Vitalogy 2.0

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by evenslow »

McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by McParadigm »

evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.
Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.
Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.
So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40178
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by wease »

Sgt. Crackpot wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
stip wrote:The Corduroy outro fades out already, you know :)


I certainly think pearl jam has a great album left in them. Vitalogy great, I doubt it. Eddie physically can't sing the way he used to even if everything was in place
"Great" is a quality comparison, though, not a sonic one. An album as great as Vitalogy made today wouldn't have to sound anything like that record, it would just be a matter of playing to their strengths now the same way they played to their strengths then.

There's no reason Ed couldn't find compelling ways to use what his instrument is now, rather than croak out low notes and fall flat on high ones. They'd just have to find a new sonic approach that serves whatever he replaces it with, and that takes commitment, risk, and confidence in your audience...three things I believe they lack entirely.
I would argue they took a little risk (h/t Warren Zevon) on Backspacer but Lightning Bolt is certainly about as risk-averse as it gets.
Agreed. It's hard to tell from the way they talked about it at the time whether or not they actually recognized what a risk that record was, though.
So it begs the question, do we want a safe record this time or do we want PJ to take some risks?
Risks all the way. They should get all the tunes Matt wrote for the Soundgarden album and record them. (Assuming they weren't finished and SG doesn't plan on releasing it).
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by evenslow »

I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by McParadigm »

evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
100%
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40178
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by wease »

McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
100%
Yes, indeed
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Superblood Wolfmoon
AnalLog
Posts: 1867
Joined: Thu November 21, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by Superblood Wolfmoon »

Lounge Lizard wrote:Angry punkish numbers; kickass riffs by Stone; hallucinogenic interludes and a completely nut-loose closer; a moody half ballad discussing the cost of endless life
I think PJ has tried this formula on pretty much every album. It's just that the songs aren't as good.
I'm trying real hard to be the shepherd.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by PHATJ »

wease wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
100%
Yes, indeed
We've all said this a thousand times. :gomez:
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by surfndestroy »

evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point? I'd call the last two albums failed experiments.

For all the talk of Vitalogy being a risk, I don't see that. They put a sure fire hit on it in Betterman and they had to know Immortality was going to go over well. The musical songs are all pretty straight forward and a continuation of Vs, same for the lyrics. Then there's the filler. Is it risky putting filler on an album where you have to feel you have two big hits?

When I see people wanting a Vitalogy 2.0 is what they really want something more raw and less polished in the production? With one or two far fetched ideas included even though the average person will just skip them?
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36494
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by Jorge »

I like Vitalogy's musical songs
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by evenslow »

surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?
It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by Strat »

evenslow wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?
It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

Maybe they should make the next Tool album. That'd be a risk.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Vitalogy 2.0

Post by evenslow »

Strat wrote:
evenslow wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
evenslow wrote:I'm much more into the idea of a failed experiment than another paint-by-numbers.
What is a failed experiment at this point?
It would be more akin to Binaural than Vitalogy probably. Just them stepping outside their mainstream-ish comfort zone to make space for the slightly artier material like "Nothing As It Seems" or "Sleight of Hand." Even something like "Of The Earth" I would be happy about b/c you can hear them trying for something bigger on it. A little ambition goes a long way.

Barring that, I think most people around here would just be happy with some production that doesn't sound like it was created in BOB's radio-rock lab.
That and i hope for the non 2-3 punk numbers 1 big anthem, 1-3 semi anthems, and 2 ed solo track thing.
AKA paint-by-numbers AKA the Lightning Bolt treatment.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
Post Reply