Have you changed your opinion since March, Spike?Spike wrote:EllisEamos wrote:ridley, woodhead, and vereen are just fine in my book.Coach wrote: Pats don't need a running game.
New England Patriots
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35445
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: New England Patriots
digging up an RM2 post; this must've really been sticking in your craw.elliseamos wrote:Have you changed your opinion since March, Spike?Spike wrote:EllisEamos wrote:ridley, woodhead, and vereen are just fine in my book.Coach wrote: Pats don't need a running game.
-
wap
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 8:06 pm
Re: New England Patriots
wasn't that vereen's first playoff game? damn impressive
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: New England Patriots
I think it's now safe to say that Belichick's strategy to go with two tight ends, who are charged with blocking and running routes and making catches akin to a star wideout, is a bust.
The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.
However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.
Now, the Pats are stuck without their two best offensive weapons (Hernandez's high ankle sprain is still a huge problem - read Greg? Bedard of the Globe) for the second straight Super Bowl run.
They can still get there and win it, but they'll need a strong Plan B. Is it Vareen and Ridley? Perhaps so...
The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.
However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.
Now, the Pats are stuck without their two best offensive weapons (Hernandez's high ankle sprain is still a huge problem - read Greg? Bedard of the Globe) for the second straight Super Bowl run.
They can still get there and win it, but they'll need a strong Plan B. Is it Vareen and Ridley? Perhaps so...
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: New England Patriots
Wut?Coach wrote:I think it's now safe to say that Belichick's strategy to go with two tight ends, who are charged with blocking and running routes and making catches akin to a star wideout, is a bust.
The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.
However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: New England Patriots
Yeah, I don't get this at all either. Tony Gonzalez would also likely disagree.4/5 wrote:Wut?Coach wrote:I think it's now safe to say that Belichick's strategy to go with two tight ends, who are charged with blocking and running routes and making catches akin to a star wideout, is a bust.
The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.
However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
I... I just... I'm trying not to post in this forum until the Pat's season is over. Damn you, Coach.
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: New England Patriots
Not only does it work for the Pats, but several other teams as well. I'm gonna have to go with a big "disagree" on that.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
#1, i didn't know who had written it, i just remembered somebody posting it.spike wrote:digging up an RM2 post; this must've really been sticking in your craw.elliseamos wrote:Have you changed your opinion since March, Spike?Spike wrote:EllisEamos wrote:ridley, woodhead, and vereen are just fine in my book.Coach wrote: Pats don't need a running game.
#2, answer the question.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: New England Patriots
The point is the offense - at it's most dominant form - depends on two healthy ultra superstar tight ends, who are asked to do more than your average tight end (catch a 50 yard bomb, line up as a full back, etc.). The the odds of at least one of the two high flying TEs getting injured is too great given their risky behavior on the field....by risky, I mean physically demanding.Green Habit wrote:Yeah, I don't get this at all either. Tony Gonzalez would also likely disagree.4/5 wrote:Wut?Coach wrote:I think it's now safe to say that Belichick's strategy to go with two tight ends, who are charged with blocking and running routes and making catches akin to a star wideout, is a bust.
The strategy, when both all-world tight ends are healthy, is awesome.
However, Belichick failed to calculate the percentage increase in injury to his tight ends due to the overwhelming workload. It's asking too much - even of fine specimens in Gronk and Hernandez.
Check out last year's Super Bowl, where an unhealthy Gronk made the difference.
I'd argue that you will rarely see a healthy Gronk and Hernandez on the field together anytime soon. The high ankle sprain that Hernandez is playing on could set him back a whole season. I admire his guts out there, though.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New England Patriots
breaking news: people get hurt playing football
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: New England Patriots
and some players are injury prone more so than otherswarehouse wrote:breaking news: people get hurt playing football
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
so if i'm to read you right, coach, you'd prefer Belichick built his team around scrubs and avoided drafting superstars just so he wouldn't have to depend on them? ask San Diego how that's working out.
- rich
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:52 pm
Re: New England Patriots
Coach, you build your team the best you can with the best personnel available. Players get hurt, and the Patriots mentality has always been "next guy up." It sucks going forward without Gronk, but they've played a third of the season without him, and it's obvious that he probably should not have been out on the field to begin with. The way he was moving against Miami I had a feeling that this (season) wasn't going to end well for him.
The Patriots won't be able to use their entire playbook without him, but that's okay. It's a matter of putting together a game plan that is effective. I have no doubts that the Pats will be able to put up points against Baltimore, their defense is not nearly what people think it is. It's somewhere in the middle of the league, not elite.
The Patriots biggest issues will be limiting Flacco's deep throws up the sides. He's been very effective doing that. Of course Jim Caldwell is not the most creative playcaller in the world, so I like that advantage that NE has.
I think the point spread for this game is far too high, if I was betting I'd take the 9 points and be happy. I think the Patriots win, but I think it's going to be a very competitive game. Baltimore has no fear, which I love about them, and they'll come in and play well. I think the Patriots win, 31-27.
The Patriots won't be able to use their entire playbook without him, but that's okay. It's a matter of putting together a game plan that is effective. I have no doubts that the Pats will be able to put up points against Baltimore, their defense is not nearly what people think it is. It's somewhere in the middle of the league, not elite.
The Patriots biggest issues will be limiting Flacco's deep throws up the sides. He's been very effective doing that. Of course Jim Caldwell is not the most creative playcaller in the world, so I like that advantage that NE has.
I think the point spread for this game is far too high, if I was betting I'd take the 9 points and be happy. I think the Patriots win, but I think it's going to be a very competitive game. Baltimore has no fear, which I love about them, and they'll come in and play well. I think the Patriots win, 31-27.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
FYIBy Field Yates | ESPNBoston.com
Veteran official Bill Leavy will serve as the referee this Sunday for the AFC Championship, according to a reports from FootballZebras.com and from Jim Daopoulus.
Leavy has 18 years of experience as an NFL official, which includes work in a Super Bowl. He will be joined by a crew of top-rated officials from the regular season: umpire Chad Brown, head linesman Tony Veteri, line judge Jeff Seeman, side judge Doug Rosenbaum, field judge Scott Steenson, and back judge Perry Paganelli.
Leavy, a retired firefighter, has not previously worked a conference championship game, but has 14 games of postseason experience during his career. He was the referee for the Patriots' game against the Bills in Week 10 of this season, during which 21 penalties were called, including seven on the Patriots. He did not work a Ravens game this season.
During the regular season, Baltimore was the second-most penalized team in the NFL, with 121 called against them, including a league high 1,127 penalty yards. The Patriots were penalized just 97 times for 840 yards.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: New England Patriots
Pats fans, I feel for you. Baltimore really fucked shit up in the AFC this year, huh?
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
yup. congrats to them. still not sure why Belichick didn't sign Pollard when he had the chance. That guy has ruined 4 seasons for this team. 
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: New England Patriots
i could understand 1 or 2 of those, but 12? that seems forced.
- nah
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 6:14 pm
- Location: ypnbsbr
Re: New England Patriots
fucking talib