The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52027
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Add it to the list.LoathedVermin72 wrote:I've not
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I just remember a conversation about the movie I had once and the overall consensus was that no one liked the movie and you're a bad person if you did. Fuck, it was brilliant. I mean, at one point Monica Belluci - who is a lactating prostitute - has to breast feed the baby Clive Owen is protecting. And he eats carrots as shooting power-ups. It's so balls to the wall insane.durdencommatyler wrote:It's favorably remembered overall, right? I never saw it. But I feel like a lot of people really like it.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I liked Shoot 'Em Upbune wrote:This feels like a trap to get me to say I liked Shoot 'Em Up.BurtReynolds wrote:if you liked Shoot 'Em Up, you might like it.
And if you have a good sound system...God damn does it pump. Music, sound effects, everything is loud in this movie.
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
trag will be happy:
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Was there ever any doubt?
- LoathedVermin72
- The Master
- Posts: 33961
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
That's dumb.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Very cool.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
I mean, duh. How are you gonna make a movie about Mr. Glass without Sam Jackson?
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
tragabigzanda wrote:I agree this should have been obvious to me because of the title.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, duh. How are you gonna make a movie about Mr. Glass without Sam Jackson?
Nothing is obvious in today's Hollywood, friend.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
To be fair, the 2004 Hayden Christiansen vehicle Shattered Glass was not a direct sequel to Unbreakable also did not star Sam Jackson so...tragabigzanda wrote:To be fair, the 2004 Hayden Christiansen vehicle Shattered Glass was not a direct sequel to Unbreakable.durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:I agree this should have been obvious to me because of the title.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, duh. How are you gonna make a movie about Mr. Glass without Sam Jackson?![]()
Nothing is obvious in today's Hollywood, friend.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Tell me about it. Lucky those fuckers didn't get sued.tragabigzanda wrote:To be fair, the 2004 Hayden Christiansen vehicle Shattered Glass was not a direct sequel to Unbreakable.durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:I agree this should have been obvious to me because of the title.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, duh. How are you gonna make a movie about Mr. Glass without Sam Jackson?![]()
Nothing is obvious in today's Hollywood, friend.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85160
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Well, I'm nothing if not highly presumptuous!tragabigzanda wrote:Right?! To just assume that this Glass film would feature Jackson seems highly presumptuous given Hollywood's track record...bune wrote:To be fair, the 2004 Hayden Christiansen vehicle Shattered Glass was not a direct sequel to Unbreakable also did not star Sam Jackson so...tragabigzanda wrote:To be fair, the 2004 Hayden Christiansen vehicle Shattered Glass was not a direct sequel to Unbreakable.durdencommatyler wrote:tragabigzanda wrote:I agree this should have been obvious to me because of the title.durdencommatyler wrote:I mean, duh. How are you gonna make a movie about Mr. Glass without Sam Jackson?![]()
Nothing is obvious in today's Hollywood, friend.

- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Cinematic Motion Picture News Thread
Steve Albini wrote:Whenever there's active promotion on the part of somebody else, whenever I see somebody all dolled up for a fancy photograph and someone's handing out flyers or whenever there's active promotion for something like that, as an imposition on my day, I hate all those people and I want them to fail. I have a visceral reaction to advertising and promotion. There's just something about salesmanship that grates on me on a very base level and I react very negatively towards it. I want those people to suffer and I want their enterprises to fail.
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Sun January 11, 2026 10:05 am, edited 1 time in total.