The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48515
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
:lol:

Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48515
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
:lol:

Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
do you do the physical discs from netflix?
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Just the name sounds like a joke.
i would almost see anything with ed norton, but not this...i'm so mad at him
Fingers crossed the movie is nothing like the trailers. Because... christ. But the cast is so fucking great.
unless ebert comes back from the grave and gives it at least 3 stars i'm out
:lol:

Right now it's a Netflix-er, for me. Maybe reviews will change that. I don't know. But Ed Norton's in it, so I will see it eventually.
do you do the physical discs from netflix?
You know it. I still get 2, actually.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 12:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

The book is good, not great. But certainly give you a lot to think about and has great dialogue/pacing. Should make a really fun film.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51692
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

I happy you're happy, friend.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52026
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

That movie Fist Fight looks funny
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12537
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by bada »

durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.

My 10 year old loves the Universal Monsters so I might end up having to seeing this.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Lol wut Tom Cruise is in the new Mummy movie?
I have a really hard time getting excited for the new Mummy movie.
I don't think there's a soul on this planet who expects us to feel otherwise.
Not even Alex Kurtzman?
Ok, it's understood that the people who made the movie probably want people to be excited for it. But outside of that circle, I think my point stands. It's an unnecessary reboot of a dated flick, starting an insane person and directed by a genre grunt.
I bet LV would be super excited if not for Kurtzman's involvement.
haha you called it. I love Cruise and am totally down for this in theory, but Kurtzman's involvement immediately makes me suspicious. That guy is cancer.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

tragabigzanda wrote:This looks promising. I did not read the book.

Promising how? Emma Watson looks incredibly bored...and the overall aesthetic is bland and generic as hell.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by Jorge »

It looks like a Black Mirror episode crossed with a YA novel.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by VinylGuy »

yeah i thought that....the song, the editing, emma watson...a figure like tom hanks...ugh.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85157
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by epilogue »

The aesthetic is dead on. It's all part of the point of the novel and what Egger's is trying to achieve. The art direction looks lights out. The movie could be a giant turd. It's too hard to tell from this first look. Could go either way. But there are things in this trailer that give me hope. These people at least read the book and seem to "get it." We'll see.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

My wife and best friend both love Dave Eggers and both violently hated that book
Post Reply