Yeah, that's it.The Argonaut wrote:Ben Affleck meets woman, develops crush. She is lesbian. He converts her. He finds out she banged two dudes at once before he knew her and he can't handle this because he is a little baby. He dumps her and is in general an asshole to her. Somehow she still wants to be with him. He tries to get his asshole homophobic best friend who doesn't deserve to have friends to have a threesome with the girl, because somehow that will help him. Maybe this friend is gay? Why is his asshole friend's opinion so important to him? I don't know how it ends. It was one of the worst movies I've ever seen.
The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
-
Kaius
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Maybe a lot of people took Kevin Smith way too seriously from the beginning?
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Pacino's film, as Jorge pointed out, was a remake as well. I kine of like the idea of visiting a version of this story every few decades and updating/changing the protagonist to explore a different background and current events.Strat wrote:Ugh
Universal Pictures announced Friday that it will release a remake of Al Pacino’s classic crime tale “Scarface” on August 10, 2018, filling in a slot previously listed as “Untitled Universal Event Film.”
The studio has Joel and Ethan Coen attached to the project to polish the script, which had been previously worked on by “Boardwalk Empire” creator Terence Winter.
The plot will follow the basic framework of Pacino’s film, but will change it from a Cuban immigrant in Miami to a Mexican immigrant in Los Angeles. Antoine Fuqua was originally brought on to direct the film, but had to back out due to prior obligations. Universal has yet to announce a replacement.
Martin Bergman, who produced Pacino’s “Scarface,” is returning in the same role. Marc Shmuger, Scott Stuber and Dylan Clark are also on to produce the film.
I do wonder though, the original film had alcohol (prohibition era) as the "drug" he was peddling, and the Pacino remake had cocaine. Which drug will the modern update feature? Heroine? Meth?
I'm already interested. If it's true that Diego Luna is starring, then I'm all in.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I suppose. But I feel like every criticism I've read in this thread so far (excepting his thin-skinned-ness) are all contained in Clerks. What he did with such a low budget might be impressive from a production and/or financial standpoint. But it's not impressive in terms of the art produced. Who cares how little he spent if the art is lacking.tragabigzanda wrote:I think the praise for Clerks was warranted. He made the thing for $37K and managed to conceive of a film that worked really well within that budget. Credit where it's due is all I'm trying to say.durdencommatyler wrote:Maybe a lot of people took Kevin Smith way too seriously from the beginning?
When the best thing a critic can say about your movie is "hey, he only spent $X!" I'm not sure that's an achievement.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40693
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Saag paneer
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
mmmmmmmmmwease wrote:Saag paneer
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I remember watching them play that live on...the Grammys? Some stupid awards show. I'm not sure it was bleeped, but then 20+ years later who can be sure of anything in your memory.The Argonaut wrote:you stupid dumbshit goddamn motherfucker!
The Billboards, that's what it was. Little Googling never hurt anyone.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43431
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
OMG The Bad Batch seems fucking amazing.
Is Keanu Reeves the only star that matters?
Is Keanu Reeves the only star that matters?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 11:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43431
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Gimme that my man, and im happy.tragabigzanda wrote:Just watched a trailer, really not feeling it. Seems like the sort of hyper-stylized gritty story the seems to come out every couple of months now.VinylGuy wrote:OMG The Bad Batch seems fucking amazing.
Is Keanu Reeves the only star that matters?
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
It's because the shooting script was too fucking long. The original cut of the movie is like 3 hours (including a truly awful musical number), so a lot had to be chopped-up and ADR'd.tragabigzanda wrote:The combination of the super verbose dialogue with the awful ADR and audio mix makes Dogma virtually unwatchable.wease wrote:Excellent way of putting it.BurtReynolds wrote:The further along his career got, the higher the production values, which kinda magnified his amateur problems. The mistakes in Clerks or Mallrats added to the charm. In later movies, not so much.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I've still go my fingers crossed for that 3 hour director's cut, though.theplatypus wrote:It's because the shooting script was too fucking long. The original cut of the movie is like 3 hours (including a truly awful musical number), so a lot had to be chopped-up and ADR'd.tragabigzanda wrote:The combination of the super verbose dialogue with the awful ADR and audio mix makes Dogma virtually unwatchable.wease wrote:Excellent way of putting it.BurtReynolds wrote:The further along his career got, the higher the production values, which kinda magnified his amateur problems. The mistakes in Clerks or Mallrats added to the charm. In later movies, not so much.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
All the deleted scenes are available on the special edition DVD... I got it for my 15th birthday
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Can I have it?theplatypus wrote:All the deleted scenes are available on the special edition DVD... I got it for my 15th birthday
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I lent it to my friend Jose Lopesierra and he never returned it
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85158
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
What a dick.theplatypus wrote:I lent it to my friend Jose Lopesierra and he never returned it