Solo: A Star Wars Story (5/25/2018)

May the force be with you
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

Everybody calm down.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36752
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by Jorge »

You calm down, geek sheep!
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

Grrrrr!
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by Strat »

This argument appears to come down to whether or not you are in the star wars camp, or feel its a PRAMG.

Team Lucasfilm. These bums had no business making a Han Solo movie.

FTR: I dont want a Han Solo movie.

Alas....
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by @SkitchP »

I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.

More Star Wars More Better.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.

Oh and fucking funko toys.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by Strat »

@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.

More Star Wars More Better.
I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.

But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by @SkitchP »

Strat wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.

More Star Wars More Better.
I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.

But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.

Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures of Han Solo" type thing.
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

@SkitchP wrote:
Strat wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.

More Star Wars More Better.
I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.

But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.

Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures of Han SoloAce Ventura" type thing.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.

Oh and fucking funko toys.
You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.

I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.

If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

@SkitchP wrote:
Strat wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:I want a Han Solo Movie. I want a Boba Fett movie. I want a Pong Krell Movie and a Chopper Movie. I want them to make a star wars movie for all of everything and I want to watch all of them.

More Star Wars More Better.
I want all of those except Han. I dont need to know his backstory. He's cool AF regardless.

But, yes, more star wars. I hope this movie turns out great because I need more Star Wars to put on at the end of the day.

Honestly, I hope this movie ISNT a backstory as much as a "Wacky Adventures of Han Solo" type thing.
Agreed. I'm done with less backstory/exposition and more adventuring.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by Strat »

durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.

Oh and fucking funko toys.
You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.

I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.

If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35416
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by Strat »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
:haha:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:Screenwriters are worthless dogshit, accept it
BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.

Oh and fucking funko toys.
You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.

I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.

If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.
Exactly.

If no bridges were actually burned on either side, I'd love to see Lord and Miller come back some day and tell their version of a Star Wars story that involves new characters, characters they get to help create and design and takes place in a time/place/land that's fresh and calling for exploration.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by VinylGuy »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Strat wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:I agree with LV...They were making their movie, they were working to have whatever they wanted to...I saw Rogue One again and the reshoots en reediting of that mess is so fuckin noticeable i dont understand why they hire directors if they dont care about their artistic input...all they want is to play safe specially because audiences are so fucking numb all they want is a copy of a copy. Thats it.

Oh and fucking funko toys.
You and (especially) LV have a director's bias. And there's nothing wrong with that. I can totally understand why you're taking the position you're taking here. I have a writer's bias, admittedly. So, of course, I'm going to side more with Disney here. Because as much as I want a director to have a vision and to be able to exercise their creativity on a project, I also believe that film is collaborative. And the writer's work is important, too. Especially on a project like this. These are established characters in some established worlds. It's far more important to be true to the characters here. To listen to them and let them dictate. To me, that's far more important than whatever wack-a-do concept Lord and Miller may have had. They agreed to join a project that already has established mythology and tradition. I'm fine with expanding that mythology and changing the rules of that tradition but it can't be done in a vacuum.

I'd be on L&M's side if this was their own original concept. In that case, absolutely! Let them have complete control. Let them piss their vision all over everything and everyone; mark their territory and demand obedience. This is different.

If Lord and Miller want to make a gonzo slapstick space comedy, then good on them. They should go make that movie. And if/when they do, they should have complete creative control and freedom.
Im all for them to make a star wars movie about a new character or new world within Star Wars. But yes, rearranging a character to fit their mold (which i have a feeling is a very one dimensional approach to story telling) then i say GTFO.
Exactly.

If no bridges were actually burned on either side, I'd love to see Lord and Miller come back some day and tell their version of a Star Wars story that involves new characters, characters they get to help create and design and takes place in a time/place/land that's fresh and calling for exploration.
Joey, you realize that ¨fresh and exploration¨ is not something that ´ll happen with a brand like SW right? They had that opportunity with Rogue One and they did re shoots and redited the movie because the tone was too dark or something. They even put R2 there.
I guess the worst part of this is the overall feeling i have that this is a waste of time. The movie, the fans, the trailers..is just a waste of time. There will be nothing new here, its just a big fan service...and when it feels there could be a new angle, its taken down...All i really care about SW is episode 8.

I was against a Solo origin movie anyway.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

Okay, well, you clearly know more about it than us geek sheep.

And, yeah, I'm way more excited about The Last Jedi than I am about Han Solo. That hasn't changed.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33961
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

For the record, I absolutely love Rogue One. It's a miracle that movie happened.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85142
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Wars: Han Solo (5/25/2018)

Post by epilogue »

LoathedVermin72 wrote:For the record, I absolutely love Rogue One. It's a miracle that movie happened.
Nope. It wasn't fresh or interesting it all. It was edited and reshot to be just like every other Star Wars movie. It offered nothing new. It was a pointless film with no redeeming value. They even put R2 there!
Post Reply