2017 NFL Offseason

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
*huggles*
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
*huggles*
Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
*huggles*
Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?
he's not even better than toni kukoc
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
*huggles*
Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?
he's not even better than toni kukoc
ohsnap
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47947
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithington
Well, no.
yeah
Ok but no.
yep yep
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.
7 long years, my brother
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.
please calm down
:?
*huggles*
Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?
he's not even better than toni kukoc
ohsnap
big baller kukoc

go raiders
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Green Habit »

durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
Fair enough, his 2016 stat line is horrendous, though I thought he was dealing with injuries. But if Tyreek Hill (fuck him, by the way) gets hurt or has a sophomore slump, they could be real thin at that position.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Green Habit wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
Fair enough, his 2016 stat line is horrendous, though I thought he was dealing with injuries. But if Tyreek Hill (fuck him, by the way) gets hurt or has a sophomore slump, they could be real thin at that position.
There are a ton of Chiefs fans that are really okay with this move. I'm in the middle. I totally see the financial benefit. And I understand Maclin's limitations (his age, his injury/concussion history, and his QB). But I also lean a bit your way. We don't have any depth at the position. And only Hill can really stretch the field. This really feels like a move for next year more than this year. We'll see. Maybe they have their eye on a free agent WR? I have no idea. Ultimately, I get it and I think I'm fine with it. But it does make me worry a bit.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51786
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Good article on the hilarity and stupidity that is going on in Washington with Cousins. Basically, if they don't get a deal done by next month and he gets franchise money, they'll be paying out over two years (or three if this goes to next year) the same amount of money as a long term deal, but without the cap relief that comes with a contract.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2715 ... =editorial
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Self
Polluted
Posts: 4644
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
Location: PM me, I have everything.

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Self »

Image
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28032
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Monkey_Driven »

durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
I like it in theory for a more balanced schedule, but it would lead to fewer interesting marque games.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Green Habit »

durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
Way too long between facing each interconference foe.

I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by epilogue »

Green Habit wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
Way too long between facing each interconference foe.

I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
I'm a little confused. I wasn't saying the literal final game of the season would be the inter-conference game. Just that at one point your team would play an inter-conference opponent that finished in your team's same slot in their own conference. I think teams would still get 8 home games and 8 away games. I don't think much of the scheduling would need to change.
User avatar
Green Habit
Site Admin
Posts: 6946
Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm

Re: 2017 NFL Offseason

Post by Green Habit »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Green Habit wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
Way too long between facing each interconference foe.

I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
I'm a little confused. I wasn't saying the literal final game of the season would be the inter-conference game. Just that at one point your team would play an inter-conference opponent that finished in your team's same slot in their own conference. I think teams would still get 8 home games and 8 away games. I don't think much of the scheduling would need to change.
No, I mean that playing only one interconference foe per year if you're playing all 15 of your own conference teams in a round robin would result in a very long time between two teams from opposite conferences facing each other.
Post Reply