That could be, yeah. Part of the reason DSOTM flies by for me, though, is how connected it is. Each side is like one long song with multiple movements. And I really love that kind of stuff. I'm also really big into Thick as a Brick and Passion Play by Jethro Tull for the same reasons. So, yeah, I think you're on to something.tragabigzanda wrote:HAHAHA! I had no idea. Something about that album makes it more easily digestible for me, though. It might be that the running time is more song-oriented, and has less of the experimental/collage aspects of DSOTM?durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:Yea, for me it's probably a combination of fatigue and running length. Dark Side is a masterpiece...but I find it to be a bit long and cumbersome, whereas WYWH can slide into an afternoon listening sesh real easy...durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:Silly Joey, everyone knows Wish You Were Here is the best Floyd album.![]()
That's definitely been my experience with Pink Floyd fans. And with music fans in general as I've gotten older. I love Wish You Were Here. It's a great album and I can't fault anyone for putting it in the top slot. But sometimes it really feels like people do that because Dark Side is too obvious or too ubiquitous. Certainly fatigue plays some small part, right?
Either way, both outstanding records. But Dark Side is my favorite.![]()
Wish You Were Here is the longer of the two, though.
The other barrier to WYWH for me is what I discussed earlier about lack of vocals. Fucking Shine On... takes ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND YEARS TO GET STARTED. It drives me nuts. It's one of my favorite Pink Floyd songs now. But I still hate how long it takes for that thing to really get going and do anything.