Ghostbusters (2016)

Books, movies, television...
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Where's that Mohawk pic of me, "the fuck you looking at" one?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

To be fair, I've never understood the term "emo." It seems like a generic insult that people throw when they can't think of a different insult, or they want to insult someone but they also don't want to be too harsh. It's a stupid fucking term that has never meant anything and continues to be meaningless.

Having made my thoughts clear on that word, I'll say now that I've never seen an "emo" pic of Ruddo.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33835
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post
was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by tragabigzanda »

Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
good post
was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.
I'm so into everything E.H. Ruddock it's sickening.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

MissYouAllDay wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.
Hello, friend.

I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?

Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).

Be well.
User avatar
MissYouAllDay
A Return To Form
Posts: 174
Joined: Sat July 16, 2016 2:04 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by MissYouAllDay »

Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

MissYouAllDay wrote:Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.
I didn't even notice you deleted your post before I responded. Weird. Oh, well. Have a great day, friend.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42769
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
MissYouAllDay wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.
Hello, friend.

I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?

Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).

Be well.
:shake:
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by BurtReynolds »

If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.
:lol:

Did you like any of the work he did on the US version of The Office?
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by stip »

Spy is so good
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

stip wrote:Spy is so good
Statham is brilliant in that
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by stip »

so is McCarthy and Bobby Cannavale
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47963
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

meh
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Ghostbusters (2016)

Post by @SkitchP »

durdencommatyler wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.

the thing about butt hurt is it's a debate ender. Because no matter how someone responds you can keep going back to "BUTT HURT"
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
Post Reply