Twin Peaks [2017]

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:Was Wally's paternal parentage a cliffhanger? I forget what was going on with Lucy and Andy at the time of the finale.
My memory is, no. I remember that we knew the kid was Andy's.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by wease »

durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
:thumbsup:

I'm gonna try and find them online tomorrow.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by wease »

We started Silicon Valley last night. Mrs Wease likes it A LOT better than TP.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

wease wrote:We started Silicon Valley last night. Mrs Wease likes it A LOT better than TP.
:lol:

SHE'S WRONG
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28035
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by Monkey_Driven »

durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
Don't start. You should play those PS4 games I listed instead.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
Don't start. You should play those PS4 games I listed instead.
Wait, which games?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
Don't start. You should play those PS4 games I listed instead.
Wait, which games?
Never mind. I found it!
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
Same. Though I have been dying to see how the town and the characters have evolved and moved on since the events of the Laura Palmer case. A few of these have already been hinted at (RR does to-go orders now, Shelly has a kid, Bobby is a deputy, The Roadhouse is possibly under new ownership but definitely has a new name. Jacques still tends bar there...) I'm as excited about watching happenings around town again as I am to unpack all the symbols and themes and emotions.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
Same. Though I have been dying to see how the town and the characters have evolved and moved on since the events of the Laura Palmer case. A few of these have already been hinted at (RR does to-go orders now, Shelly has a kid, Bobby is a deputy, The Roadhouse is possibly under new ownership but definitely has a new name. Jacques still tends bar there...) I'm as excited about watching happenings around town again as I am to unpack all the symbols and themes and emotions.
Does the Roadhouse have a new name? And that's not Jacques. Jacques is fucking dead. That's Jean-Michel behind the bar now.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by wease »

durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
I'm actually liking it. Very much.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:I haven't ever watched Silicon Valley.
I'm actually liking it. Very much.
I've heard great things. Once I get HBO back, I'll give 'er a whirl.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
Same. Though I have been dying to see how the town and the characters have evolved and moved on since the events of the Laura Palmer case. A few of these have already been hinted at (RR does to-go orders now, Shelly has a kid, Bobby is a deputy, The Roadhouse is possibly under new ownership but definitely has a new name. Jacques still tends bar there...) I'm as excited about watching happenings around town again as I am to unpack all the symbols and themes and emotions.
Does the Roadhouse have a new name? And that's not Jacques. Jacques is fucking dead. That's Jean-Michel behind the bar now.
It's called Bang Bang Bar now.

And d'oh!
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:So, are any of the loose ends from the original finale attended to in this new season?
I mean, how the fuck are we supposed to know? Only 4 episodes have aired!
Because you're awesome and have seen said 4 episodes and I have not?
I was being playful.

S3 is more Lynch than Twin Peaks 1 & 2 so far. By which I mean that it's slow and methodical and horrifying and gorgeous and strange. The story picks up 25 years after the events of the Original Series. Some things have been addressed. Some things have not yet. Some things might not ever. We'll see. But I honestly don't really care. So far these episodes have been so brilliant and engaging and satisfying that I honestly don't care if they resolve anything.
Same. Though I have been dying to see how the town and the characters have evolved and moved on since the events of the Laura Palmer case. A few of these have already been hinted at (RR does to-go orders now, Shelly has a kid, Bobby is a deputy, The Roadhouse is possibly under new ownership but definitely has a new name. Jacques still tends bar there...) I'm as excited about watching happenings around town again as I am to unpack all the symbols and themes and emotions.
Does the Roadhouse have a new name? And that's not Jacques. Jacques is fucking dead. That's Jean-Michel behind the bar now.
It's called Bang Bang Bar now.

And d'oh!
Is it? How do we know that?
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

It looks the same from the outside to me, and the interior looks pretty much the same too. Plus my IRL experiences of how businesses in small towns work leads me believe that a name change is more likely than a new bar in town.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:It looks the same from the outside to me, and the interior looks pretty much the same too. Plus my IRL experiences of how businesses in small towns work leads me conclude that a name change is more likely than a new bar in town.
But is the name dropped in an episode? I don't understand why we think the name is different. Maybe I missed something in one of the episodes.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:It looks the same from the outside to me, and the interior looks pretty much the same too. Plus my IRL experiences of how businesses in small towns work leads me conclude that a name change is more likely than a new bar in town.
But is the name dropped in an episode? I don't understand why we think the name is different. Maybe I missed something in one of the episodes.
You haven't noticed this gorgeous neon right before each band performs the closing credits?
Spoiler: show
Image
Spoiler: show
Image
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

Well, yeah. But that's on the front of the Roadhouse in the original series, too. It's always been there.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

:shock:
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
Post Reply