I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.McParadigm wrote:"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know
I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
Vitalogy 2.0
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.evenslow wrote:I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.McParadigm wrote:"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know
I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?McParadigm wrote:Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.evenslow wrote:I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.McParadigm wrote:"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know
I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40177
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
Risks all the way. They should get all the tunes Matt wrote for the Soundgarden album and record them. (Assuming they weren't finished and SG doesn't plan on releasing it).Sgt. Crackpot wrote:So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?McParadigm wrote:Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.evenslow wrote:I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.McParadigm wrote:"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know
I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
100%evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
(patriotic choking noises)
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40177
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
Yes, indeedMcParadigm wrote:100%evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Superblood Wolfmoon
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1867
- Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
I think PJ has tried this formula on pretty much every album. It's just that the songs aren't as good.Lounge Lizard wrote:Angry punkish numbers; kickass riffs by Stone; hallucinogenic interludes and a completely nut-loose closer; a moody half ballad discussing the cost of endless life
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
- PHATJ
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
- Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
- Location: Gigatown
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
We've all said this a thousand times.wease wrote:Yes, indeedMcParadigm wrote:100%evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
- surfndestroy
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2870
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
What is a failed experiment at this point? I'd call the last two albums failed experiments.evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
For all the talk of Vitalogy being a risk, I don't see that. They put a sure fire hit on it in Betterman and they had to know Immortality was going to go over well. The musical songs are all pretty straight forward and a continuation of Vs, same for the lyrics. Then there's the filler. Is it risky putting filler on an album where you have to feel you have two big hits?
When I see people wanting a Vitalogy 2.0 is what they really want something more raw and less polished in the production? With one or two far fetched ideas included even though the average person will just skip them?
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36494
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
I like Vitalogy's musical songs
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.surfndestroy wrote:What is a failed experiment at this point?evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.evenslow wrote:It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.surfndestroy wrote:What is a failed experiment at this point?evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
- Sgt. Crackpot
- F.U.B.A.R
- Posts: 9104
- Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
- Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
- Location: Lft Craquepeau
- Contact:
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
Maybe they should make the next Tool album. That'd be a risk.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Vitalogy 2.0
AKA paint-by-numbers AKA the Lightning Bolt treatment.Strat wrote:That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.evenslow wrote:It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.surfndestroy wrote:What is a failed experiment at this point?evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM