Ghostbusters (2016)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Where's that Mohawk pic of me, "the fuck you looking at" one?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
To be fair, I've never understood the term "emo." It seems like a generic insult that people throw when they can't think of a different insult, or they want to insult someone but they also don't want to be too harsh. It's a stupid fucking term that has never meant anything and continues to be meaningless.
Having made my thoughts clear on that word, I'll say now that I've never seen an "emo" pic of Ruddo.
Having made my thoughts clear on that word, I'll say now that I've never seen an "emo" pic of Ruddo.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33839
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
good posttragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.LoathedVermin72 wrote:good posttragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
I'm so into everything E.H. Ruddock it's sickening.E.H. Ruddock wrote:was kind of a low hanging fruit though, so not really.LoathedVermin72 wrote:good posttragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Hello, friend.MissYouAllDay wrote:Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?
Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).
Be well.
- MissYouAllDay
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat July 16, 2016 2:04 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45832
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
I didn't even notice you deleted your post before I responded. Weird. Oh, well. Have a great day, friend.MissYouAllDay wrote:Jesus, now he's making up posts to get butt hurt about.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
durdencommatyler wrote:Hello, friend.MissYouAllDay wrote:Joey is sensitive about everything. Go back and look at how butt hurt he gets whenever someone insults this movie.tragabigzanda wrote:Why's Joey so sensitivite about this? Seems sort of emo.
I'm not sure we've posted much together. I'm "Joey." How are you? I think you've got me all backwards, pal. While I do identify as a sensitive person, I wouldn't say that I'm sensitive about this movie at all. Butt hurt? That's another completely stupid expression. But I hope you'll find that I am not at all "butt hurt" by anyone insulting this movie. As I've said before in this thread, the movie itself, as a film, isn't great. It's fun and I found it entertaining and more importantly very important to the landscape of cinema. But I certainly don't care if others dislike or even hate the film. Opinions are opinions and nothing more. Whether or not any of you jabronies likes this movie is no skin off my sack, friend. People like different things, and thank god for that, amirite?
Anyway, I hope we can continue to post cordial manner as we move forward. I look forward to having fun posting with you and building a relationship as strong as the one I have with Ruddo and LV and trag and TVG (all posters who didn't like the film and have very strong opinions that differ from mine).
Be well.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45832
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
BurtReynolds wrote:If Paul Feig is never allowed to make another movie, I will consider this movie a smashing success.
Did you like any of the work he did on the US version of The Office?
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Statham is brilliant in thatstip wrote:Spy is so good
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
so is McCarthy and Bobby Cannavale
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47966
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
meh
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
durdencommatyler wrote:It's completely stupid. But yeah it's fun.BurtReynolds wrote:Butt hurt is one of my favorite terms.
the thing about butt hurt is it's a debate ender. Because no matter how someone responds you can keep going back to "BUTT HURT"
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr