Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Birds in Hell »

I don't hear this one as especially punk influenced, at least not exclusively. I get much more of late 70s/early 80s hard rock thing - particularly that blistering solo.* This simply has to be the famed Motörhead-esque song.

Whoever said "Lightning Bolt" sounds like a Dio album title is right...and isn't that fucking awesome? I love it. These guys are doing a lot to make me happy lately.

(* yes, I realise that music was a huge influence over what developed into 80s punk.)
sward
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 4:46 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by sward »

I still say..that with a title like Lightning Bolt, you are better off just putting the album out sans title and with the artwork, let the fandom call it what it will. That way calling it Lightning Bolt is our fault! ;-)
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Chris_H_2 »

theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Not only that, but if everything about this song remained unchanged, including the music, Eddie's voice, etc., and you were to hear this song for the first time and the band Pearl Jam never existed, people would think "meh."
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by gems and rhinestones »

theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Couldn't the same thing be said about any song though? If the singers you mentioned sang for instance, Stairway To Heaven instead of Plant....or if one of the guitar players from Nickleback were playing on it instead of Page...

Think about it.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Jorge »

gems and rhinestones wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Couldn't the same thing be said about any song though? If the singers you mentioned sang for instance, Stairway To Heaven instead of Plant....or if one of the guitar players from Nickleback were playing on it instead of Page...

Think about it.
I'm sorry, I don't follow.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4644
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Self »

theplatypus wrote:
gems and rhinestones wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Couldn't the same thing be said about any song though? If the singers you mentioned sang for instance, Stairway To Heaven instead of Plant....or if one of the guitar players from Nickleback were playing on it instead of Page...

Think about it.
I'm sorry, I don't follow.
Did you think about it, though?
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Not only that, but if everything about this song remained unchanged, including the music, Eddie's voice, etc., and you were to hear this song for the first time and the band Pearl Jam never existed, people would think "meh."
You could say that about a majority of songs on all of their albums.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by gems and rhinestones »

Self wrote:
theplatypus wrote:
gems and rhinestones wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Couldn't the same thing be said about any song though? If the singers you mentioned sang for instance, Stairway To Heaven instead of Plant....or if one of the guitar players from Nickleback were playing on it instead of Page...

Think about it.
I'm sorry, I don't follow.
Did you think about it, though?
:haha: I don't think I follow it myself.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15498
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Thejambi wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Not only that, but if everything about this song remained unchanged, including the music, Eddie's voice, etc., and you were to hear this song for the first time and the band Pearl Jam never existed, people would think "meh."
You could say that about a majority of songs on all of their albums.
That's true -- and that's a reflection of how mediocre a lot of them are and yet people think they're deserving of songs of the year.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by B »

No one's calling this the second coming ... it's just a solid song.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Rangi Guy
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9429
Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 7:20 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/MistorKitty
Location: 41.1716° S, 174.8248° E

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Rangi Guy »

This song is like the second coming!!!
"I really enjoy sandwiches but the other guys are so good at making sandwiches that I don't make them. Now I make sandwiches."
gems and rhinestones
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 628
Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by gems and rhinestones »

Ole was song of the year for 2011.


I predict Alford Pleas will take the gold for 2013.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by evenslow »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Not only that, but if everything about this song remained unchanged, including the music, Eddie's voice, etc., and you were to hear this song for the first time and the band Pearl Jam never existed, people would think "meh."
You could say that about a majority of songs on all of their albums.
That's true -- and that's a reflection of how mediocre a lot of them are and yet people think they're deserving of songs of the year.
Totally agreed. AND if you just left the song as is, but humans didn't have ears and alligators made music, people would scrawl something on their hand like Helen Keller and then the alligators would eat them.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Farmer John »

theplatypus wrote:
gems and rhinestones wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Couldn't the same thing be said about any song though? If the singers you mentioned sang for instance, Stairway To Heaven instead of Plant....or if one of the guitar players from Nickleback were playing on it instead of Page...

Think about it.
I'm sorry, I don't follow.
I think it just comes down to "I like to hear these guys play, and Eddie Vedder sing."
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Thejambi »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
theplatypus wrote:I know this is very cynical of me, but I can't help but think that some people are kind of forcing themselves to like this song. I think if you presented this same song with a different singer (say a Bob Mould or a Greg? Graffin) to a bunch of Pearl Jam fans, most of them would go "meh."
Not only that, but if everything about this song remained unchanged, including the music, Eddie's voice, etc., and you were to hear this song for the first time and the band Pearl Jam never existed, people would think "meh."
You could say that about a majority of songs on all of their albums.
That's true -- and that's a reflection of how mediocre a lot of them are and yet people think they're deserving of songs of the year.
Every song isn't meant to be a tour de force or a chart topper. Every song doesn't need to impact you the same way as another or carry the same weight.
Sometimes the relationship you have with a band and its catalog creates the appreciation for a song. In 98 DTE probably wouldn't have brought me in to PJ if I hadn't already been a fan and its one of my favorites.
Last edited by Thejambi on Fri July 12, 2013 12:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
broken iris
Future Drummer
Posts: 2868
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:24 pm
Location: Death Machine Inc's HQ

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by broken iris »

B wrote:No one's calling this the second coming ... it's just a solid song.
Yeah. This will be much better live than Got Some, Comatose, or Save You. But hardly worthy of the 1994-2000 catalog.
the sentinel remains vigilant
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1512
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Hatfield »

Rangi Guy wrote:This song is like the second coming!!!
That is top notch posting! :thumbsup:
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1512
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Hatfield »

broken iris wrote:
B wrote:No one's calling this the second coming ... it's just a solid song.
Yeah. This will be much better live than Got Some, Comatose, or Save You. But hardly worthy of the 1994-2000 catalog.
I can't see this being better than Save You live but we will see. I wish the lighter part of MYM were a little more interesting (think poor girl) or a little darker.
User avatar
kreng
AnalLog
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 10:53 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by kreng »

broken iris wrote:
B wrote:No one's calling this the second coming ... it's just a solid song.
Yeah. This will be much better live than Got Some, Comatose, or Save You. But hardly worthy of the 1994-2000 catalog.
Haha what The fuck. The song has been out for 6 hours. C'mon
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

broken iris wrote:
B wrote:No one's calling this the second coming ... it's just a solid song.
Yeah. This will be much better live than Got Some, Comatose, or Save You. But hardly worthy of the 1994-2000 catalog.
I really like comatose live, at least live in person, ed may not sound great on a boot, but it works really well live
Post Reply