2017 NFL Offseason

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:ESPN is reporting that the opening Thursday night game is going to be Chiefs @ Patriots. I thought for sure it'd be the ATL @ NWE rematch, but they'll probably save that for a Sunday night later in the season.
Pats are 7 point favorites vs. the Chiefs. God help the Chiefs.
The last time the Chiefs played the Pats opening week, Bernard Pollard shattered Tom Brady's knee.

God help Tom Brady.
Ha, good point, but...
Pollard doesn't play for the Chiefs and he injured various Pats during different tenures at other teams. It's more about the Pollard effect on the Pats I think.
I fully expect the Chiefs to lose that opening game. I'm not kidding myself. But I think they're good enough to keep it under 7. But you never know. I've seen the Chiefs beat the Pats so badly that they sat Tom Brady. I've also seen the Pats rip the Chiefs to pieces. It's at Gillette, so I imagine the Pats take the win.

Especially with this new offense they seem to be developing that requires 97 running backs.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Lol
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Coach »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:ESPN is reporting that the opening Thursday night game is going to be Chiefs @ Patriots. I thought for sure it'd be the ATL @ NWE rematch, but they'll probably save that for a Sunday night later in the season.
Pats are 7 point favorites vs. the Chiefs. God help the Chiefs.
The last time the Chiefs played the Pats opening week, Bernard Pollard shattered Tom Brady's knee.

God help Tom Brady.
Ha, good point, but...
Pollard doesn't play for the Chiefs and he injured various Pats during different tenures at other teams. It's more about the Pollard effect on the Pats I think.
I fully expect the Chiefs to lose that opening game. I'm not kidding myself. But I think they're good enough to keep it under 7. But you never know. I've seen the Chiefs beat the Pats so badly that they sat Tom Brady. I've also seen the Pats rip the Chiefs to pieces. It's at Gillette, so I imagine the Pats take the win.

Especially with this new offense they seem to be developing that requires 97 running backs.
If it's at the Chiefs it's a different story; I think that's where the Pats last got whipped and Brady sat. Every year, don't NFL players rate Arrowhead as the most challenging place to play on the road?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Coach wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:ESPN is reporting that the opening Thursday night game is going to be Chiefs @ Patriots. I thought for sure it'd be the ATL @ NWE rematch, but they'll probably save that for a Sunday night later in the season.
Pats are 7 point favorites vs. the Chiefs. God help the Chiefs.
The last time the Chiefs played the Pats opening week, Bernard Pollard shattered Tom Brady's knee.

God help Tom Brady.
Ha, good point, but...
Pollard doesn't play for the Chiefs and he injured various Pats during different tenures at other teams. It's more about the Pollard effect on the Pats I think.
I fully expect the Chiefs to lose that opening game. I'm not kidding myself. But I think they're good enough to keep it under 7. But you never know. I've seen the Chiefs beat the Pats so badly that they sat Tom Brady. I've also seen the Pats rip the Chiefs to pieces. It's at Gillette, so I imagine the Pats take the win.

Especially with this new offense they seem to be developing that requires 97 running backs.
If it's at the Chiefs it's a different story; I think that's where the Pats last got whipped and Brady sat. Every year, don't NFL players rate Arrowhead as the most challenging place to play on the road?
It's up there, yeah. It's so loud. And this current team has shown a tendency to get UP for prime time games. I totally agree with you: if it was at Arrowhead we wouldn't be looking at a 7 point spread.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Green Habit »

Coach wrote:If it's at the Chiefs it's a different story; I think that's where the Pats last got whipped and Brady sat. Every year, don't NFL players rate Arrowhead as the most challenging place to play on the road?
I believed that was the game where Belichick repeated the "We're on to Cincinnati" line over and over...and then they pasted the Bengals as badly as the Chiefs pasted them.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by 96583UP »

I got Aaron Hernandez in my "keeper" league. I think this is going to be his year.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

AP to the Saints
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7305
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Peeps »

durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
maybe not that bad, now they may have to load up at the line creating more 1 on 1
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Kaius »

durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
But look at what happened last year with Hightower. Payton doesn't seem to like Ingram all that much and has actively taken opportunities away from the guy.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Kaius »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
But look at what happened last year with Hightower. Payton doesn't seem to like Ingram all that much and has actively taken opportunities away from the guy.
True. That situation was confusing. Ingram actually looked really good last year when he was given the carries. Fumbles are a RBs worst nightmare, I get that, but you still need your best players on the field. I can't see how AP is anything more than a good to very good, 5-10 touches a game backup. He didn't even look all that impressive before his last injury.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
But look at what happened last year with Hightower. Payton doesn't seem to like Ingram all that much and has actively taken opportunities away from the guy.
True. That situation was confusing. Ingram actually looked really good last year when he was given the carries. Fumbles are a RBs worst nightmare, I get that, but you still need your best players on the field. I can't see how AP is anything more than a good to very good, 5-10 touches a game backup. He didn't even look all that impressive before his last injury.
Very good point. I'm curious to see how they use AP. Will he be mostly a goal-line or 3rd down or change of pace guy? Or will they hope he has one great season left in the tank and give him the opportunities? I tend to see things the same as you but I gave up trying to predict/understand Sean Payton a long time ago.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Kaius »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
But look at what happened last year with Hightower. Payton doesn't seem to like Ingram all that much and has actively taken opportunities away from the guy.
True. That situation was confusing. Ingram actually looked really good last year when he was given the carries. Fumbles are a RBs worst nightmare, I get that, but you still need your best players on the field. I can't see how AP is anything more than a good to very good, 5-10 touches a game backup. He didn't even look all that impressive before his last injury.
Very good point. I'm curious to see how they use AP. Will he be mostly a goal-line or 3rd down or change of pace guy? Or will they hope he has one great season left in the tank and give him the opportunities? I tend to see things the same as you but I gave up trying to predict/understand Sean Payton a long time ago.
The only thing we know is that Brees will throw for another 5000 yards.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Kaius wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:AP to the Saints
Which kinda destroys Mark Ingram's Fantasy value. :|
I think it's too early to say this with any certainty. Ingram is younger, more explosive, more versatile, and simply better at this point.
But look at what happened last year with Hightower. Payton doesn't seem to like Ingram all that much and has actively taken opportunities away from the guy.
True. That situation was confusing. Ingram actually looked really good last year when he was given the carries. Fumbles are a RBs worst nightmare, I get that, but you still need your best players on the field. I can't see how AP is anything more than a good to very good, 5-10 touches a game backup. He didn't even look all that impressive before his last injury.
Very good point. I'm curious to see how they use AP. Will he be mostly a goal-line or 3rd down or change of pace guy? Or will they hope he has one great season left in the tank and give him the opportunities? I tend to see things the same as you but I gave up trying to predict/understand Sean Payton a long time ago.
The only thing we know is that Brees will throw for another 5000 yards.
:bammer:

Ol' reliable.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Electromatic »

Signing old running backs with histories of knee injuries and fumbling issues always works out so well.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Marshawn, this is Oakland. Oakland, this is Marshawn.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... chs-rights
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

durdencommatyler wrote:Marshawn, this is Oakland. Oakland, this is Marshawn.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... chs-rights
In his last game agains the Chiefs, he rushed for 124 yards.

Go Broncos
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84848
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Marshawn, this is Oakland. Oakland, this is Marshawn.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... chs-rights
In his last game agains the Chiefs, he rushed for 124 yards.

Go Broncos
I'm not looking forward to playing him three times, I'll tell you that right now.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

i love lynch...it's a position of need for the raiders as well
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
Post Reply