HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

joey, you don't actually believe that good soldiers make good kings?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:Where she ends up in aDwD is amazing. But we didn't need an entire book of sitting around and being a suddenly indecisive, cock-whipped, little baby girl with now will or power to get us there. GRRM spun his wheels WAY too much in that book. He took away everything Dany had earned and turned her into a dipshit, lovelorn, idiot with no leadership ability whatsoever. He completely retconned her. It was easily the most frustrating aspect of the entire series so far.

Maybe reading the fan-approved super edit of Books 4 & 5 somehow helps that feel less like a betrayal. I can't speak to that. But the fact remains that he didn't publish his story that way. As it stands, as the author's intent, the book robs Dany of her personality and power and agency until the final two or three chapters. It's completely shitty.

The show forgoes all of that nonsense and streamlines it. The show handles Dany way better. It's one of the few things the show absolutely fixes from the novels.
to be fair, Dany is a very young girl in the books and a young woman in the show
Yeah, but if that's your argument, how do you explain how fucking clearly badass and advanced she is as early as book 2? That's what bothers me about Book 5, the digression. The devolution. She'd already advanced to a certain, specific point. And just because GRRM couldn't figure out how to get from A to B, he totally spun his wheels and went completely against the character he'd created so that he could force something into place. To me, that's just bad writing.
wasn't the point of meereen her trial at ruling? i think if anything he was dealing with the fact that this kid, who is smart and means well, is not just naturally good at doing everything. As a realistic human, she deserved to make wrong choices time and again, but as far as we can gather from where the books left off and where the show picks up, she does learn from them.
Maybe. But I think there was a better way to handle that if that's the case. Honestly, I think GRRM was just super horny because he was impotent and wrote a bunch of adolescent fantasy about a young hot girl getting banged and being an idiot because of dick. It was all really unfortunate in the wake of such a powerful feminist statement like Feast for Crows.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:joey, you don't actually believe that good soldiers make good kings?
Um, Mecca, you don't think Dany is a good soldier do you?
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

She knows little of the ways of war.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:joey, you don't actually believe that good soldiers make good kings?
Um, Mecca, you don't think Dany is a good soldier do you?



start at 1:38
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21692
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Simple Torture »

Margery in SE05EP03, dunking on Cersei: "I wish we had some wine for you; it's a bit early in the day for us."
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

ANSWER MY QUESTION MECCA AND STOP USING THE SHOW TO REFERENCE AND DEFEND THE NOVELS
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

yeah mecca
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

Renly's a piece of shit btw.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

durdencommatyler wrote:ANSWER MY QUESTION MECCA AND STOP USING THE SHOW TO REFERENCE AND DEFEND THE NOVELS
my answer is no, because i was quoting the show. She's a conqueror, breaker of chains. I also don't think good conquerors make good kings, just like tywin says about robert in the scene i linked above.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

I think it's possible that a good conquerer could also be a good king. The characters aren't that two dimensional.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Renly's a piece of shit btw.
he should've sided with Stannis and accepted being named his heir. Typical little brother syndrome
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:ANSWER MY QUESTION MECCA AND STOP USING THE SHOW TO REFERENCE AND DEFEND THE NOVELS
my answer is no, because i was quoting the show. She's a conqueror, breaker of chains. I also don't think good conquerors make good kings, just like tywin says about robert in the scene i linked above.
Being a conqueror is different than being a soldier, though. So you're asking different questions.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:Renly's a piece of shit btw.
he should've sided with Stannis and accepted being named his heir. Typical little brother syndrome
yep, if he just went full kevan then the lannisters are done for
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I think it's possible that a good conquerer could also be a good king. The characters aren't that two dimensional.
true, but that would take some learning and humility to transition from conquerer to a good ruler. I think we could take it on a case by case basis. I think Aegon the Unlikely would've been good at both, but he had the benefit of living as one of the smallfolk through his squiring
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Either way, Mecca, the fact remains that I'm talking about the books and you're still using the show to counter what I'm saying.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37466
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Norah »

Mecca wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:I think it's possible that a good conquerer could also be a good king. The characters aren't that two dimensional.
true, but that would take some learning and humility to transition from conquerer to a good ruler. I think we could take it on a case by case basis. I think Aegon the Unlikely would've been good at both, but he had the benefit of living as one of the smallfolk through his squiring
aegon the unlikely was the best
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8623
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:ANSWER MY QUESTION MECCA AND STOP USING THE SHOW TO REFERENCE AND DEFEND THE NOVELS
my answer is no, because i was quoting the show. She's a conqueror, breaker of chains. I also don't think good conquerors make good kings, just like tywin says about robert in the scene i linked above.
Being a conqueror is different than being a soldier, though. So you're asking different questions.
joey, you're focusing too much on a reference from the show that i shoehorned into the conversation. it was meant to be a funny "ha i remember that and its kind of a tangent to this conversation" but i was using soldier and conqueror interchangably because thats my choice as being "that reference guy"
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85162
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by epilogue »

Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:ANSWER MY QUESTION MECCA AND STOP USING THE SHOW TO REFERENCE AND DEFEND THE NOVELS
my answer is no, because i was quoting the show. She's a conqueror, breaker of chains. I also don't think good conquerors make good kings, just like tywin says about robert in the scene i linked above.
Being a conqueror is different than being a soldier, though. So you're asking different questions.
joey, you're focusing too much on a reference from the show that i shoehorned into the conversation. it was meant to be a funny "ha i remember that and its kind of a tangent to this conversation" but i was using soldier and conqueror interchangably because thats my choice as being "that reference guy"
Look, just tell me if I'm supposed to post a heart emoji, laughing emoji or bammer emoji.
Post Reply