This is not a Tory leaflet, and was distributed by a porn production company looking to sell their porn:BurtReynolds wrote:
http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/02/someone-h ... t-6611798/
Feels weird bringing it up in 2016, no matter who you support.
What's 1 seat between Labour and Tory?
-
Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36483
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: What's 1 seat between Labour and Tory?
http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/02/someone-h ... t-6611798/
Feels weird bringing it up in 2016, no matter who you support.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
-
Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36483
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: What's 1 seat between Labour and Tory?
BTW I love the UK
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: What's 1 seat between Labour and Tory?
*Uninformed speculation*
There's a fellow at work who for whatever reason is now an American citizen, but used to be of the British persuasion. Admittedly, he only surmises that the exterior cladding was part of a 'facelift' to make the exterior of the Grenfell building more attractive to the neighbors. Due to the aesthetic nature of the project, the flammability of the material used was not a significant consideration. Is this at all in line with what the British press is saying?
There's a fellow at work who for whatever reason is now an American citizen, but used to be of the British persuasion. Admittedly, he only surmises that the exterior cladding was part of a 'facelift' to make the exterior of the Grenfell building more attractive to the neighbors. Due to the aesthetic nature of the project, the flammability of the material used was not a significant consideration. Is this at all in line with what the British press is saying?