New England Patriots

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: New England Patriots

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Simple Torture »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: New England Patriots

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.
This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: New England Patriots

Post by doug rr »

go broncos
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

Doug
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: New England Patriots

Post by doug rr »

hey
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

I hope you enjoy the beers you get to have this weekend.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: New England Patriots

Post by doug rr »

Self wrote:I hope you enjoy the beers you get to have this weekend.
i'll probably have a couple...i've got 2 bottles of jameson packed in my golf bag as well. just found out we're invited to a pig roast on monday night
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

I haven't been to a pig roast in a long time.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: New England Patriots

Post by doug rr »

Self wrote:I haven't been to a pig roast in a long time.
come out on monday..I'll save you a cheek
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: New England Patriots

Post by numbers »

Self wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.
This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.
You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

numbers wrote:
Self wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.
This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.
You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.
That's what I said, Mick.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: New England Patriots

Post by numbers »

Self wrote:
numbers wrote:
Self wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.
This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.
You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.
That's what I said, Mick.
My bad, I didnt see your post.
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4647
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Self »

You have me foe'd, don't you?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: New England Patriots

Post by numbers »

Foeing is for weaklings, I'm just incompetent.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Coach »

Never foe. Censorship!
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: New England Patriots

Post by Green Habit »

doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: New England Patriots

Post by doug rr »

I wonder how many BRONCOS will show up next year
Post Reply