theplatypus wrote:But you're talking about stuff from the comics, not stuff from other movies.
all the comic movies (not origin stories) to date take bits and pieces of stories that have been well received by the comics counterpart
civil war
winter soldier
age of ultron
x2
x3
first class
DoFP
AoA
for the most part they have to be changed and be vague about something simply due to the fact that they dont have the rights to the characters needed to fully flesh out the story or the fact that a movie is 2-2.5 hours long and comic arcs can be made up of a few years of stories. so some movies have to gloss over some things that some people may just accept or others can say, oh, thats because in the comics so and so did such and such. you dont need to know EXACTLY what happened, just that something did happen
but its vague because of the comics (what part of the story is taken from). fox doesnt have the rights to include the back story, that the reason logan drove across the country was to help clint, which would pay him money, to get the hulks off his ass. instead of showing that the heroes finally got their shit together and attacked the heroes to and took over the world, they made a vague reference to the xmen passing (stop being whatever). you dont need to know the specific reason for the story to move on. they left it vague (IMO) as i said so as to not sully your perception of either charles or logan.
its explained that the antagonist for the most part is behind the lack of mutants and has set up trying to create new mutants as weapons.
yes, some of it is vague but by no means did it hurt or mute the tone of the story