Twin Peaks [2017]

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

darth_vedder wrote:I like the show, just having trouble really getting into it. I'm curious about the new season so I think I'll stick with it for now.
How familiar are you with David Lynch's work?
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by darth_vedder »

Not very. What else should I check out?
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

Blue Velvet will give you a lot to chew on if you're watching Twin Peaks, for sure.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

darth_vedder wrote:Not very. What else should I check out?
For more of a context on what he does and his style and approach to film making, I'd say check out Mullholland Drive and Lost Highway. You'll get a great sense of his overarching themes, visuals, and use of sound/music. But for more context into Twin Peaks, definitely check out Blue Velvet. That sort of small town/dark underbelly is also explored in that film. And I think Blue Velvet (though not explicitly connected) clearly shares the same universe somehow. They are cousins of each other in many ways.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:Blue Velvet will give you a lot to chew on if you're watching Twin Peaks, for sure.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

This guy gets it.
User avatar
darth_vedder
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6467
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:52 pm

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by darth_vedder »

durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:Blue Velvet will give you a lot to chew on if you're watching Twin Peaks, for sure.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

This guy gets it.
Cool, I think I can watch it via Amazon Prime.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

darth_vedder wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
washing machine wrote:Blue Velvet will give you a lot to chew on if you're watching Twin Peaks, for sure.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

This guy gets it.
Cool, I think I can watch it via Amazon Prime.
Fun coincidental fact about Blue Velvet that has nothing to do with anything; MacLachlan's character shares a last name with the town I'm from, and the town the film is set in shares a name with the next town over from my hometown. I've always felt a weird connection with that movie for those two reasons.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

Not trying to get deep into theories or anything, but I have a few observations anyway. Watched FWWM last night...
durdencommatyler wrote:Once again, I'm reminded that this really is a culmination of all his work.
Spoiler: show
More and more, I think that the Big Bang of this whole lodge mythology thing is in that Phillip Jeffries scene. Seems like every image, character and word happening there just expands and expands throughout the old series and the new one. If you take it chronologically within the greater story, it feels like an overture of sorts.

Just one example:
Spoiler: show
Image
Spoiler: show
Image
... and when thinking about The Man From Another Place exclaiming "electricity", I think about how this:
Spoiler: show
ties in with that humming mechanism with numbers on it that Cooper travels through after he exits the Black Lodge proper.

Again, I'm just vomiting observations at this point and seeing what sticks. We could do this with so many scenes across the series because, like we've all said, it all feels like a blurry culmination. That Jeffries business, though... Something to it.

When's the last time you watched Fire Walk With Me, Joey? I really forgot how enjoyable the Chet Desmond/Sam Stanley portion is on it's own. That diner scene is great.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by bodysnatcher »

this is up for preorder
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072MFNZ2W/re ... nzbRJZQF09

i'm guessing Ed will be on this?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

washing machine wrote:When's the last time you watched Fire Walk With Me, Joey? I really forgot how enjoyable the Chet Desmond/Sam Stanley portion is on it's own. That diner scene is great.
I saw a 35mm screening at BAM about four weeks ago. It was glorious.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by Simple Torture »

bodysnatcher wrote:this is up for preorder
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B072MFNZ2W/re ... nzbRJZQF09

i'm guessing Ed will be on this?
There's actually two different soundtracks, and I bet Ed's on this one: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0725SMR ... 1JblRxopCL
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by VinylGuy »

Ok, so i saw episodes 3 and 4.
Spoiler: show
He really pushed boundries with whats weird...there were a lot of scenes were i was thinking wtf is happening here and were is this thing going....i kinda forget how TP works...i think the first two were stronger....but then that finale with Lynch and Ferrer...thats pure magic.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

Holy. Jumpin'. George.

Is it future...or is it past, indeed.
Spoiler: show
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by wease »

washing machine wrote:Holy. Jumpin'. George.

Is it future...or is it past, indeed.
Spoiler: show
Wherethefuckdidthatcomefrom???
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by washing machine »

There's always music in the air, wease.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by VinylGuy »

Finished ep 5.
Spoiler: show
Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by Simple Torture »

VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
Spoiler: show
Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84852
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by epilogue »

Simple Torture wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
Spoiler: show
Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.
:lol:
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by VinylGuy »

Simple Torture wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
Spoiler: show
Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.
That was the explanation? I want to know how bob created him at least.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Post by Simple Torture »

VinylGuy wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
Spoiler: show
Im kinda tired with the dougie arc. Bring Coop back. I hope they explain how dougie exists in the first place...but for now, just bring Coop back.....
I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.
That was the explanation? I want to know how bob created him at least.
This ain't Lost, homie.
McParadigm wrote:lol
Post Reply