Page 52 of 59

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue November 26, 2019 10:24 pm
by parasolmonster
Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue November 26, 2019 10:35 pm
by epilogue
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 6:38 am
by parasolmonster
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.
If you didn’t already know, flip through the books with some 3D glasses (Dr. Jacoby style), you’ll find some interesting surprises

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 2:03 pm
by epilogue
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.
If you didn’t already know, flip through the books with some 3D glasses (Dr. Jacoby style), you’ll find some interesting surprises
WHAT

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 5:53 pm
by parasolmonster
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.
If you didn’t already know, flip through the books with some 3D glasses (Dr. Jacoby style), you’ll find some interesting surprises
WHAT
I’m overdue to reread the books, so I don’t remember a lot, just that there is nothing mind blowing, but it’s a fun little secret to the books.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 6:34 pm
by epilogue
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.
If you didn’t already know, flip through the books with some 3D glasses (Dr. Jacoby style), you’ll find some interesting surprises
WHAT
I’m overdue to reread the books, so I don’t remember a lot, just that there is nothing mind blowing, but it’s a fun little secret to the books.
That's so cool. I had no idea. Thanks!

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 11:10 pm
by WtOB?

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 11:18 pm
by oasisfan35
WtOB? wrote:
Twenty seconds in, given his voice and tone, I want to bludgeon his skull with a Louisville Slugger.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Wed November 27, 2019 11:22 pm
by WtOB?
oasisfan35 wrote:
WtOB? wrote:
Twenty seconds in, given his voice and tone, I want to bludgeon his skull with a Louisville Slugger.
hang in there, it’s only 4 and a half hours long.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Thu November 28, 2019 9:16 am
by parasolmonster
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
parasolmonster wrote:Frost’s two Twin Peaks books are super underrated. Did you read Secret History?
Yeah, I did that one before S3 started. Loved it. I have no idea why it took me so long to get around to this one.
If you didn’t already know, flip through the books with some 3D glasses (Dr. Jacoby style), you’ll find some interesting surprises
WHAT
I’m overdue to reread the books, so I don’t remember a lot, just that there is nothing mind blowing, but it’s a fun little secret to the books.
That's so cool. I had no idea. Thanks!
I just remembered that the “secrets” reveal themselves with 3D glasses, but you look through one lens at a time. The blue lense will show one thing, while the red shows another

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 5:28 am
by Mecca
I just finished the original series for the first time ever and am just getting into season 3. Maclachlan’s performance as Dougie Jones is mesmerizing

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 11:55 am
by epilogue
Mecca wrote:I just finished the original series for the first time ever and am just getting into season 3. Maclachlan’s performance as Dougie Jones is mesmerizing
:luv:

What are your thoughts on the OG series?

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 12:29 pm
by wease
Twin Peaks was kinda mentioned in last week's The Good Place.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 12:30 pm
by Anders
I heard that David Lynch was forced into making this season. Is that true?

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 2:19 pm
by Mecca
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:I just finished the original series for the first time ever and am just getting into season 3. Maclachlan’s performance as Dougie Jones is mesmerizing
:luv:

What are your thoughts on the OG series?
Loved the backdrop of humanity to an ostensibly supernatural show. I was very confused by how season 2 went on after the Leland/Bob reveal; that conclusion didn’t have time to breathe. Windom Earle was menacing, but the story felt like a “oh by the way” tacked on

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 3:07 pm
by Mecca
Also,
Spoiler: show
HellooooOOOOOoooo

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 4:43 pm
by epilogue
wease wrote:Twin Peaks was kinda mentioned in last week's The Good Place.
And it was amazing.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 4:51 pm
by epilogue
Mecca wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
Mecca wrote:I just finished the original series for the first time ever and am just getting into season 3. Maclachlan’s performance as Dougie Jones is mesmerizing
:luv:

What are your thoughts on the OG series?
Loved the backdrop of humanity to an ostensibly supernatural show. I was very confused by how season 2 went on after the Leland/Bob reveal; that conclusion didn’t have time to breathe. Windom Earle was menacing, but the story felt like a “oh by the way” tacked on
Lynch and Frost never intended to "solve" the murder of Laura Palmer. They fought hard to never reveal the killer. ABC made them which is why that whole thing feels so weird. I think if we break the OG series into 3 parts as opposed to 2 seasons, it makes a lot more sense.

To me there's:
PART ONE: Pilot - S1E8 (The Last Evening)
PART TWO: S2E1 (May the Giant Be With You) - S2E10 (Dispute Between Brothers)
PART THREE: S2E11 (Masked Ball) - S2E22 (Life Beyond Death)
TWIN PEAKS: FIRE WALK WITH ME
TWIN PEAKS: THE RETURN

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 5:38 pm
by wease
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:Twin Peaks was kinda mentioned in last week's The Good Place.
And it was amazing.
I was wondering if you’d seen it yet.

Re: Twin Peaks [2017]

Posted: Tue January 28, 2020 6:18 pm
by epilogue
wease wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
wease wrote:Twin Peaks was kinda mentioned in last week's The Good Place.
And it was amazing.
I was wondering if you’d seen it yet.
My wife and I both yelped when we watched it. Also stopped the stream to rewind and watch it again just because. :lol: