MLB
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
https://www.thescore.com/mlb/news/1323524
I was just talking about this game a few days ago. Ruths combined "no hitter" 100 years ago today
I was just talking about this game a few days ago. Ruths combined "no hitter" 100 years ago today
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22819
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: MLB
Everybody watch Jarrod Dyson scoring from 2nd on a wild pitch just now.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
(she/him/theirs)
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: MLB
Bammer wrote:Everybody watch Jarrod Dyson scoring from 2nd on a wild pitch just now.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
It was a totally legitimate bunt. Anyone else saying otherwise is a whiner.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
Some of those unwritten rules I've never understood. I've also never understood the "fielders indifference" on stolen bases late in games. There was one years ago, Cleveland vs Yankees. Cleveland let someone take 2nd (fielders indifference) then decided since first was open and it was I think A-rod up? they put the batter on, next batter gets a hit, runner from 2nd scores, next batter hits a homer and its a tied game.@SkitchP wrote:Bammer wrote:Everybody watch Jarrod Dyson scoring from 2nd on a wild pitch just now.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
It was a totally legitimate bunt. Anyone else saying otherwise is a whiner.
- @SkitchP
- RM Elitist
- Posts: 9995
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm
Re: MLB
Because they'd rather let that runner take second considering what, 30% of runners get thrown out. At that point you create a lot of opportunity for an error that could then put that runner on third, or possibly even score. It's the basic "dont throw the ball around" especially in a game with a decent size lead- that one run is very unlikely to matter. The problem in your example is the defensive indifference wasn't what allowed the runs- it was the walk, hit, home run.MadTIGERmaN wrote:Some of those unwritten rules I've never understood. I've also never understood the "fielders indifference" on stolen bases late in games. There was one years ago, Cleveland vs Yankees. Cleveland let someone take 2nd (fielders indifference) then decided since first was open and it was I think A-rod up? they put the batter on, next batter gets a hit, runner from 2nd scores, next batter hits a homer and its a tied game.@SkitchP wrote:Bammer wrote:Everybody watch Jarrod Dyson scoring from 2nd on a wild pitch just now.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
It was a totally legitimate bunt. Anyone else saying otherwise is a whiner.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
Fielders indifference comes from not holding the runner on at first, you're allowing him to get as big of a lead as he wants. It would make sense if it was a dead pull lefty up or a good hit and run hitter up and you wanted to play the first baseman off the bag to give yourself a better shot at an out, BUT, it was A-Rod. Just looking at his spray chart from 2012-2016, it looks like he hit maybe 7 balls on the ground to first. http://www.fangraphs.com/spraycharts.as ... LL&vs2=ALL@SkitchP wrote:Because they'd rather let that runner take second considering what, 30% of runners get thrown out. At that point you create a lot of opportunity for an error that could then put that runner on third, or possibly even score. It's the basic "dont throw the ball around" especially in a game with a decent size lead- that one run is very unlikely to matter. The problem in your example is the defensive indifference wasn't what allowed the runs- it was the walk, hit, home run.MadTIGERmaN wrote:Some of those unwritten rules I've never understood. I've also never understood the "fielders indifference" on stolen bases late in games. There was one years ago, Cleveland vs Yankees. Cleveland let someone take 2nd (fielders indifference) then decided since first was open and it was I think A-rod up? they put the batter on, next batter gets a hit, runner from 2nd scores, next batter hits a homer and its a tied game.@SkitchP wrote:Bammer wrote:Everybody watch Jarrod Dyson scoring from 2nd on a wild pitch just now.
He fast.
Oh and his bunt to break up a perfect game bid in the 6th this week was a great play and sparked a 7 run outburst so suck it, baseball purists.
It was a totally legitimate bunt. Anyone else saying otherwise is a whiner.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
Temporarily.PHATJ wrote:Twins sweep the Indians to reclaim first place in Central.
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: MLB
I find that this to be a lot better than "not at all'.philpritchard wrote:Temporarily.PHATJ wrote:Twins sweep the Indians to reclaim first place in Central.
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
Absolutely! Being in it for a few months is better than not being in it at all.PHATJ wrote:I find that this to be a lot better than "not at all'.philpritchard wrote:Temporarily.PHATJ wrote:Twins sweep the Indians to reclaim first place in Central.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
verb_to_trust wrote:Miguel Montero is an idiot.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: MLB
So glad Miggy got out of that weird ass cult of personality the Cubs organization has created for themselves.
Dick/Balls
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
It was really smart of him to blame his teammates for his own weaknesses, too. It's a really endearing quality.verb_to_trust wrote:So glad Miggy got out of that weird ass cult of personality the Cubs organization has created for themselves.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: MLB
He was pretty spot on though about Arrieta. That guy sucks but still thinks he Cy Young. Must be very frustrating to work with him. Miggy should have kept it to himself and he has a noodle arm, but what he said wasn't wrong per say.
Dick/Balls
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
About not holding runners? Arrieta may not be good at it, but it hasn't been an issue for Contreras.verb_to_trust wrote:He was pretty spot on though about Arrieta. That guy sucks but still thinks he Cy Young. Must be very frustrating to work with him. Miggy should have kept it to himself and he has a noodle arm, but what he said wasn't wrong per say.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: MLB
Does Contreras even catch Arrieta though? I don't actually watch baseball so I don't know.
Dick/Balls