New songs at soundcheck

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Farmer John
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6459
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:25 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by Farmer John »

Walker Bait wrote:
warehouse wrote:
Strat wrote:
HardTI wrote:Can someone tell me around what time of the song they hear strings? I need to really focus and try to hear it.

i dont think there are actually any strings there. A couple folks are just saying "Oh, this spot, this is where i imagine strings would be"
*sax
I don't know, to me it sounds like strings but I could be wrong. At the end I hear stone and mike and another string as a middle layer between the two...
It sounds like Boom's keyboard strings.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
mastaflatch
AnalLog
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by mastaflatch »

true story: when i thought of a "dull" PJ song, the first one that came to mind was SoS but it's only because i really hate the arrangements on this one. the song itself isn't dull.
User avatar
HardTI
AnalLog
Posts: 1458
Joined: Fri February 22, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by HardTI »

harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
It would be a little bit of a cock tease to me though. Like the middle jam in Unemployable or the solo in Amongst the Waves. Man, Unemployable could have turned into something epic... (still might be my favorite track on the album)
You have to shave your nipples if you want to be with me.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
It would be a little bit of a cock tease to me though. Like the middle jam in Unemployable or the solo in Amongst the Waves. Man, Unemployable could have turned into something epic... (still might be my favorite track on the album)
I was never a huge fan of the 'jam band' aspect of their sound, really. I'm not bothered with solos I guess. I like them but yeah, not bothered.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
HardTI
AnalLog
Posts: 1458
Joined: Fri February 22, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by HardTI »

harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
It would be a little bit of a cock tease to me though. Like the middle jam in Unemployable or the solo in Amongst the Waves. Man, Unemployable could have turned into something epic... (still might be my favorite track on the album)
I was never a huge fan of the 'jam band' aspect of their sound, really. I'm not bothered with solos I guess. I like them but yeah, not bothered.
I see. It's interesting that the band has such a huge fanbase and enough songs that people like them for different reasons. I'm totally into the more jammy stuff. What would you say are a few of your favorite songs of theirs? I'm just curious to get an idea of your musical tastes.
You have to shave your nipples if you want to be with me.
User avatar
griffinxi
A Return To Form
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:46 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by griffinxi »

mastaflatch wrote:true story: when i thought of a "dull" PJ song, the first one that came to mind was SoS but it's only because i really hate the arrangements on this one. the song itself isn't dull.
I'm with you on this one. I remember when I heard the (acoustic?) demo for SoS, and I thought to myself, "Man, this sounds great." Then they gave it the full band treatment and it got about 800% worse. That arrangement sounds borderline inept to me.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
It would be a little bit of a cock tease to me though. Like the middle jam in Unemployable or the solo in Amongst the Waves. Man, Unemployable could have turned into something epic... (still might be my favorite track on the album)
I was never a huge fan of the 'jam band' aspect of their sound, really. I'm not bothered with solos I guess. I like them but yeah, not bothered.
I see. It's interesting that the band has such a huge fanbase and enough songs that people like them for different reasons. I'm totally into the more jammy stuff. What would you say are a few of your favorite songs of theirs? I'm just curious to get an idea of your musical tastes.
I don't think it's that I *prefer* their less jammy stuff. I just think a song is a good song, whether it's got a jam or not, and the inclusion of a jam doesn't lift it from being a good song to a great song for me. Other aspects do. A jam is actually going to be more likely to diminish a song's quality if I see it as unnecessary. So, for example, I took a long time to adjust to loooong jam sections in the middle of RVM. The best version of that song is the album version, where the jam is just long enough to keep the song from getting boring. An example of a jam that *does* work is the change to the fast pace on Present Tense's outro, on the album version. *That* kind of long jam at the end is the kind of thing they could extend live, and I'd be happy. Maybe the outro is a good place for a jam? I don't know. I just like a tightly structured song, I guess. There are always exceptions. Crazy Mary is totally enhanced by all of Boom's playing with his organ. (There's no way of writing that without it sounding funny.) Pearl Jam always had a big classic rock underpinning to their sound, and while I respect that, and I know that it's attracted probably a majority of fans, for me it was the 'alternative' and harder edge which attracted me to Pearl Jam. I like some classic rock fine, a bit of it a lot, but I was never a huge fan of the indulgent guitar solo like some. I never liked Guns 'n Roses and stuff like that. It's why Mike has always been a dispensable part of the band for me (sorry Mike!) but Stone was essential. In fact, it's nice to hear Stone riffing again on MYM, even if this riff is... not as good as they were.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
HardTI
AnalLog
Posts: 1458
Joined: Fri February 22, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by HardTI »

harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:
harmless wrote:
HardTI wrote:You guys know what would suck? If this song being soundchecked is really just like 3 minutes long and they are just practicing certain parts over and over.
If the parts are as nice as they sound, I guess I won't mind that.
It would be a little bit of a cock tease to me though. Like the middle jam in Unemployable or the solo in Amongst the Waves. Man, Unemployable could have turned into something epic... (still might be my favorite track on the album)
I was never a huge fan of the 'jam band' aspect of their sound, really. I'm not bothered with solos I guess. I like them but yeah, not bothered.
I see. It's interesting that the band has such a huge fanbase and enough songs that people like them for different reasons. I'm totally into the more jammy stuff. What would you say are a few of your favorite songs of theirs? I'm just curious to get an idea of your musical tastes.
I don't think it's that I *prefer* their less jammy stuff. I just think a song is a good song, whether it's got a jam or not, and the inclusion of a jam doesn't lift it from being a good song to a great song for me. Other aspects do. A jam is actually going to be more likely to diminish a song's quality if I see it as unnecessary. So, for example, I took a long time to adjust to loooong jam sections in the middle of RVM. The best version of that song is the album version, where the jam is just long enough to keep the song from getting boring. An example of a jam that *does* work is the change to the fast pace on Present Tense's outro, on the album version. *That* kind of long jam at the end is the kind of thing they could extend live, and I'd be happy. Maybe the outro is a good place for a jam? I don't know. I just like a tightly structured song, I guess. There are always exceptions. Crazy Mary is totally enhanced by all of Boom's playing with his organ. (There's no way of writing that without it sounding funny.) Pearl Jam always had a big classic rock underpinning to their sound, and while I respect that, and I know that it's attracted probably a majority of fans, for me it was the 'alternative' and harder edge which attracted me to Pearl Jam. I like some classic rock fine, a bit of it a lot, but I was never a huge fan of the indulgent guitar solo like some. I never liked Guns 'n Roses and stuff like that. It's why Mike has always been a dispensable part of the band for me (sorry Mike!) but Stone was essential. In fact, it's nice to hear Stone riffing again on MYM, even if this riff is... not as good as they were.
That's so well put. I totally agree. I really dislike the live RVM jams. Insignificance, to me, is a good example of that type of jam working in the middle of the song. I still think Unemployable could have benefited from a longer middle jam. Agree about Mike and Stone, but I like that Stone's riffs, these days, are more about finding interesting chord progressions and rhythms.

I feel like I don't need to post here any more cause we seem to mostly agree, and you're a bit more eloquent in your posts than I am. :)
You have to shave your nipples if you want to be with me.
RG64
Lost Cat
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 5:35 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by RG64 »

Pm please! Would like to hear.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by bodysnatcher »

For all new or lurking RMs who are looking for links to this song... If it's taken down, here's a synopsis of what it sounds like:

Very Zeppelin-ish, with hints of Soundgarden, and maybe some Pink Floyd (but not as much Pink Floyd as some people would like). It brings back memories of Garden, Sleight of Hand, Nothing As It Seems, and Gone. Strings may exist amongst the Stone and Jeff interplay. No discernible lyrics, but Ed sounds good. Sounds like a great song on a D-/F quality recording.
Revelator
AnalLog
Posts: 1931
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by Revelator »

bodysnatcher wrote:For all new or lurking RMs who are looking for links to this song... If it's taken down, here's a synopsis of what it sounds like:

Very Zeppelin-ish, with hints of Soundgarden, and maybe some Pink Floyd (but not as much Pink Floyd as some people would like). It brings back memories of Garden, Sleight of Hand, Nothing As It Seems, and Gone. Strings may exist amongst the Stone and Jeff interplay. No discernible lyrics, but Ed sounds good. Sounds like a great song on a D-/F quality recording.
Thanks for the description, bud! Haven't had a chance to hunt down a link yet but it definitely sounds interesting. MYM already has my hopes up big time for #10. :thumbsup:
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by bodysnatcher »

harmless wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
maybe Wendy Carlos is smarter than her twin
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

bodysnatcher wrote:
harmless wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
maybe Wendy Carlos is smarter than her twin
The baffling thing is that by Mike's 'better material than that', what she appears to mean is 'Inside Job'. Which... er... yeah.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

harmless wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
harmless wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
maybe Wendy Carlos is smarter than her twin
The baffling thing is that by Mike's 'better material than that', what she appears to mean is 'Inside Job'. Which... er... yeah.
But Inside Job isn't terrible, musically. It's the lyrics that ruin it for me.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by harmless »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
harmless wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
harmless wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
maybe Wendy Carlos is smarter than her twin
The baffling thing is that by Mike's 'better material than that', what she appears to mean is 'Inside Job'. Which... er... yeah.
But Inside Job isn't terrible, musically. It's the lyrics that ruin it for me.
I agree, but Wendy Carlos's Twin is referring to lyrics as well.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by bodysnatcher »

harmless wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:
harmless wrote:
bodysnatcher wrote:
harmless wrote:
Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:I feel about Speed Of Sound the same way I feel about Around The Bend and Thumbing My Way. They're nice enough songs but they're really pedestrian and plain and low-key and not all that interesting musically when it comes down to it. Eddie is the only band member who writes songs like this. Even Mike has written better material than that.
This stop is where I get off.
maybe Wendy Carlos is smarter than her twin
The baffling thing is that by Mike's 'better material than that', what she appears to mean is 'Inside Job'. Which... er... yeah.
But Inside Job isn't terrible, musically. It's the lyrics that ruin it for me.
I agree, but Wendy Carlos's Twin is referring to lyrics as well.
"Last Soldier" was pretty great

:roll:
rickson
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu April 18, 2013 2:03 am

Re: New songs at soundcheck

Post by rickson »

Guys

Anyone can PM and help me to get this?

Thanks!!!
Post Reply