Everyone sucks at it.PHATJ wrote:Fangraphs sucks at predicting win totals
MLB
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
I think they'll be better than that too, but basing it on the team record last year isn't a great idea. If a team has a lot of luck, health, and a bunch of career years from players, it's a bad idea to expect those things to carry forward into the next season.MadTIGERmaN wrote:yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15608
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: MLB
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.MadTIGERmaN wrote:yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: MLB
The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?numbers wrote:NERDScutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37472
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: MLB
I will not have my integrity impugned.numbers wrote:The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?numbers wrote:NERDScutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
- MadTIGERmaN
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:12 am
- Location: The Jungle
Re: MLB
But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)Chris_H_2 wrote:They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.MadTIGERmaN wrote:yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35978
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: MLB
i gotta think they move santana or phillips (i don't see broxton getting much interest) for starting pitching. if they could get a guy like chris archer - or even patrick corbin or danny salazar - in a trade, then manage to lure yu darvish, folks would have to start taking their 2018 chances seriously.MadTIGERmaN wrote:But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)Chris_H_2 wrote:They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.MadTIGERmaN wrote:yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
So will Vlad Jr have to wait until his second year to get in like his dad, or will he be a first ballot guy?
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: MLB
This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: MLB
philpritchard wrote:This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
Just change all the names. The Braves, the Chiefs, the Redskins.... the Seminoles etc.
The Washington Bullets changed their name for goodness sakes. Team mascots should not be news. Change the names pick an animal or a machine of some type.... move on.