yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
2017 NFL Offseason
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
*huggles*durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:*huggles*durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
he's not even better than toni kukocdurdencommatyler wrote:Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:*huggles*durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
ohsnaplennytheweedwhacker wrote:he's not even better than toni kukocdurdencommatyler wrote:Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:*huggles*durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- lennytheweedwhacker
- The Master
- Posts: 47947
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
big baller kukocdurdencommatyler wrote:ohsnaplennytheweedwhacker wrote:he's not even better than toni kukocdurdencommatyler wrote:Hey, Lenny, if LeBron beats the Warriors this year, does that officially make him better than Jordan?lennytheweedwhacker wrote:*huggles*durdencommatyler wrote:lennytheweedwhacker wrote:please calm downdurdencommatyler wrote:Oh, I'm sorry. You said 7. I read that as 1. No, you're totally right. It's 7.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:7 long years, my brotherdurdencommatyler wrote:I mean, it's actually a fact. You can look it up. I'm not sure why you want to make this the hill you want to die on.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yep yepdurdencommatyler wrote:Ok but no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:yeahdurdencommatyler wrote:Well, no.lennytheweedwhacker wrote:didn't they go like 7 years without a td reception by a wr before he got there? methinks it's partially alex smithingtondurdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
go raiders
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Fair enough, his 2016 stat line is horrendous, though I thought he was dealing with injuries. But if Tyreek Hill (fuck him, by the way) gets hurt or has a sophomore slump, they could be real thin at that position.durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
There are a ton of Chiefs fans that are really okay with this move. I'm in the middle. I totally see the financial benefit. And I understand Maclin's limitations (his age, his injury/concussion history, and his QB). But I also lean a bit your way. We don't have any depth at the position. And only Hill can really stretch the field. This really feels like a move for next year more than this year. We'll see. Maybe they have their eye on a free agent WR? I have no idea. Ultimately, I get it and I think I'm fine with it. But it does make me worry a bit.Green Habit wrote:Fair enough, his 2016 stat line is horrendous, though I thought he was dealing with injuries. But if Tyreek Hill (fuck him, by the way) gets hurt or has a sophomore slump, they could be real thin at that position.durdencommatyler wrote:Look at Maclin's stats. Then weigh that against the 10 million in savings and then tell me if you would have done the same thing as KC GM.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51786
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Good article on the hilarity and stupidity that is going on in Washington with Cousins. Basically, if they don't get a deal done by next month and he gets franchise money, they'll be paying out over two years (or three if this goes to next year) the same amount of money as a long term deal, but without the cap relief that comes with a contract.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2715 ... =editorial
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2715 ... =editorial
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Self
- Polluted
- Posts: 4644
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:27 am
- Location: PM me, I have everything.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28032
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I like it in theory for a more balanced schedule, but it would lead to fewer interesting marque games.durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
Way too long between facing each interconference foe.durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84845
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
I'm a little confused. I wasn't saying the literal final game of the season would be the inter-conference game. Just that at one point your team would play an inter-conference opponent that finished in your team's same slot in their own conference. I think teams would still get 8 home games and 8 away games. I don't think much of the scheduling would need to change.Green Habit wrote:Way too long between facing each interconference foe.durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
- Green Habit
- Site Admin
- Posts: 6946
- Joined: Wed December 12, 2012 10:33 pm
Re: 2017 NFL Offseason
No, I mean that playing only one interconference foe per year if you're playing all 15 of your own conference teams in a round robin would result in a very long time between two teams from opposite conferences facing each other.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm a little confused. I wasn't saying the literal final game of the season would be the inter-conference game. Just that at one point your team would play an inter-conference opponent that finished in your team's same slot in their own conference. I think teams would still get 8 home games and 8 away games. I don't think much of the scheduling would need to change.Green Habit wrote:Way too long between facing each interconference foe.durdencommatyler wrote:Pros and Cons of getting rid of Divisions. Just two Conferences. Each team plays everyone else in their Conference and for their 16th game they play the opponent in the other Conference who finished closest to their position in the previous regular season. What do you think? Good idea, bad idea?
I'm fine with eliminating divisions as long as you keep the same scheduling in place, including home and home against current division foes.
