HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
User avatar
doone
Future Drummer
Posts: 3404
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:17 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: right there

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by doone »

Next 2 episodes are supposed to be around 80 minutes.
bada wrote:Cause the two girls on the board voted for the rapey song.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

All I know is Ghost better make an appearance.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:well Jon's a legit Targ
To what purpose
Probably none at least in terms of him being king
it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...
not stronger than gendry's though, right? or do you have to be legitimized to inherit the crown?

Yeah from what I understand you have to be a legitimized heir to have a claim. So Jon has the strongest claim. Direct, legitimized descendant of a prince.

Makes all the scenes between Robert and Ned in season 1 a little different, especially the ones in which Robert joked about Ned's 'bastard' son.
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

The episode felt unusually rushed and there was no doubt stuff I didn't pick up on (always is) but I still liked. The setup is there for a continued action heavy last two shows.
It really stood out that Jamie & Tyrion's big reunion were filmed separately; like Arrested Development season 4 level.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

Oh yeah. The pace was awkward as hell. Some of it was pretty jarring. Going from Dragonstone to King's Landing and back to Dragonstone and finally sailing up to Eastwatch in the span of a afternoon was awkward. Stumbling upon Gendry and him just being all yeah let's go was silly. And a lot of the other scenes seemed contrived too. Like Jorah magically showing up at that exact moment.

Looking forward to the next episode even though the purpose for the mission beyond the wall is pretty damn silly.
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8622
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Mecca »

spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:well Jon's a legit Targ
To what purpose
Probably none at least in terms of him being king
it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...
That may be, but a line in a book won't make him a king unless someone looks for it while they're in a situation to name a king. It was a nod to book/theory readers if anything.
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

Well it gives Jon some added context and it's kind of a big deal that Jon wasn't the product of rape which was the prevailing gossip. The other character that was the product of rape was Ramsey.

It could create some friction between him and Dany as well.
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by malice »

this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52027
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

malice wrote:this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.
I mean, not much really happened except Jon touched a dragon
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
jwfocker
AnalLog
Posts: 1855
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 9:44 pm

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by jwfocker »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
malice wrote:this is the least discussion of an episode the day after the show ive seen in this thread.
I mean, not much really happened except Jon touched a dragon

Ton of fluff. Just characters meeting and moving around.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

jwfocker wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
spike wrote:
Mecca wrote:
doone wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:well Jon's a legit Targ
To what purpose
Probably none at least in terms of him being king
it means he has the strongest claim to the iron throne, stronger than dany's...
not stronger than gendry's though, right? or do you have to be legitimized to inherit the crown?

Yeah from what I understand you have to be a legitimized heir to have a claim. So Jon has the strongest claim. Direct, legitimized descendant of a prince.

Makes all the scenes between Robert and Ned in season 1 a little different, especially the ones in which Robert joked about Ned's 'bastard' son.
Jon is the heir to the Targaryens (son of crown prince Rhaegar, and the grandson of the mad king), he is the second closest living relation to Robert after Gendry (since the Baratheons and Targaryens are related), but the closest that is legitimized, and he is the elected king of the north, and the son of a Stark. It will almost certainly matter somehow, but perhaps not in a way that puts him on the throne.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

dimejinky99 wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:because he wants Sansa all to himself

hes not stupid though yet he seems to be at the moment. neither is sansa..she isnt gonna stand by and let herself be used or jon undermined through her...though the scene with arya seems to foreshadow that a bit
What would you do if you were Littlefinger, and wanted to marry Sansa, and rule vast lands? He has to scheme and come up with something special.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

cutuphalfdead wrote:Yeah I don't get why Cersei needs to be convinced. They should fortify Moat Cailin to fend off any potential attack from the south, and then focus on what's going on with the WW themselves. If Dany needs proof first she can go for a dragon flight north of the wall and see them.
That would make too much sense.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Anders wrote:Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by malice »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.
this
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.
Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Monkey_Driven »

Anders wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.
Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?
All of the battles have seemed rushed. Part of it is for the element of surprise to the viewer, but the logistics of these battles are left unexplained.

The scenes around the Painted Table have seemed rushed.

Jaime/Cersei has been rushed.

Jon and Dany's relationship is progressing at warp speed.

The Starks at Winterfell have been rushed. Arya "knows" Sansa's true motivations and they've spent like 2 scenes together since they were reunited.

Assembling the Avengers to go north of the wall all happened in like 20 minutes of this episode. Rushed.

In previous seasons all of these would have been explored/shown in much more detail.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46240
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by BurtReynolds »

I wonder how much the actor's salaries go up over the seasons.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: HBO: Game of Thrones (Song of Ice and Fire)

Post by Anders »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
Anders wrote:Feels very strange that Daenarys would agree to an alliance with Cersei at this point. Even with the army of the dead. I really can't see the three armies working together.

Besides that the season does feel rushed. They are travelling great diatances in seconds, and even with time passing in between, with the way the scenes mix, it doesn't make sense. The mission beyond the wall, the people on it, and how they are prepared, also seemed really off.
The fast traveling doesn't bother me. It is the lack of character development to understand their motivations and tactics that is the problem.
Which motivations and tactics are you thinking of?
All of the battles have seemed rushed. Part of it is for the element of surprise to the viewer, but the logistics of these battles are left unexplained.

The scenes around the Painted Table have seemed rushed.

Jaime/Cersei has been rushed.

Jon and Dany's relationship is progressing at warp speed.

The Starks at Winterfell have been rushed. Arya "knows" Sansa's true motivations and they've spent like 2 scenes together since they were reunited.

Assembling the Avengers to go north of the wall all happened in like 20 minutes of this episode. Rushed.

In previous seasons all of these would have been explored/shown in much more detail.
Yes, I really loved last week's episode, and have enjoyed the season, but I agree with most of those. There should be more room for relationships to evolve, more scenes between characters to flesh out what is happening, a feel of time passing and people travelling. With the amount of time that has passed elsewhere, Arya might have been back to Winterfell for months already. But it's impossible to tell.
Post Reply