Re: Star Wars: Episode VII: The Force Awakens (2015)
Posted: Thu December 24, 2015 5:30 pm
When will they break the man/droid taboo, that's what I want to know
stip wrote:When will they break the man/droid taboo, that's what I want to know
And here you've been linking to reviews?!??dimejinky99 wrote:stip wrote:When will they break the man/droid taboo, that's what I want to know
Japanese edit of the film already has..
McParadigm wrote:And here you've been linking to reviews?!??dimejinky99 wrote:stip wrote:When will they break the man/droid taboo, that's what I want to know
Japanese edit of the film already has..
I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
If your goal is based on cultural importance, generalized public perception of previous films, and emulating the tone of other films, than your goal is moronic and your artistic enterprise is barely that, and almost certain to fail. The goal of every film should be, first and foremost, to be engaging and insightful on its own terms. An artist should be concerned with doing justice to their own vision, not worrying about a franchise's "importance" and reputation. That is what makes this an empty, corporate product.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
Any "themes" in TFA were superficial (barely specified beyond archetype) and disconnected from any contemporary social awareness. They are there merely to drive the product and make it relatable to the public in the most banal way possible.dimejinky99 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
and to you point about it not working thematically?
if there is a bigger and more engaging theme about family and ties and deception and failure and love/love lost, all within the umbrella of family, as a theme? i'd love to know what you think that is.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:If your goal is based on cultural importance, generalized public perception of previous films, and emulating the tone of other films, than your goal is moronic and your artistic enterprise is barely that, and almost certain to fail. The goal of every film should be, first and foremost, to be engaging and insightful on its own terms. An artist should be concerned with doing justice to their own vision, not worrying about a franchise's "importance" and reputation. That is what makes this an empty, corporate product.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
Of course. I'm not arguing against the commercialism of art. I love Godzilla and Man of Steel for fuck's sake.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:If your goal is based on cultural importance, generalized public perception of previous films, and emulating the tone of other films, than your goal is moronic and your artistic enterprise is barely that, and almost certain to fail. The goal of every film should be, first and foremost, to be engaging and insightful on its own terms. An artist should be concerned with doing justice to their own vision, not worrying about a franchise's "importance" and reputation. That is what makes this an empty, corporate product.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
two part response: disney shareholders looking for a healthy return in profit/ a genuine desire to establish SW as a thing of importance (and as a nice side treat, paving the way for endless future films and trilogies.
Youre imposing all these high minded ideas & principles on something which is basically commercial at its roots.
art and commerce can coexist, but i dont need to tell you which one gets exploited for the furthering of the other.
LoathedVermin72 wrote:Any "themes" in TFA were superficial (barely specified beyond archetype) and disconnected from any contemporary social awareness. They are there merely to drive the product and make it relatable to the public in the most banal way possible.dimejinky99 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
and to you point about it not working thematically?
if there is a bigger and more engaging theme about family and ties and deception and failure and love/love lost, all within the umbrella of family, as a theme? i'd love to know what you think that is.
The OT wasn't exactly sophisticated intellectually, but at least it was latently political. As Armond White noted, Luke's "symbolic castration" at the hands of his father in ESB had cultural significance (a significance in which TFA is thoroughly uninterested).
Again, superficial and obvious to the point of banality.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Any "themes" in TFA were superficial (barely specified beyond archetype) and disconnected from any contemporary social awareness. They are there merely to drive the product and make it relatable to the public in the most banal way possible.dimejinky99 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
and to you point about it not working thematically?
if there is a bigger and more engaging theme about family and ties and deception and failure and love/love lost, all within the umbrella of family, as a theme? i'd love to know what you think that is.
The OT wasn't exactly sophisticated intellectually, but at least it was latently political. As Armond White noted, Luke's "symbolic castration" at the hands of his father in ESB had cultural significance (a significance in which TFA is thoroughly uninterested).
'contemporary social awareness'?? the First order are acting like a splinter cell terror group..no contemporary social awareness? no political standpoint?
That symbolic castration point was one of the dumbest pieces of pretentious crap I have ever readLoathedVermin72 wrote:Any "themes" in TFA were superficial (barely specified beyond archetype) and disconnected from any contemporary social awareness. They are there merely to drive the product and make it relatable to the public in the most banal way possible.dimejinky99 wrote:dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:Yeah, for the record, I don't think this movie's fundamental problem is that it rips off the OT (which it very lazily and uncreatively does); as someone who doesn't generally care about story, that's almost immaterial. The problem is that I just don't think it's an engaging, insightful, or intelligent movie at all, primarily for aesthetic and thematic reasons.dimejinky99 wrote:LoathedVermin72 wrote:I'd say I generally like Episode I despite the shitty acting. II and III are about 50/50, though I don't outright dislike any of them. Overall, I'd say the prequels are mediocre. I respect most of the vision, I just wish the execution weren't so incompetent.dimejinky99 wrote:LV where do you rate the prequels?
thats ok..
interesting idea..T2 is basically the same story, but it's still great on its own terms.
thats completely fine but that wasn't the mission with this. The goals were to completely wipe the memory and toxicity of the prequels from the minds of the public at large, and reinstall SW as a work of cultural importance. To do that we need to have it all *feel* like SW again by any means necessary, and it's mission accomplished. This episode is just set up and exposition. You know Ep8 will be the real meat of the matter.
and to you point about it not working thematically?
if there is a bigger and more engaging theme about family and ties and deception and failure and love/love lost, all within the umbrella of family, as a theme? i'd love to know what you think that is.
The OT wasn't exactly sophisticated intellectually, but at least it was latently political. As Armond White noted, Luke's "symbolic castration" at the hands of his father in ESB had cultural significance (a significance in which TFA is thoroughly uninterested).