I like the "look" of the ghost effects but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through two hours of Leslie Jones.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 4:47 pm
by Monkey_Driven
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like the "look" of the ghost effects but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through two hours of Leslie Jones.
She's pretty awful.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 6:12 pm
by Mecca
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like the "look" of the ghost effects but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through two hours of Leslie Jones.
Misogyracist
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 6:18 pm
by VinylGuy
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 6:37 pm
by lennytheweedwhacker
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like the "look" of the ghost effects but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through two hours of Leslie Jones.
what if she were naked the whole time?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:04 pm
by B
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:36 pm
by Mecca
lennytheweedwhacker wrote:
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I like the "look" of the ghost effects but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through two hours of Leslie Jones.
what if she were naked the whole time?
Verb would have another stroke
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 7:41 pm
by stip
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
yeah, now i'm excited for this movie
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 9:12 pm
by Mecca
stip wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
yeah, now i'm excited for this movie
But you saw all of the bad stuff in the official trailer?
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 9:30 pm
by @SkitchP
Finally watched the trailer. I wish I hadn't
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 9:49 pm
by epilogue
Mecca wrote:
stip wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
yeah, now i'm excited for this movie
But you saw all of the bad stuff in the official trailer?
There's no "is it the hat or the wig?" scene. So... nope. Dislike.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 9:55 pm
by B
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:
stip wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
yeah, now i'm excited for this movie
But you saw all of the bad stuff in the official trailer?
There's no "is it the hat or the wig?" scene. So... nope. Dislike.
That wasn't so bad. I didn't hurt myself laughing, but that didn't insult my intelligence.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Fri March 04, 2016 11:45 pm
by epilogue
B wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:
stip wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Mecca wrote:
B wrote:Y'know, I watched this again. If they'd skipped the scene with Melissa McCarthy getting possessed and Leslie Jones smacking her around, I'd actually be excited about this.
This makes for a better teaser, but it's hard to unsee the bad from the actual trailer
Way better.
yeah, now i'm excited for this movie
But you saw all of the bad stuff in the official trailer?
There's no "is it the hat or the wig?" scene. So... nope. Dislike.
That wasn't so bad. I didn't hurt myself laughing, but that didn't insult my intelligence.
It was the biggest laugh I had, that's for sure. I love KM. I think she's gonna make this thing.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 1:40 am
by McParadigm
I especially like the "I'm not smart like you white people but I'm super urban" line.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 2:10 am
by Strat
I have no idea why they went for a reboot. Sequel would have been much better. "oh, old ghostbusters can't do anything anymore so lets train some new ones"
like star wars!
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 2:28 am
by B
Strat wrote:I have no idea why they went for a reboot. Sequel would have been much better. "oh, old ghostbusters can't do anything anymore so lets train some new ones"
like star wars!
The trailer seems to imply that they recognize the events of the first two movies.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:02 am
by stip
I read that it's a reboot
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:34 am
by B
stip wrote:I read that it's a reboot
Yeah, that's what they've been calling it, but the beginning of that trailer implies otherwise.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:48 am
by B
During the scene where Kristen Wiig's character 'Erin Gilbert' is being introduced, there's a quick shot of her white board and if you take a closer look you can see that it contained countless formulas and other research into the world of the paranormal. At the top of this board was a odd formula - [Pa/RA(NO*RM)alS + UD1es/Lab]com - which translates into paranormalstudios.com, and leads to a hidden viral site made for the Ghostbusters film featuring a detailed behind-the-scenes look at the tech the new set of heroes will utilize in their upcoming film.
Re: Ghostbusters (2016)
Posted: Sat March 05, 2016 3:57 am
by Strat
It's a reboot and all they are doing is "Hey remember the originals!?"
McP and LV will have field day with such comments when i love star wars but whatever.
