Wonder Woman (2017)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by stip »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:OMG shut up about BVS, you dummies. If you think it's messy that's one thing. If you think it was fucked up by the studio or somehow compromised, you are a dork.
i dont think it was the studio - i was commenting more on gloom and doom prereporting
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by stip »

theplatypus wrote:
Strat wrote:You obviously have a better grasp on Snyders career and the studios involvement here so i wont argue that! Though, the fact that they are trying to rival Marvel here and shoehorn all these characters into the films......

I think that was the downfall and makes it obvious that Snyder had to make concessions in story telling.
The absolute worst parts of BvS, the parts that even its most ardent apologists will decry, are the two sequences that are completely extraneous to the narrative: the Flash vision (immediately after the "Knightmare") and Wonder Woman clicking through Quicktime files. If I had to guess which scenes came from studio notes, I'd say those were it
i love the word ardent
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by B »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:OMG shut up about BVS, you dummies. If you think it's messy that's one thing. If you think it was fucked up by the studio or somehow compromised, you are a dork.
What if I think it was messy, and I HEARD it was fucked up by the studio?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

B wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:OMG shut up about BVS, you dummies. If you think it's messy that's one thing. If you think it was fucked up by the studio or somehow compromised, you are a dork.
What if I think it was messy, and I HEARD it was fucked up by the studio?
then you are a dorky one thing
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by stip »

20 minutes or so of this was just screened for a number of movie site critics and they early reports are very favorable, so fingers crossed.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

bummer
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by bada »

First reactions on twitter are positive.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by epilogue »

I think this is the most excited about a comic movie I've been since The Dark Knight. I'm pretty pumped to see this, team.
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by doone »

This is the only DC release that has caught my interest. I might even go see it in a theatre.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by epilogue »

doone wrote:This is the only DC release that has caught my interest. I might even go see it in a theatre.
:bammer:
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by @SkitchP »

My only interest in this is that Gal Gadot is REALLY pretty.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I really don't want this to suck. I need DC to be good.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42771
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by VinylGuy »

@SkitchP wrote:My only interest in this is that Gal Gadot is REALLY pretty.
she is gorgeous.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:I really don't want this to suck. I need DC to be good.
It's a little too late for that, isn't it?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I really don't want this to suck. I need DC to be good.
It's a little too late for that, isn't it?
So far the only misfire for me has been Suicide Squad
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Oh I didn't know you haven't seen BvS yet.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by wease »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I didn't know you haven't seen BvS yet.
:thumbsup:
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33836
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I didn't know you haven't seen BvS yet.
It's only my 35th favorite movie, Ruddo
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45827
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by BurtReynolds »

durdencommatyler wrote:I think this is the most excited about a comic movie I've been since The Dark Knight. I'm pretty pumped to see this, team.
there is no chance in hell you don't love this.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Wonder Woman (2017)

Post by epilogue »

BurtReynolds wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I think this is the most excited about a comic movie I've been since The Dark Knight. I'm pretty pumped to see this, team.
there is no chance in hell you don't love this.
I mean, we'll see. It could be terrible. But I don't think so.
Post Reply