General Pearl Jam Bitching

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by harmless »

McParadigm wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Lightning Bolt.........Lightning Bolt...Lightning BOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLLLTTTTTTTTT!






.........................................LIGHTNING BOLT!
Image
Image
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Whitey McTeeth
Technical Overlord
Posts: 1825
Joined: Sat April 13, 2013 8:18 pm
Location: earf

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by Whitey McTeeth »

They should of called this thing "Steve Holt".
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 18005
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by LetMeSleep »

This whole merch deal with the store being open for days and there being multiple posters and cards and then the dog collars and it just reeks of money grabbing. The music seems to be an afterthought now and just a vehicle to push more merch.

Now the music or the attitude towards the music (to an outsider who knows little of what is actually happening except what is said and delivered).

The lack of band time writing and jamming and structuring new material. It seems that the band sans Ed get together and whittle down their ideas to what they believe would work (forgetting that tracks like Release and Go blossomed from a jamming/relaxed environment). Then Ed picks what he deems worthwhile but he doesn't want to put in too much effort (or do homework).

However he certainly puts in the homework on the material he brings in, essentially they a fully constructed songs. And there will always be 30-40% sole-Vedder compositions on the albums. This seems tilted away from the music that I have been drawn towards in the past.

Then there's the whole getting together for 2 months here for a quick tour and maybe record, hell we might see each other next year haphazardness and it really does come across as they are taking this THING for granted. Especially the live festival circuit and the PJ20 lap of honour they've been on for 3-4 yrs.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by Thejambi »

Why doesn't a single one of these guys have a lightning bolt shaved into their heads?
Fucking pussies.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
kingjeremy
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 6:07 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by kingjeremy »

Whitey McTeeth wrote:They should of called this thing "Steve Holt".
Image
User avatar
@SkitchP
RM Elitist
Posts: 9995
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by @SkitchP »

kingjeremy wrote:
Whitey McTeeth wrote:They should of called this thing "Steve Holt".
Image

OFF TOPIC!
dimejinky99 wrote: Hang on I check on my Grindr
kingjeremy
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 6:07 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by kingjeremy »

@SkitchP wrote:
kingjeremy wrote:
Whitey McTeeth wrote:They should of called this thing "Steve Holt".
Image

OFF TOPIC!
Ha - when are we not :offtopic:
RisingTides
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu July 04, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by RisingTides »

kingjeremy wrote:
@SkitchP wrote:
kingjeremy wrote:
Whitey McTeeth wrote:They should of called this thing "Steve Holt".
Image

OFF TOPIC!
Ha - when are we not :offtopic:

Monitor your postings, as one would be well served to not ruin other posters experience on Red Mosquito.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by Coach »

4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by harmless »

Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by Coach »

harmless wrote:
Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
True. My main point is that it's about (or already is) as bad as RM gets right now. I think I've been on this board for at least 10 years - prior to the 2004 re-set, and the snark level is a 10. Truly dangerous.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by bodysnatcher »

Image
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by harmless »

Coach wrote:
harmless wrote:
Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
True. My main point is that it's about (or already is) as bad as RM gets right now. I think I've been on this board for at least 10 years - prior to the 2004 re-set, and the snark level is a 10. Truly dangerous.
Yeah. It's pretty bad. I was having fun for a while.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
---
Future Drummer
Posts: 2439
Joined: Tue February 12, 2013 5:03 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by --- »

Coach wrote:
harmless wrote:
Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
True. My main point is that it's about (or already is) as bad as RM gets right now. I think I've been on this board for at least 10 years - prior to the 2004 re-set, and the snark level is a 10. Truly dangerous.
what is the danger again?
RisingTides
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu July 04, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by RisingTides »

--- wrote:
Coach wrote:
harmless wrote:
Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
True. My main point is that it's about (or already is) as bad as RM gets right now. I think I've been on this board for at least 10 years - prior to the 2004 re-set, and the snark level is a 10. Truly dangerous.
what is the danger again?

it ruins threads for people who are actually trying to read and debate the topic.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by EJ »

RisingTides wrote:
it ruins threads for people who are actually trying to read and debate the topic.
You do have the option of ignoring user's posts in the user control panel.

Foes are users which will be ignored by default. Posts by these users will not be fully visible. Personal messages from foes are still permitted. Please note that you cannot ignore moderators or administrators.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by McParadigm »

EJ wrote:You do have the option of ignoring user's posts in the user control panel.
It's the little button that looks like this:

Image
(patriotic choking noises)
rar358
Banned from the Pit
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 7:17 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by rar358 »

liebzz wrote:It's hard to compare Pearl Jam with anyone now because they've been around long enough that their careers have taken many turns. They've been at it longer than most of the other bands, and remained largely intact as a unit for 21+ years. There aren't too many bands that have been around like that for so long, other than U2, the Rolling Stones, and maybe a few others. Everyone else has had at least some major changes or rethinking. I guess Aerosmith counts, but in my humble opinion, Aerosmith hasn't really knocked my socks off in a long long time (their 70s output to me is rather solid, but once they pulled off the initial rebranding they just seemed to be a shell of that prior awesomeness).

Then again, U2 went from political anthems to Pop to pumping out cliche anthems ad nausea, the Rolling Stones have had band member changes and long hiatus periods, and Aerosmith had a long break in the 80s to rehab, then pulled career 180s one after the other.

In other words, it's really rare for a group of artists to stay relatively consistent over this long of a time.

Type O Negative, too!
RisingTides
Yeah Yeah Yeah
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu July 04, 2013 2:09 pm

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by RisingTides »

McParadigm wrote:
EJ wrote:You do have the option of ignoring user's posts in the user control panel.
It's the little button that looks like this:

Image

speeno repellent?
User avatar
JimX6
A Return To Form
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu March 28, 2013 3:33 am
Location: NJ

Re: General Pearl Jam Bitching

Post by JimX6 »

Coach wrote:
harmless wrote:
Coach wrote:4-year wait in-between PJ albums + 3 new songs not overwhelmingly well-received by most =

An RM worst-case nightmare scenario for the most negative period in the board's history and easiest time for trolling
You forgot the 90 day count-down clock, even after said 4 years.
True. My main point is that it's about (or already is) as bad as RM gets right now. I think I've been on this board for at least 10 years - prior to the 2004 re-set, and the snark level is a 10. Truly dangerous.
Image
Post Reply