you that doesn't want to part with that great of talent. But then you realize just how much better your starting staff will be. Then you hope against all hopes that none of the guys you gave up becomes the next Mike Trout. That's when you know it was a good trade for both teams.

This was a great trade for Boston, considering the type of pitcher Sale is, his age, how much control the team has, and the modest salary they have to pay.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: MLB

Post by Coach »

numbers wrote:
Coach wrote:Price needs to pitch better for this to mean anything.
So if Price has the exact same year he had last year, and Sale does the same, it wont improve the Red Sox at all?
They are improved, but I think you need Price back at his best and see it follow into the playoffs for it to mean anything.

I think it's a great trade and I'm all for it.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

Red Sox better have loose fitting Throwbacks!!
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

To play devil's advocate... how much better does it actually make them compared to last year? It's a huge addition, but they also replaced Ortiz with Moreland. Plus, they got full, healthy seasons from pretty much all of their important players last year.

They're probably the team to beat in the AL right now, but it's not like they've taken a big step forward over 2016.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

On a related note... holy shit, White Sox. That's how you rebuild.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

philpritchard wrote:On a related note... holy shit, White Sox. That's how you rebuild.
Courtesy Fox Sports...

The #WhiteSox acquisitions the past 2 days:

Yoan Moncada
Michael Kopech
Luis Basabe
Victor Diaz
Lucas Giolito
Reynaldo Lopez
Dane Dunning
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37476
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:To play devil's advocate... how much better does it actually make them compared to last year? It's a huge addition, but they also replaced Ortiz with Moreland. Plus, they got full, healthy seasons from pretty much all of their important players last year.

They're probably the team to beat in the AL right now, but it's not like they've taken a big step forward over 2016.
Agreed for the most part. I'm holding out hope that they trade one of their now redundant starting pitchers for an actual replacement for Ortiz and Moreland can just be a backup player.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

I don't think they make any more real additions before the season starts, although, if Encarnacion is still sitting out there a few weeks from now and can be had for 3/50 or something like that I don't know how they pass.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: MLB

Post by Electromatic »

We are living in a time where possibly getting the last 3 outs in a baseball game is worth 17.2 million per year.

Wow. Enjoy those luxury seats Yankees fans.
User avatar
pnjguy
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 558
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 5:02 pm

Re: MLB

Post by pnjguy »

Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:On a related note... holy shit, White Sox. That's how you rebuild.
Courtesy Fox Sports...

The #WhiteSox acquisitions the past 2 days:

Yoan Moncada
Michael Kopech
Luis Basabe
Victor Diaz
Lucas Giolito
Reynaldo Lopez
Dane Dunning
And 7 months to still trade Quintana, Frazier, Robertson, Abreu, Jones.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

pnjguy wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:On a related note... holy shit, White Sox. That's how you rebuild.
Courtesy Fox Sports...

The #WhiteSox acquisitions the past 2 days:

Yoan Moncada
Michael Kopech
Luis Basabe
Victor Diaz
Lucas Giolito
Reynaldo Lopez
Dane Dunning
And 7 months to still trade Quintana, Frazier, Robertson, Abreu, Jones.
There's just as good a chance the White Sox are the 1998 Marlins in a few years.
User avatar
The Argonaut
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11950
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:53 pm
Location: in the air tonight

Re: MLB

Post by The Argonaut »

Any good theories on why Matt Holliday's one-year, $13 million dollar contract with the Yanks includes a very unusual one-team-no-trade clause? He can only block trades that send him to the Oakland A's. Why does Holliday hate Oakland?
Please consider voting for me
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

The Argonaut wrote:Any good theories on why Matt Holliday's one-year, $13 million dollar contract with the Yanks includes a very unusual one-team-no-trade clause? He can only block trades that send him to the Oakland A's. Why does Holliday hate Oakland?
Their facilities are garbage and Moneyball hasn't worked since i was in high school. Makes sense really.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: MLB

Post by philpritchard »

verb_to_trust wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Any good theories on why Matt Holliday's one-year, $13 million dollar contract with the Yanks includes a very unusual one-team-no-trade clause? He can only block trades that send him to the Oakland A's. Why does Holliday hate Oakland?
Their facilities are garbage and Moneyball hasn't worked since i was in high school. Makes sense really.
You know why "Moneyball" doesn't work? Because every team is using it now, so there's no longer a competitive advantage.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37476
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: MLB

Post by Norah »

philpritchard wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:
The Argonaut wrote:Any good theories on why Matt Holliday's one-year, $13 million dollar contract with the Yanks includes a very unusual one-team-no-trade clause? He can only block trades that send him to the Oakland A's. Why does Holliday hate Oakland?
Their facilities are garbage and Moneyball hasn't worked since i was in high school. Makes sense really.
You know why "Moneyball" doesn't work? Because every team is using it now, so there's no longer a competitive advantage.
In a sense it does work because if you stopped doing it you'd be at a competitive disadvantage.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: MLB

Post by numbers »

Did moneyball ever really work?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: MLB

Post by verb_to_trust »

When Barry Zito played for the A's it sort of did until Oakland would inevitably crap themselves against the Yankees.
Dick/Balls
Post Reply