Page 6 of 27
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Tue July 23, 2024 11:38 pm
by dimejinky99
Jorge wrote:4/5 wrote:Kinda surprised how excited RM is for Kamala Harris at the moment.
Dems on the whole seem positively elated. I think people went into a deep depression after that first debate and they kind of forgot what it felt like to think they had a chance.
that isnt the story though. Its the panic and vitriol from Trump down throughout the whole MAGA base and GOP stalwarts, theyre in meltdown over it.
thats the story.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Tue July 23, 2024 11:44 pm
by BurtReynolds
It's certainly a story.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 1:32 am
by lennytheweedwhacker
The first four pages of this thread are some terrible rm’ing
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 2:00 am
by zeb
How would you improve them, Lenny?
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 2:18 am
by B
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:The first four pages of this thread are some terrible rm’ing
You didn't enjoy the debate about whether or not I'm a shitty cousin?
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 4:59 am
by Bammer
B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 6:20 am
by Higgs
Bammer wrote:B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 10:49 am
by spike
Higgs wrote:Bammer wrote:B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 11:42 am
by Anders
Hopefully she will win the election in November (the 2024 United States presidential election).
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 11:57 am
by tragabigzanda
FUCK ICE
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 12:33 pm
by Jorge
Love you Anders
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 12:58 pm
by Bammer
spike wrote:Higgs wrote:Bammer wrote:B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 1:05 pm
by spike
Bammer wrote:spike wrote:Higgs wrote:Bammer wrote:B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
i think we're close to a breakthrough here
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 1:14 pm
by Bammer
spike wrote:Bammer wrote:spike wrote:Higgs wrote:Bammer wrote:B wrote:Ms. B is amped. If women are half as excited as her, we'll have a President Harris by a landslide.
Which of Harris’ qualifications is Mrs. B most excited about other than “not born with a penis”?
You're a weird guy Bammer.
He’s terrified that, at this rate, he might end up working for a woman one day.
Most of my professional life has been working for women plus I’m married. Can’t phase me on this front.
i think we're close to a breakthrough here
Go on
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 1:47 pm
by simple schoolboy
New Birtherism dropped: Harris is ineligible because her parents weren't naturalized at the time of her birth (or something along those lines). Would "Native Born" mean something that would disqualify most of the founders?
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 2:35 pm
by Anders
Jorge wrote:Love you Anders
Love you too.
tragabigzanda wrote:Thanks for clarifying and welcome back
Always someone ready with a joke, thought I would get ahead of them.
Thank you, although I never left.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 4:13 pm
by B
Alright, calm down, Newsmax, she already has my vote.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 5:44 pm
by simple schoolboy
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 5:50 pm
by 4/5
simple schoolboy wrote:New Birtherism dropped: Harris is ineligible because her parents weren't naturalized at the time of her birth (or something along those lines). Would "Native Born" mean something that would disqualify most of the founders?
No.
Article 2 wrote:No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
Of course this version of birtherism is particularly absurd since she was born in the U.S., thus a natural born citizen and eligible to be president.
14th Amendment wrote:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
Re: The All-Inclusive Kamala Harris thread
Posted: Wed July 24, 2024 5:52 pm
by B
Well ...
That IS a reconstruction amendment that the Supreme Court can't WAIT to strip away.