53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Other than Pearl Jam, who else is there?
Locked

Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Paper Cuts
11
69%
Put You Down
5
31%
 
Total votes: 16

User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by stip »



User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by stip »

I don't really like either of these. Paper Cuts, I guess
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

I fucking love Paper Cuts. Nirvana at peak Melvins influence. Sludgy, noisy, wonderful.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by Iholdthepain »

Paper Cuts easily!
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by tragabigzanda »

Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by Iholdthepain »

tragabigzanda wrote:Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
Re-cutting drum tracks is about the most difficult thing in the world to ask an engineer to do! Drums sound great as is anyway.

EDIT: I mean, unless they're just playing to a click.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by tragabigzanda »

Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
Re-cutting drum tracks is about the most difficult thing in the world to ask an engineer to do! Drums sound great as is anyway.

EDIT: I mean, unless they're just playing to a click.
Oh, it's so easy these days with time stretching. That whole record could easily be stretched to fit a grid and click track, then re-humanized once the parts were captured. Assuming Dave could remember the parts easy enough, you're talking about three days in the studio before a mixing session.
User avatar
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33839
Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by LoathedVermin72 »

Channing is awesome on Bleach. The production is the problem, not the playing.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by Iholdthepain »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
Re-cutting drum tracks is about the most difficult thing in the world to ask an engineer to do! Drums sound great as is anyway.

EDIT: I mean, unless they're just playing to a click.
Oh, it's so easy these days with time stretching. That whole record could easily be stretched to fit a grid and click track, then re-humanized once the parts were captured. Assuming Dave could remember the parts easy enough, you're talking about three days in the studio before a mixing session.
Ok maybe, but there's just something not right about pitch shifting, time stretching, and re-humanizing (whatever that is)... Give me some 2" tape, punch-ins, and a razor blade :-)
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by tragabigzanda »

Yeah, but those guitar, bass, and vocal tracks would still sound great. A new set of drum tracks would make the whole record sound huge.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by tragabigzanda »

Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
Re-cutting drum tracks is about the most difficult thing in the world to ask an engineer to do! Drums sound great as is anyway.

EDIT: I mean, unless they're just playing to a click.
Oh, it's so easy these days with time stretching. That whole record could easily be stretched to fit a grid and click track, then re-humanized once the parts were captured. Assuming Dave could remember the parts easy enough, you're talking about three days in the studio before a mixing session.
Ok maybe, but there's just something not right about pitch shifting, time stretching, and re-humanizing (whatever that is)... Give me some 2" tape, punch-ins, and a razor blade :-)
I used to love to bias my 2" machine and try to splice tape. But recent advances in summing boxes and plug-ins have rendered that approach unnecessarily laborious in my mind. Track digital, sum through an analog box to tape for the glue (compression and HF/LF roll off), then back to digital for the mix.
User avatar
Iholdthepain
Future Drummer
Posts: 3096
Joined: Wed February 26, 2014 12:08 am
Location: the afterlife...

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by Iholdthepain »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Iholdthepain wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:Listened to bleach on my drive today, it still slays. I would love if someday we got a reworked version with new drum performances by Grohl.
Re-cutting drum tracks is about the most difficult thing in the world to ask an engineer to do! Drums sound great as is anyway.

EDIT: I mean, unless they're just playing to a click.
Oh, it's so easy these days with time stretching. That whole record could easily be stretched to fit a grid and click track, then re-humanized once the parts were captured. Assuming Dave could remember the parts easy enough, you're talking about three days in the studio before a mixing session.
Ok maybe, but there's just something not right about pitch shifting, time stretching, and re-humanizing (whatever that is)... Give me some 2" tape, punch-ins, and a razor blade :-)
I used to love to bias my 2" machine and try to splice tape. But recent advances in summing boxes and plug-ins have rendered that approach unnecessarily laborious in my mind. Track digital, sum through an analog box to tape for the glue (compression and HF/LF roll off), then back to digital for the mix.
I was just kidding about the tape... Can one even find a reel of clean 2" tape anymore? I thought it was all discontinued a few years back. Also, the tape splicing was indeed laborious, but it was a labor of love. All the tracking I ever do anymore is in Audacity... as a hobby, not as a job.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by tragabigzanda »

There was a company that started making new tape several years back. Early reports were that it shed like crazy, and I know they changed something in the process to minimize that. No idea if they're still going or not.
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: 53. Paper Cuts vs. Put You Down

Post by PHATJ »

Paper Cuts
Locked