So did Jeff Reardon, let's throw him in there too.philpritchard wrote:Smith only really gets the kind of support he does because he held the save record for a while.
Will he be a Hall of Famer?
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Finally.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Kurt Warner
no Ty Law
Jason Taylor

no Ty Law
Jason Taylor
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22777
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
If he's really gone for good, I am wondering if anyone here wants to make a "pro" case for this fella:


McParadigm wrote:lol
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Seems to strike me as a modern day Phil Simms, in more way than one. Hopefully he's actually better at his post-retirement job than Simms, though.Simple Torture wrote:If he's really gone for good, I am wondering if anyone here wants to make a "pro" case for this fella:
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
no, I would not like to make a "pro" case for him.Simple Torture wrote:If he's really gone for good, I am wondering if anyone here wants to make a "pro" case for this fella:
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
If I was going to make the "pro" case for Romo, it'd be all about the per numbers, which are incredibly impressive.
ANY/PA: 7.03 (4th all-time)
Completition %: 65.3% (5th all-time)
Passer Rating: 97.1 (4th all-time)
Rodgers, Brady, and Manning are above him in 2 out of 3 of those categories, and besides a few outliers (like Chad Pennington in comp.%) you're looking at the best of the best in the pass-happy era. If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
ANY/PA: 7.03 (4th all-time)
Completition %: 65.3% (5th all-time)
Passer Rating: 97.1 (4th all-time)
Rodgers, Brady, and Manning are above him in 2 out of 3 of those categories, and besides a few outliers (like Chad Pennington in comp.%) you're looking at the best of the best in the pass-happy era. If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Shit, if you're going to put Romo in, then Bledsoe and Esiason almost have to get in too
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
To clarify: I'm imagining the case someone would have to make; I don't think he's in, ever. But I do think it'd be a similar case, just not exactly the same: yeah, his career was longer, but QBs tend to have longer careers than running backs anyways. And he was cut down by injuries right after his career-best season and a dominating playoff performance. If Dez Bryant catches that ball, I think the conversation might be different.Green Habit wrote:How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22777
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Dez did the catch that ball and the conversation should be different.Simple Torture wrote:To clarify: I'm imagining the case someone would have to make; I don't think he's in, ever. But I do think it'd be a similar case, just not exactly the same: yeah, his career was longer, but QBs tend to have longer careers than running backs anyways. And he was cut down by injuries right after his career-best season and a dominating playoff performance. If Dez Bryant catches that ball, I think the conversation might be different.Green Habit wrote:How so? The the big pro for Davis was dominating postseason performances that resulted in two rings, with the con being that he had a short career. Romo's a bit of the opposite: a longish, steady career of above average performance, but notoriously subpar playoff performances.Simple Torture wrote:If you wanted to argue Romo in, you'd basically be making a case similar to Terrell Davis.
So it goes.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
the NFL HoF is a joke.
Brian Mitchell hasn't even sniffed it, and he is number 2 all time, in combined all purpose yards behind only Jerry Rice (who played 6 or 7 more seasons.)
Don't even give me the argument he did it on special teams. the number of records he holds on special teams is insane.
Combined kickoff and punt return yards: 19,013
Combined kickoff and punt returns: 1,070
Kickoff return yards: 14,014
Kickoff returns: 607
Punt return yards: 4,999
Punt returns: 463
Fair catches: 231
Fair catches in a single season(2000): 33
All-purpose yards by any player against a single opponent: 3,076 against the Dallas Cowboys
Kickoff return yards in postseason: 875
Kickoff returns in postseason: 36
Punt return yards in postseason: 339
Punt returns in postseason: 34-tied with David Meggett
Combined return yards in postseason: 1,214
Combined returns in postseason: 70
Games with 100 all purpose yards: 118
Games with 200 all purpose yards: 15
All-purpose yards on Sunday games only: 20,818
All-purpose yards in a single decade (1990–1999): 16,905
Combined return yards on Sunday games only: 16,957
Most rushing yards in a game by a player with 3 attempts or less: 105, on 2 attempts; 10/1/2000
Oldest player to have an 85+ yard run: 32 years, 44 days
Brian Mitchell hasn't even sniffed it, and he is number 2 all time, in combined all purpose yards behind only Jerry Rice (who played 6 or 7 more seasons.)
Don't even give me the argument he did it on special teams. the number of records he holds on special teams is insane.
Combined kickoff and punt return yards: 19,013
Combined kickoff and punt returns: 1,070
Kickoff return yards: 14,014
Kickoff returns: 607
Punt return yards: 4,999
Punt returns: 463
Fair catches: 231
Fair catches in a single season(2000): 33
All-purpose yards by any player against a single opponent: 3,076 against the Dallas Cowboys
Kickoff return yards in postseason: 875
Kickoff returns in postseason: 36
Punt return yards in postseason: 339
Punt returns in postseason: 34-tied with David Meggett
Combined return yards in postseason: 1,214
Combined returns in postseason: 70
Games with 100 all purpose yards: 118
Games with 200 all purpose yards: 15
All-purpose yards on Sunday games only: 20,818
All-purpose yards in a single decade (1990–1999): 16,905
Combined return yards on Sunday games only: 16,957
Most rushing yards in a game by a player with 3 attempts or less: 105, on 2 attempts; 10/1/2000
Oldest player to have an 85+ yard run: 32 years, 44 days
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Special teams and secondary are criminally ignored in the NFL HoF, it's totally true.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Max Scherzer
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
Yescutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
As of right now, he's an easy no. But he's got a hell of a peak under his belt and at this point probably just needs to do some compiling for a bunch of years.cutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37328
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Will he be a Hall of Famer?
If he keeps this going for another 2 or 3 years beyond this season, he's got that 7 year peak that everyone likes in a HoFer. I think he's closer than you're giving him credit for.philpritchard wrote:As of right now, he's an easy no. But he's got a hell of a peak under his belt and at this point probably just needs to do some compiling for a bunch of years.cutuphalfdead wrote:Max Scherzer