Page 511 of 792

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 1:21 pm
by philpritchard
PHATJ wrote:Fangraphs sucks at predicting win totals
Everyone sucks at it.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 1:24 pm
by philpritchard
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
I think they'll be better than that too, but basing it on the team record last year isn't a great idea. If a team has a lot of luck, health, and a bunch of career years from players, it's a bad idea to expect those things to carry forward into the next season.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 2:04 pm
by Chris_H_2
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 2:08 pm
by numbers
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 4:22 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 5:13 pm
by Chris_H_2
pete, how many wins does PECOTA have for your dart team this coming up season?

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 5:20 pm
by Norah
97

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 5:24 pm
by Chris_H_2
regress to the mean

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 5:26 pm
by Norah
Our (adjusted) win total this season was 105. We're going up a level so that's why PECOTA is projecting us to have 8 fewer wins. 97 is still a damned good season.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 6:11 pm
by numbers
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?
The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 6:30 pm
by Norah
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:PECOTA or GTFO
NERDS
I'm sorry, how many Bellhorn championships have you won?
The same amount of championships you’ve won when you weren’t controlling the league.
I will not have my integrity impugned.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 6:54 pm
by numbers
I’m just stating a fact, no commentary on anyone’s integrity.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 7:05 pm
by Norah
I will cut you.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 7:08 pm
by numbers
I may have stumbled onto something here.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sat January 27, 2018 11:12 pm
by MadTIGERmaN
Chris_H_2 wrote:
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.
But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)

Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun January 28, 2018 5:09 am
by spike
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
MadTIGERmaN wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Fangraphs has the Brewers with a 76-win projection after the trade/signing
yup, 10 less than last year, and the only player they lost was Jimmy Nelson and his 12 wins. With the Reds and Pirates in the division, I dont see how the Brewers and Cubs dont finish well above .500
They had like 3-4 guys that had ridiculous, sometimes career, years last year. They’re bound to regress. Thames’s second half compared to his first is a good example.
But now Thames has a full season under his belt and knows what to expect, so, the fatigue that hit in the second half, may not be as drastic this year. That and theres already talk of Braun playing some 1B and having an OF of Yelich, Cain and Santana (I'm still betting Santana gets moved at some point though)

Either way, I get what youre saying about basing this year off of last year, but the Pirates and Reds should, be pretty bad again this year. Id say the Brewers and Cubs will be neck and neck for the division most of the year with the Cards being the Cards lingering just close enough to make ya watch them (which should be hovering around .500)
i gotta think they move santana or phillips (i don't see broxton getting much interest) for starting pitching. if they could get a guy like chris archer - or even patrick corbin or danny salazar - in a trade, then manage to lure yu darvish, folks would have to start taking their 2018 chances seriously.

Re: MLB

Posted: Sun January 28, 2018 6:16 am
by philpritchard
So will Vlad Jr have to wait until his second year to get in like his dad, or will he be a first ballot guy?

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon January 29, 2018 6:11 pm
by verb_to_trust
Good riddance chief wahoo

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon January 29, 2018 6:49 pm
by philpritchard
verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."

Re: MLB

Posted: Mon January 29, 2018 7:11 pm
by Electromatic
philpritchard wrote:
verb_to_trust wrote:Good riddance chief wahoo
This is going to draw out a lot of hilarious responses from people who are "totally not racist at all but..."

Just change all the names. The Braves, the Chiefs, the Redskins.... the Seminoles etc.

The Washington Bullets changed their name for goodness sakes. Team mascots should not be news. Change the names pick an animal or a machine of some type.... move on.