Yeah, the how isn't all that interesting to me. I'm much more interested in seeing how the "unexpected" results play out now that both Coopers are out. And that shit ain't supposed to happen.Simple Torture wrote:This ain't Lost, homie.VinylGuy wrote:That was the explanation? I want to know how bob created him at least.Simple Torture wrote:I think they basically did already: he was a decoy so that if Coop tried to come back, Bob wouldn't be pulled into the Black Lodge. Honestly: that's the most clearly explained plot point so far this season.VinylGuy wrote:Finished ep 5.
- Spoiler: show
Twin Peaks [2017]
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
-
parasolmonster
- I pee in the shower ... at the gym.
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Episode 6
- Spoiler: show
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
- Spoiler: show
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.E.H. Ruddock wrote:not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Come ONdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.E.H. Ruddock wrote:not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Come ONdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.E.H. Ruddock wrote:not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51788
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
IT COULD BE IMPORTANT PEARL JAMdurdencommatyler wrote:Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Come ONdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.E.H. Ruddock wrote:not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
OR IT COULD BE A GIANT FUCKING SNAKE EATING A PERSONE.H. Ruddock wrote:IT COULD BE IMPORTANT PEARL JAMdurdencommatyler wrote:Nope. You only tag me in posts with snakes. I'm not doing it.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Come ONdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh yeah, I'm not watching that.E.H. Ruddock wrote:not if you watch the video I provided you on Facebookdurdencommatyler wrote:I won't get to this until tonight. Man... Gonna be a long fucking day.
-
parasolmonster
- I pee in the shower ... at the gym.
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
I'm glad it wasn't just me. . .washing machine wrote:
- Spoiler: show
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
- Spoiler: show
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
-
parasolmonster
- I pee in the shower ... at the gym.
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
- washing machine
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15666
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
- Location: Space City
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Not sure I want to read that book, honestly. Just that spoiler alone has me conflicted.
It's a weird line a lot of us are toeing with this show from week to week now that we're actively watching it with other fans. On the one hand, discussion of characters and scenes inevitably leads to theorizing, but on the other hand I just want to live in the shadows of this mysterious world observing and feeling everything as it happens onscreen.
I'm interested in that scene I mentioned above more because how it's woven into the theme and mood of FWWM than I am in that character's extensive backstory, yet I still find myself drawn to knowing as much as I can about him and that place.
It's a weird line a lot of us are toeing with this show from week to week now that we're actively watching it with other fans. On the one hand, discussion of characters and scenes inevitably leads to theorizing, but on the other hand I just want to live in the shadows of this mysterious world observing and feeling everything as it happens onscreen.
I'm interested in that scene I mentioned above more because how it's woven into the theme and mood of FWWM than I am in that character's extensive backstory, yet I still find myself drawn to knowing as much as I can about him and that place.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
-
parasolmonster
- I pee in the shower ... at the gym.
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:24 am
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Truthfully, you don't get much from the book. It's mostly the history of the owl ring. It fits in pretty well with keeping the mystery of the show.washing machine wrote:Not sure I want to read that book, honestly. Just that spoiler alone has me conflicted.
It's a weird line a lot of us are toeing with this show from week to week now that we're actively watching it with other fans. On the one hand, discussion of characters and scenes inevitably leads to theorizing, but on the other hand I just want to live in the shadows of this mysterious world observing and feeling everything as it happens onscreen.
I'm interested in that scene I mentioned above more because how it's woven into the theme and mood of FWWM than I am in that character's extensive backstory, yet I still find myself drawn to knowing as much as I can about him and that place.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
Outstanding episode. Tense. Violent. Hilarious. Awful. Stuff is coming together in only the way it can on Twin Peaks. There is so much here to digest and discus and thunk about. I fucking LOVE this show.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16264
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Twin Peaks [2017]
She's been totally amazing.washing machine wrote:Also, I heart Naomi Watts in this.
- Spoiler: show