Re: Will Ferrell Accepts RHCP Chad Smith's Drum Challenge
Posted: Mon February 17, 2014 6:18 pm
.
I hate when that sort of thing is not publicly acknowledged.harmless wrote:I also like how it's publicly acknowledged that these guys look the same.
It's doppelganger erasure, yep.McParadigm wrote:I hate when that sort of thing is not publicly acknowledged.harmless wrote:I also like how it's publicly acknowledged that these guys look the same.
BurtReynolds wrote:...something something intersextualism...


I know, I know. Words have meaning. It's informational graphs that don't because #classically oppressive education.harmless wrote:What's the difference between personal attacks on me, and Chad's personal attack on everyone that takes medication? You can think what you like, but ultimately if you watch someone get punched, and respect the right of the bully to punch, that's pretty strange. People need to get off this idea that words don't mean anything, and if they mean something to you, it's your own fault. The sad thing is you'd probably think I had a point if you felt no need to defend this shitty band.bada wrote:Then I stand by my statement. I'm for Chad's right to try and be funny and your right to be offended by it. If the discussion as to whether or not the joke was funny descended into personal attacks on you then that's not cool.harmless wrote:They're both relevant though; I didn't appreciate Chad's 'joke', that's where it started. But apparently I'm not allowed to say that because he's giving a bunch of money to charity, and because RHCP are totally kewl.bada wrote:My comment was about Chad Smith's schtick I must have skipped past where someone got on you.harmless wrote:In this situation? The one having ableist slurs thrown at me and being called 'over-sensitive' for not liking it. You can take the other role if you want.bada wrote:harmless wrote:No, one is a dick, the other isn't.bada wrote:You know someone can find a joke funny and someone else could be offended by it and both be "right". Wah.
Which are you?
I just want to bearhug you at this point. Here it comes. OH GOD YESSSSharmless wrote:Oh, the part where you referred to other people getting annoyed about other things that have nothing to do with me or this situation at all, and you're pathologically unable to tell the difference? Yeah, I read that bit.LuNY wrote:"People take themselves way too seriously on this forum, like it fucking matters. Long drawn out posts about Sirens or something. Sad. Like "oh god Eddie took a picture with One Direction, what does this mean for MEEEEE and my crazy fucking sad lifeeeee."harmless wrote:So what, if you say something that someone else finds offensive, then they're taking themselves too seriously, you're not being a douche?LuNY wrote:theplatypus wrote:I dunno, I think making fun of mental illness as a putdown is a shitty thing to do. I understand Chad Smith's use of it because he was being jokey and deliberately ridiculous to play up his "feud" with Ferrell, but LuNY telling Harmless he takes meds "for the crazies", then posting a video of a babbling Charles Manson (when Harmless's posts, as a whole, make a lot more sense than LuNY's meandering ramblings) is mean-spirited and ableist.
Example? Sorry I don't spend hours making my posts, I post something quickly, usually for humor or if I find a PJ article, or say War Child (charity for the harms of war) People take themselves way too seriously on this forum, like it fucking matters. Long drawn out posts about Sirens or something. Sad. Like "oh god Eddie took a picture with One Direction, what does this mean for MEEEEE and my crazy fucking sad lifeeeee."
Seriously though I doubt harmless is mentally ill and I don't want to insult anyone really. The meds thing is Chads fault. Fuck you Chad Smith.
You have to keep reading, you took it out of context. YOU ARE NOT THE BRIGHTEST CRAYON IN THE BOX. Jokes make you mad, boofuckinhoo