New England Patriots
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: New England Patriots
I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: New England Patriots
They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
McParadigm wrote:lol
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: New England Patriots
Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: New England Patriots
I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.numbers wrote:Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.Simple Torture wrote:I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.numbers wrote:Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: New England Patriots
go broncos
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
I hope you enjoy the beers you get to have this weekend.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: New England Patriots
i'll probably have a couple...i've got 2 bottles of jameson packed in my golf bag as well. just found out we're invited to a pig roast on monday nightSelf wrote:I hope you enjoy the beers you get to have this weekend.
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
I haven't been to a pig roast in a long time.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: New England Patriots
come out on monday..I'll save you a cheekSelf wrote:I haven't been to a pig roast in a long time.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: New England Patriots
You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.Self wrote:This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.Simple Torture wrote:I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.numbers wrote:Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
That's what I said, Mick.numbers wrote:You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.Self wrote:This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.Simple Torture wrote:I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.numbers wrote:Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: New England Patriots
My bad, I didnt see your post.Self wrote:That's what I said, Mick.numbers wrote:You do have to give up your own pick, but if he signs the tender the Pats can trade him for whatever they want.Self wrote:This is true and probably why Butler has at least some say. To make the deal happen, he probably has to sign his tender and work out a deal with NO.Simple Torture wrote:I'm like 99% sure that you have to give up your own draft pick when working through RFA deals, i.e. you can't use a pick you've received from another team to complete the transaction.numbers wrote:Yeah, Cooks had to be traded before Monday so NO wouldnt be responsible for his roster bonus, and Butler has still yet to sign his RFA tender and cant be traded. Word is the Pats and Saints agreed to the Cooks trade with the understanding that if they can work out a deal with Butler, the Pats will trade him to NO for their own 1st rounder that they just sent to NO, rather than NO having to give up their first rounder.Simple Torture wrote:They did. When that deal was done, though, there were sources that said the teams left a Butler trade open for discussion.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I thought they already got cooks without having to trade Butler?
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4647
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
Re: New England Patriots
You have me foe'd, don't you?
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: New England Patriots
Foeing is for weaklings, I'm just incompetent.
- Coach
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8333
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am
Re: New England Patriots
Never foe. Censorship!
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: New England Patriots
I wonder how many BRONCOS will show up next year