The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
But also maybe Mel Gibson, if that ever materializes!
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
It will restore a lot of my faith if Mel Gibson really comes on board for Suicide Squad 2. If they don't want Snyder running the universe (which will never stop being heartbreaking), they should put Gibson in charge.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I wonder if they can land Mel without full creative control. And I don't think DC/WB have any interest in giving any director full control.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
WB prides itself in being a filmmaker-driven studio. I am convinced they're still interested in giving directors full control to carry out their vision-- it's just that they're now picking safer directors whose visions aren't impenetrable/commercial suicide.durdencommatyler wrote:I wonder if they can land Mel without full creative control. And I don't think DC/WB have any interest in giving any director full control.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Everything that has happened with their DC films though says otherwise. WB might be a "director's studio" but so far their DC division has not been that way.theplatypus wrote:WB prides itself in being a filmmaker-driven studio. I am convinced they're still interested in giving directors full control to carry out their vision-- it's just that they're now picking safer directors whose visions aren't impenetrable/commercial suicide.durdencommatyler wrote:I wonder if they can land Mel without full creative control. And I don't think DC/WB have any interest in giving any director full control.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
What do you mean? From what I remember, the only thing that says otherwise so far is the Suicide Squad editing fiasco, and even then we have Ayer standing by the final cut.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
BvS is where it all started to go off the rails.theplatypus wrote:What do you mean? From what I remember, the only thing that says otherwise so far is the Suicide Squad editing fiasco, and even then we have Ayer standing by the final cut.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
I'm not in the room where it happens, obviously. But everything I'm hearing/reading/seeing from the pundits and the people who are "on the inside" paints a different picture about Ayer. Of course, he "stands by the cut" publicly. He knows where his bread is buttered. But we also know that the firm that cut the trailer for the film ended up doing the majority of the theatrical cut of SS. What that thing became is light years away from what we were shown early on and what we expected during production. Let's not forget the reshoot drama.
Then there's Ben Affleck. And The Batman. And the absurd number of directors that have pulled out of other DC projects. Shit, even Matt Reeves had a lough shouting fight with DC at his initial interview for the job. He walked away at one point. Maybe they're walking that back now. But it's clear there wasn't a "grand plan" in place from the beginning. There weren't Phases like Marvel had.
There's even talk now about how they had to rewrite and reshoot elements of Justice League to "lighten the tone." Snyder may have had control of Mos and BvS but he's lost some moving forward. It's part of the reason he's talking about walking away from all of this after JL.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43431
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Whedon can be a fine choice if he does something different than Avengers. I like him....as for Ayer, he is doing the Harley Quinn movie so he is still on board with DC...Im not worried about those two movies at all.
I might be a little worried about The Batman though.
I might be a little worried about The Batman though.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36768
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Good point, I wasn't factoring in all the people who'd abandoned DC projects in the immediate aftermath of BvS. Though I guess I don't feel qualified to speculate on what happens behind closed doors.durdencommatyler wrote:BvS is where it all started to go off the rails.theplatypus wrote:What do you mean? From what I remember, the only thing that says otherwise so far is the Suicide Squad editing fiasco, and even then we have Ayer standing by the final cut.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
I'm not in the room where it happens, obviously. But everything I'm hearing/reading/seeing from the pundits and the people who are "on the inside" paints a different picture about Ayer. Of course, he "stands by the cut" publicly. He knows where his bread is buttered. But we also know that the firm that cut the trailer for the film ended up doing the majority of the theatrical cut of SS. What that thing became is light years away from what we were shown early on and what we expected during production. Let's not forget the reshoot drama.
Then there's Ben Affleck. And The Batman. And the absurd number of directors that have pulled out of other DC projects. Shit, even Matt Reeves had a lough shouting fight with DC at his initial interview for the job. He walked away at one point. Maybe they're walking that back now. But it's clear there wasn't a "grand plan" in place from the beginning. There weren't Phases like Marvel had.
There's even talk now about how they had to rewrite and reshoot elements of Justice League to "lighten the tone." Snyder may have had control of Mos and BvS but he's lost some moving forward. It's part of the reason he's talking about walking away from all of this after JL.
It's amazing, the effect that BvS's critical and audience reception had. Even recognizing the film's problems, it's still puzzling to me.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I still haven't seen the film, but yeah. I totally agree with you. It's bonkers.theplatypus wrote:Good point, I wasn't factoring in all the people who'd abandoned DC projects in the immediate aftermath of BvS. Though I guess I don't feel qualified to speculate on what happens behind closed doors.durdencommatyler wrote:BvS is where it all started to go off the rails.theplatypus wrote:What do you mean? From what I remember, the only thing that says otherwise so far is the Suicide Squad editing fiasco, and even then we have Ayer standing by the final cut.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
I'm not in the room where it happens, obviously. But everything I'm hearing/reading/seeing from the pundits and the people who are "on the inside" paints a different picture about Ayer. Of course, he "stands by the cut" publicly. He knows where his bread is buttered. But we also know that the firm that cut the trailer for the film ended up doing the majority of the theatrical cut of SS. What that thing became is light years away from what we were shown early on and what we expected during production. Let's not forget the reshoot drama.
Then there's Ben Affleck. And The Batman. And the absurd number of directors that have pulled out of other DC projects. Shit, even Matt Reeves had a lough shouting fight with DC at his initial interview for the job. He walked away at one point. Maybe they're walking that back now. But it's clear there wasn't a "grand plan" in place from the beginning. There weren't Phases like Marvel had.
There's even talk now about how they had to rewrite and reshoot elements of Justice League to "lighten the tone." Snyder may have had control of Mos and BvS but he's lost some moving forward. It's part of the reason he's talking about walking away from all of this after JL.
It's amazing, the effect that BvS's critical and audience reception had. Even recognizing the film's problems, it's still puzzling to me.
And I'm with you on the speculation, too. I'm just relying on things I've heard from people who work in the industry. Which is still speculation to a degree so, yeah, I should pull back a bit on that. Because I really don't know anything first hand.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Because he wants to work again.theplatypus wrote:What do you mean? From what I remember, the only thing that says otherwise so far is the Suicide Squad editing fiasco, and even then we have Ayer standing by the final cut.
MOS & BvS are 100% Snyder.
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21690
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Paul Thomas Anderson's new movie is coming out on Christmas day: http://www.avclub.com/article/paul-thom ... ist-252969
McParadigm wrote:lol
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Affleck can't stay out of rehab I'm not sure we can blame WB for everything going on with The Batman.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12537
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
While he’s not a part of “The Predator” and his “The Legend of Conan” seems to have stalled, Arnold Schwarzenegger has revealed that the “Twins” sequel “Triplets” may start shooting by year’s end.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
80's action stars are pretty universally handling old age with humble aplomb.bada wrote:While he’s not a part of “The Predator” and his “The Legend of Conan” seems to have stalled, Arnold Schwarzenegger has revealed that the “Twins” sequel “Triplets” may start shooting by year’s end.
(patriotic choking noises)
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Oh hell yeah. In!