Using a picture that makes him look like every other college student in America is the most appropriate way to capture that question in a single photograph on the cover of the magazine. This isn't sensationalism for the sake of sensationalism.Boston Globe wrote:Make no mistake, this is a legitimate story for a magazine. While plenty of media coverage has rightly focused on the victims and survivors of the April 15th attack — and it wouldn’t have hurt Rolling Stone to acknowledge them on the cover as well — the question of what motivated Tsarnaev and how a seemingly mild-mannered teenager allegedly came to commit an act of unimaginable cruelty is worth probing. The article itself, reported and written by Rolling Stone contributing editor Janet Reitman, was released Wednesday and lays claim to be responsible journalism.
Bombs in Boston
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Bombs in Boston
I'd be more inclined to agree with you if it wasn't corresponding of a well written, journalistically sound article. I think using a humanizing picture of him on their cover illustrates the point the article is trying to make. Using a surveillance still of him placing the bombs wouldn't have done that.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Probably.given2trade wrote:But this is a dumb ploy to sell magazines.
Not if it works!given2trade wrote:It's just unnecessary.
- given2trade
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Jorge said:
That's what it comes down to. Can put him on there but the way they did it? Very poor taste.I think you're overlooking the larger impact of slapping this guy on the cover of Rolling Stone like a teen heartthrob
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
theplatypus wrote: And to labor the point, this.
Just in the couple seconds...
Don Draper. Television Character that is considered "cool" for his cruelty.
Casey Anthony- Likely murdered her daughter, and got famous for it. (wait, is that a photoshop?)
Lil wayne- numerous arrests, and hospitalizations for (likely) drug related seizures
Whitney Houston- Before dying of her addiction spent the better part of a decade as a total basket case
Amy Winehouse- major addiction problems that led to a young death.. same with Cobain. and Morrison. and Hendrix.
Snoop Dogg- was involved in a murder.
Survived significant addiction Problems.. Billy Joe armstrong, Robert Downey, Russell brand, eminem.
Rick Ross- Wrote a song advocating rape basically.
Rolling Stone, despite their "cool factor" have ALWAYS glorified questionable life choices, some with tragic results. And to a large degree, their cover had become irrelevant, and with one single act, they have attached a meaning to it again. If not for this article how many people on this music based message board could name a cover that was released in the last year?
I not only totally am okay with the cover, I think it was pretty brilliant in terms of marketing and more importantly in terms of starting a discussion. Most covers get you to maybe open up a magazine and read an article.. this one has you TALKING about it. It's forced people to examine what Rolling Stone is saying, and it seems like a pretty important point. This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Bombs in Boston
this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Agreed.@SkitchP wrote:I not only totally am okay with the cover, I think it was pretty brilliant in terms of marketing and more importantly in terms of starting a discussion.
The media glorifies questionable life choices for no other reason that it sells. It's interesting. People can't get enough bad news.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45827
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27320
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Bombs in Boston
nor do I unless I dont care is an optionBurtReynolds wrote:i don't have an opinion on this.
- given2trade
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
eh that's such bullshitcutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Bombs in Boston
Yeah. I think we disagree on a fundamental level here. No sense in prattling on about it.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
nyquillyn
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5825
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
cutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- Mecca
- slower than 82% of US
- Posts: 8516
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
I remember the water cooler discussion after he was identified was exactly that, though.given2trade wrote:eh that's such bullshitcutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- given2trade
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Was the water cooler trying to sell water coolers to teenage girls?Mecca wrote:I remember the water cooler discussion after he was identified was exactly that, though.given2trade wrote:eh that's such bullshitcutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Bombs in Boston
Rolling Stone may be pop culture but it's not Seventeen.given2trade wrote:Was the water cooler trying to sell water coolers to teenage girls?Mecca wrote:I remember the water cooler discussion after he was identified was exactly that, though.given2trade wrote:eh that's such bullshitcutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- given2trade
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1159
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 4:46 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
I agree but I can assure you that hundreds if not thousands of teenage girls who are "in love" with him rushed to buy the issue and put it on their wall.cutuphalfdead wrote:Rolling Stone may be pop culture but it's not Seventeen.given2trade wrote:Was the water cooler trying to sell water coolers to teenage girls?Mecca wrote:I remember the water cooler discussion after he was identified was exactly that, though.given2trade wrote:eh that's such bullshitcutuphalfdead wrote:this!@SkitchP wrote:This kid could be anyone, and that picture on the front not only reminds us of that, it makes the entire point with just one shot.
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Hmmm the kid looks like a younger G2T....put a white throw-rug of a dog with him on there and it could be him. Subconsciously I think this is why he is so against it....it reminds him of himself with out Luke. This raises his stress levels like we are seeing right now
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
Aside from the fact that I find that incredibly hard to believe, I don't really think it's anything to worry about.given2trade wrote:I agree but I can assure you that hundreds if not thousands of teenage girls who are "in love" with him rushed to buy the issue and put it on their wall.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Bombs in Boston
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Bombs in Boston
theplatypus wrote:http://www.buzzfeed.com/mbvd/state-trooper-who-released-boston-bomber-photos-relieved-of
I can't imagine he was surprised by that outcome.Sgt. Sean Murphy, a tactical photographer with the Mass. State Police, was relieved of his duty after releasing photos of the Dzhokhar Tsarnaev manhunt to Boston Magazine Thursday.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Bombs in Boston
Yeah no shit.