Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!
Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.stip wrote:that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!
Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Peeps
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
youd be wrong. for most of the story on sakaar appear to be heavily influenced by kirbys art work and are neither flashback, retelling, quick montage and while not a plot device it aids the plottheplatypus wrote:There are a lot of shots thast I like (the ones that look like 17th century paintings) but they will inevitably be part of some flashback / retelling of past events / quick montage and not the actual plot
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Well that looks interesting. It's a bit similar to guardians though no?
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Nodimejinky99 wrote:Well that looks interesting. It's a bit similar to guardians though no?
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I don't think we're talking about the same thingPeeps wrote:youd be wrong. for most of the story on sakaar appear to be heavily influenced by kirbys art work and are neither flashback, retelling, quick montage and while not a plot device it aids the plottheplatypus wrote:There are a lot of shots thast I like (the ones that look like 17th century paintings) but they will inevitably be part of some flashback / retelling of past events / quick montage and not the actual plot
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?
I guess the comedy element. Neither Banner nor Thor strike me as funny guys.
Plus the interior sets look similar
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- doone
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3404
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: right there
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Thor is usually portrayed as a bit of a dim bulb, not quite as literal as Drax but close; that makes for good comedy.dimejinky99 wrote:E.H. Ruddock wrote:Curious how you think it looks similar to Guardians?
I guess the comedy element. Neither Banner nor Thor strike me as funny guys.
Plus the interior sets look similar
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
plus hemsworth is an excellent comedic actor
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I'm not averse to it just surprised by it.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Thor has been played for comedy in every appearance he's made. He is super self-serious and not especially bright which makes for good fodder.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
I don't remember any of the films he's been in really tbh. The marvel movies all sorta blend into each other really.
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45832
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Looks really expensive actually
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- bada
- Looks Like a Cat
- Posts: 12504
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
wease wrote:The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.stip wrote:that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!
Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)
Clancy Brown rules.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Fuck yeah, he does. He'll never beat his role in Shawshank for me.bada wrote:wease wrote:The fire monster is Surtur. Voiced by Clancy Brown, no less.stip wrote:that final shot of Hulk leaping at that fire monster!
Cate Blanchet looks like she's going to chew and swallow every scene she's in, in the best way possible
Here's what Surtur is about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surtur_(Marvel_Comics)
Clancy Brown rules.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Yeah lots of effects but everything is so digital. Even when they are in actual sets, it looks really cheap and weird.BurtReynolds wrote:Looks really expensive actually
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
The CGI looks incomplete but that's become common for these event trailers
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42772
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Thor: Ragnarök (2017) Now with HULK!
Hulk talking looks awful.
The photography on Ruffalo and Thor looks weirdly cheap.
The photography on Ruffalo and Thor looks weirdly cheap.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.