Every time that image shows up on FB or Twitter.Self wrote:Cooks without giving up Butler?
- Spoiler: show
2017 NFL Offseason
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I am much, much better at football than you.


- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Strat wrote:What am i supposed to think about the signing of Reiff and Remmers?
KNow nothing of them but they are our new tackles.
Reiff is a generic middle of the road tackle. Not terrible. Not good.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
In other words, a huge improvement on Matt Kalil.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Remmers, on the other hand...@SkitchP wrote:Reiff is a generic middle of the road tackle. Not terrible. Not good.Strat wrote:What am i supposed to think about the signing of Reiff and Remmers?
KNow nothing of them but they are our new tackles.

- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
- 4/5
- See you in another life, brother
- Posts: 6985
- Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
durdencommatyler wrote:Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
Coach wrote:I am much, much better at football than you.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle
-
MattA75
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Edelman and Amendola are both on the wrong side of 30 at this point, I believe Hogan is 29 going on 30, leaving Malcolm Mitchell as the only young receiver on the team. Gronk is consistently missing multiple games every year, and Dwayne Allen is not capable of duplicating what Bennett did this past year, nevermind Gronk.durdencommatyler wrote:Someone please explain to me how Cooks helps the Pats. A guy who is literally one of the worst receivers in coverage is going to help a team that has tons of WR depth, doesn't throw a deep ball, and just won a SB w/o him? Really? The Saints wanted to be rid of Cooks. And the Pats will dump him next year too before his rookie contract requires big money. Just seems totally stupid to me.
The Patriots also do off season workouts with the Saints just about every year, so Belichick already has seen plenty of Cooks and obviously thinks highly of him to give up what he did. I'm surprised by the cost but I doubt Belichick is going to give that up just for one year of a guy.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Do you really believe Brandin Cooks will be a Patriot next year? Meaning, the 2018 season?
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
- Orpheus
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2874
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:08 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I believe they can activate his 5th year option, so yes.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Didn't you guys also add a TE though?Coach wrote:It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
What the Patriots did this year is trade possible future talent for guys that can produce now. It's probably the best option with a 40 year old QB. Not only that, they took one of the best CB's from Buffalo without having to give up Butler to get Cooks...and added pass rush from Carolina, Kony Ealy is a pretty good player.
Cooks will do for you what Gabriel did for Atlanta last year and I'm not sure they are all that concerned about him being around for the long term.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Butler's visiting with the Saints on Thurs to work out a deal for a trade. But I agree, I most like the Kony Ealy signing. Sneaky good.Electromatic wrote:Didn't you guys also add a TE though?Coach wrote:It's a calculated risk the team can afford to take about not signing him long term. Brady tossed a few good long balls Hogan's way this past season, but Cooks takes it to the next level and I think he's like 23. Besides, our WC are old and Gronk will get hurt again. Losing Bennett in the passing game hurts too.
What the Patriots did this year is trade possible future talent for guys that can produce now. It's probably the best option with a 40 year old QB. Not only that, they took one of the best CB's from Buffalo without having to give up Butler to get Cooks...and added pass rush from Carolina, Kony Ealy is a pretty good player.
Cooks will do for you what Gabriel did for Atlanta last year and I'm not sure they are all that concerned about him being around for the long term.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35446
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks 
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Does he get unlimited sushi in his contract?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
McParadigm wrote:lol
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I thought they already had a decent O-line?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
#Feastmodespike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
Weighed in at 267 I'm told.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clapE.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already had a decent O-line?spike wrote:all 300 pounds of eddy lacy signs with the seahawks
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Wasn't their O-line terrible though? I can't get behind a joke that so clearly avoids the facts.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I was asking the question in the joke, I didn't know. So the joke standsSelf wrote:Wasn't their O-line terrible though? I can't get behind a joke that so clearly avoids the facts.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
